|
Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
06-11-2004, 11:36 PM
|
#1 |
|
Jostrans68
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Bloomington indiana
Posts: 1,182
|
fuel sending Unit differences
6 cyl has smaller tube? how much will this effect a 350 mild build? thanks Jack
__________________
 [CGTW Memberformer 67-72 now with a 96 silverado |
|
|
|
06-11-2004, 11:46 PM
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Knoxville Tenn.
Posts: 3,058
|
Should be fine (unless you are planing to turn the motor in the 7000 rpm range).
__________________
56 Chevy Bel-Air 2dr. HT (purchased new) 71 Chevy Cheyenne SWB PU (502HO) 65 GMC short bed step--work in progress and my gofer |
|
|
|
|
06-12-2004, 05:48 AM
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
 Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Rockville,In. USA
Posts: 3,722
|
1967-71 6cylinders did have a smaller diameter line which was 5/16", 1967-71 8-cylinders used 3/8" lines on sender & from tank to pump, as stated prior it should only effect very high RPM's and WOT acceleration.
GMCPaul |
|
|
|
|
06-12-2004, 10:13 AM
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 1,534
|
Maybe the GMC's were different. My '72 with 307 V8 came with the 5/16 lines.
__________________
'72 GMC SWB C1500 Custom, frame-off in progress. 383 SBC, 9:1CR, Comp Cams XE262H, Scat internal balanced crank, Eagle SIR 6" rods, Keith Black dish pistons, Dart Iron Eagle 72/180 heads, Weiand Stealth intake, Stewart stage I water pump, Holley 4bbl vac sec, TH350 with B&M Shift Improver Kit. 12 bolt positraction.  
|
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Linear Mode
