Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
05-07-2004, 11:19 AM | #1 |
Led Sled! Discs R 4 ME!
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Toms River, NJ, USA (Transplanted Hoosier)
Posts: 7,327
|
Narrowing 4x front axle?
Has anyone Narrowed a front axle?
The one in question is a dana 44. I'm wondering if there is short axle shafts avaliable and what approx cost might be involved. Thanks, Denny |
05-07-2004, 12:42 PM | #2 |
just can't cover up my redneck
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Columbus OH
Posts: 11,414
|
Yes, it can and has been done. It is rather expensive though.
The feasibility of this will depend upon how much you are looking to remove, tire diameter and intended use. You will start having clearance problems with the springs (turning radius) It is best done to the left side (long) axle, this leaves you with a "stock" piece on the weak side. More often than not, the short axle is the weaker link. Plus you only have one custom part. Shorten the left side and move the entire axle housing over to re-center the housing. If you are only talking about an inch or 2, you may be better off with changing the off-set of the wheels. Last edited by LONGHAIR; 05-08-2004 at 04:11 PM. |
05-07-2004, 12:46 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: sw colorado
Posts: 2,720
|
in fourwheeler a few years ago they did that. they built a jig to hold the frontend with the C's for the knucles in relation to one another. this allowed them to set their pinion angle to their needs before they rewelded the knuckles on. you can have custom axles built by moser or dynatrac. this can get pricey. especially if you break them often. you can find different dana 44 front end applications and make yours use the off the shelf length shafts to keep price down. hope this helps
Ryan |
05-07-2004, 01:17 PM | #4 |
just can't cover up my redneck
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Columbus OH
Posts: 11,414
|
Raising the pinion to reduce the angle does not help matters much. It creates a greater difference between the U-joint anges from the axle/transfercase.
This can cause vibrations. It's not as noticable on the front D/shaft because it doesn't run highway speeds like the rear does. |
05-07-2004, 01:39 PM | #5 |
Led Sled! Discs R 4 ME!
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Toms River, NJ, USA (Transplanted Hoosier)
Posts: 7,327
|
Thanks for the replies guys.
I originally was going to accomplish this with changing the back space on the wheels. After getting the rear with the stock wheels I can see that there is only about 3/4" +- clearance between the tie rod end and the wheel. As far as just cutting one side, one of the spring "u" bolts actually wraps around the end of the pumpkin. I suppose that could be relocated though. At this point it may be easier and more cost effective to fatten the front fenders. Also a concern is the change in angle for the steering connection. I will probably change over to a cross over steering anyway to help with alignment issues dealing with the adjustability of raising and lowering the truck (bags?) -Or- Find an axel the correct width. Anyone know of a Dana44 that is about 4-5" less in width than the 72s with the diff on the right side? I probably could leave it the way it is but I want to get the wheels tucked up into the fenders. Last edited by DennyB; 05-07-2004 at 09:17 PM. Reason: because CAD commands dont work on here...DUH (old habbits) |
05-07-2004, 02:46 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: sw colorado
Posts: 2,720
|
im not sure but you could check the width of a J-series jeep truck, some had 44 fronts and they might be a few inches narrower. i am not sure, just a thought. also i may be wrong but if you want to run a constant velocity joint on the front driveshaft the pinion has to be rotated to point directly at the t-case output for vibe free running. correct me if im wrong
Ryan |
05-07-2004, 04:48 PM | #7 |
just can't cover up my redneck
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Columbus OH
Posts: 11,414
|
ryanroo,
There are 2 reasons why you cannot just rotate the axle toward the transfer case. First and formost, is the angle of the balljoints. As you turn the housing upward at the pinion, the upper balljoint is angled forward in relation to the lower. You need to maintain that positive caster angle. This will cause serious handling problems when changed. Secondly, tilting the pinion upward reduces the angle of both u-joints, but not equally. The upper is reduced buy the fact that the lower yoke is effectively higher. The lower is reduced by rotating the pinion to be in-line with the driveshaft itself. These angles get more "mis-matched" with the more adjustment you make. This results in vibration, plus you shorten the life of the lower joint by keeping it from making any angular movement. They have a tendency to seize from lack of movement. |
05-07-2004, 06:18 PM | #8 |
user # 2756
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chesapeake, Virginia
Posts: 4,612
|
Try a dodge front axle. I know the dana60 is narrower dodge to chevy. The spring spacing is almos identical.
