![]() |
Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Registered User
![]() Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Toppenish, WA
Posts: 15,838
|
Re: TH400 transmission cross member / bracket vs TH350 for a Camaro subframe
I think I would have made a recess for the mount to get it down to the height I needed and still have a mount.
With the way you have it, I'd suggest cutting another piece of rubber to put on the bottom side of the crossmember and cut and drill a piece of flat bar to have rubber on both sides of the crossmember to let the trans wiggle a tad. Pretty much like the donut mounts on TF stock engines where there there is a rubber piece above and below the mounts to act as a two way cushion. Otherwise when the engine torques you might overstress an ear on the extension housing.
__________________
Founding member of the too many projects, too little time and money club. My ongoing truck projects: 48 Chev 3100 that will run a 292 Six. 71 GMC 2500 that is getting a Cad 500 transplant. 77 C 30 dualie, 454, 4 speed with a 10 foot flatbed and hoist. It does the heavy work and hauls the projects around. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Post Whore
![]() Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 10,899
|
Re: TH400 transmission cross member / bracket vs TH350 for a Camaro subframe
that actually sounds like a brilliant idea, thanks mate
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Keyser WV
Posts: 246
|
Re: TH400 transmission cross member / bracket vs TH350 for a Camaro subframe
Quote:
I would take the time and drop the crossmember down and use factory style mount. An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. Or do it right the first time will keep you from doing it again. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|