![]() |
Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Spartanburg,SC
Posts: 8
|
85 C-10 Alignment Issues (negative Camber)
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
just can't cover up my redneck
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Columbus OH
Posts: 11,414
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Watch out for your cornhole !
![]() Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Azle, Texas
Posts: 14,162
|
Longhair, you're wrong on this truck. More shims equals less negative camber on an 85 truck. The shims space the upper arm out from the frame. More shims equals positive camber gain.
If you have the upper arms shimmed all the way out, you must have like what over an inch of shims in there? The bolts are pretty long on these trucks. Something is definitelt bent on this thing. Either the frame rails are twisted in at the top or something is whacked with your control arms.
__________________
I'm on the Instagram- @Gearhead_Kevin |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
just can't cover up my redneck
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Columbus OH
Posts: 11,414
|
Wow, I don't recall ever seeing anything with the upper control arm mounted to the outside of the mounting bracket.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Watch out for your cornhole !
![]() Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Azle, Texas
Posts: 14,162
|
Here's a picture Longhair.
__________________
I'm on the Instagram- @Gearhead_Kevin |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
just can't cover up my redneck
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Columbus OH
Posts: 11,414
|
You're absolutely right.
Something is definately bent on SMOKEY85's truck. There is no way you should ever need more shims than would go on that. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Spartanburg,SC
Posts: 8
|
Thanks for the input, I will try to measure frame and hope the frame rails are rolled in. That should be an easy fix. (See picts. Thanks)
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|