__________________
1970 K25, 8' stepside bed 350/465/205 44 up front, 60 in the rear 4.10s rolling on 33" Dunlop MTs 1986 K5, 350/465/208 Dana 60/14 bolt from a cucv 36" Super Swampers TSL/SX 1983 K20 w/ CUCV axles, 350/700R4/208 sitting on 37" Goodyears 1986 M1031 6.2 diesel, TH400/NP205 locker in the rear and a LS in the front, all stock for now..... 1986 K30, 350/400/205 dana 60 and 14 bolt. I kept the drivetrain. Body/bad and chassis are gone. 1981 K30, 350/465/205 dana 60 and dually 14 bolt. Has a G80, and a flat bed. Going to replace the flat bed. 1985 K20, 350/400/208 10 bolt and SF 14 bolt. I wonder where I can find some 1 tons. Hmmmmm |
05-07-2004, 09:16 PM | #9 |
Led Sled! Discs R 4 ME!
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Toms River, NJ, USA (Transplanted Hoosier)
Posts: 7,327
|
Thanks Jim,
Do you know how much more narrow? hmmm Wonder if I can change the hub and retain the chevy bolt pattern? |
05-08-2004, 03:00 AM | #10 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Rubber City
Posts: 5,498
|
Dodge axles arent that much narrower...my Dodge dana 60 is only 2" narrower than a GM unit. different axle, but the principle should be the same. I believe you can just swap the chevy outers onto the axle and it will work, if that is what you wanted to do. If its 8 lug, then of course you can skip this step.
__________________
1969 GMC K2500 1996 Honda Accord 2007 Kawasaki KLR 650 |
05-12-2004, 12:44 AM | #11 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Mt. Vernon, Texas
Posts: 65
|
I used a '76 Dana 44 from a Jeep Wagoneer and cut out 3&3/4" out of the long side to fit underneath my CJ 7. It is not easy but can be done with the right tools and attention to the caster. This axle had about the same caster as my original Jeep Dana 30 but be aware that some axles have 0 caster (International Scout for example) and would have to have both knuckles cut and rotated. Measure several times, cut axle tube, grind factory weld from tube/knuckle, remove knuckle and press onto shortened axle tube at correct rotation, weld in place. The axle shaft will then need to be shortened and resplined or as I did, have it cut and rewelded at a machine shop. I know this doesn't sound good but I'm running 38" swampers and the axle has held up great so far. Really should have another axle shaft made at new length. If you are interested in trying it yourself do a search on the web for shortening jeep dana 44.
__________________
'72 4x4 Blazer (in the works) |
05-12-2004, 10:49 AM | #12 |
Led Sled! Discs R 4 ME!
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Toms River, NJ, USA (Transplanted Hoosier)
Posts: 7,327
|
TexSparks,
Thanks for the insight. Do you remember what the stock width of the Wagoneers axel was? Thanks, Denny |
05-12-2004, 09:49 PM | #13 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Mt. Vernon, Texas
Posts: 65
|
I believe around 61" wheel mount surface to wheel mount surface, Jeep CJ is 56". Check out this site for some additional information www.jeeptech.com/convaxle/
__________________
'72 4x4 Blazer (in the works) |
05-13-2004, 10:39 PM | #14 |
Led Sled! Discs R 4 ME!
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Toms River, NJ, USA (Transplanted Hoosier)
Posts: 7,327
|
Great link Tex.
I'm still soaking it up It has given me more to think about too. From what I see the trick with this swap that I'm trying to do will be maintaining proper caster and driveability at the variable suspension heights. |
05-17-2004, 08:52 AM | #15 |
Ob-Gyn Kenobi
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 489
|
__________________
'85 GMC Shortbox... I used to have a firm handle on life....then it broke off. |
05-31-2004, 12:18 AM | #16 |
Led Sled! Discs R 4 ME!
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Toms River, NJ, USA (Transplanted Hoosier)
Posts: 7,327
|
Hey guys,
Just an update. I found a pair (front and rear) of dana 44s with the 373 ratio I was looking for. They are from a scout. Pumpkin on the right side and about 59 1/2 - 60" from the wheel mounting surfaces. |
Bookmarks |
|
|