|
Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
02-12-2020, 02:33 AM
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: San Jose
Posts: 4
|
60 Chevy c-10 upper control arm
Dose anyone know if there is a way to replace only the upper control arm on the 60-62 c-10 with a tubular control arm for possibly better drivability ? Thanks
|
|
|
|
02-12-2020, 08:37 AM
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Hayes Va
Posts: 4,569
|
Re: 60 Chevy c-10 upper control arm
The geometry doesn't change so the swap will not improve the drivability. A good alignment with more caster than the stock settings will help. If you can get 3 or 4 degrees it really helps. There is a caster mod thread in the suspension section that may not work on yours but a good read. There is also the make it handle thread thats is very long but covers a lot of what improves the handling.
Jimmy
__________________
60 to 66 Chevy and GMC window decals http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=661131 Good friends, good food and a hotrod what else do you need? 1966 BBW long fleet Daily driver 1965 BBW short fleet Sold and going to a good home 1965 Suburban 2003 3500 Duramax 2005 Ultra Classic |
|
|
|
|
02-12-2020, 11:23 AM
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Beautiful BC, Canada, eh?!
Posts: 2,291
|
Re: 60 Chevy c-10 upper control arm
If a tubular upper arm positions the balljoint back a bit, you'd get the extra caster you want.
The lower arms cannot be easily moved forward for caster like the 63+ can.
__________________
1961 Apache: "Grabber Orange" Shortboxed, pancake, step-notch, air-ride, turbo, LS 1977 Silverado: Shortboxed & dropped, potato-potato V8 Pontiac Firefly (Chevy Sprint): The ultimate engine swap: 5.7L in a 1.0L bag Lotus Super 7 Replica: Scratch-built street-legal rollerskate |
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Linear Mode
