The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1973 - 1987 Chevrolet & GMC Squarebody Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-11-2018, 01:15 PM   #26
Fishandgame
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Desert1957 View Post
I thought about this idea on my crew cab , but it would be the lowest thing hanging down . not sure if you have an issue if you could ever stop the fuel flow to the ground.
I thought about that and considered a ball valve at each tank. It wouldn’t have to sit too low if the bulkhead attached to the tank bottom were cast or shaped nearly flat. And the manifold pipe was slender and wider. The bulkhead could even have a curve matching the tank bottom leaving the tank the lowest still. It doesn’t take much in pipe diameter. I used 3/4 PVC on my water barrels and the level stayed even between both as fast as a full flowing garden hose could put it in one. Even if the fitting opening was an inch or so above the bottom line of the tanks who cares. So you don’t get a gallon out of the tank without the pick up. You don’t get that anyway with the pick up tube or really don’t want to get it since any water goes to the bottom if there were any. So 19 or 39 gallons if both tanks are 20 gallons. I’ll have to research a weld in bung fitting to accept an AN fitting. Heck it could be any fitting type so long as it sealed fuel. I almost have myself talked into trying it. As long as you could route the line across the chassis without having any part above the lower tank bung it would work. A couple service valves and presto. My chassis is in blasting and paint. I’ll look at it when I get it back.
Posted via Mobile Device
Fishandgame is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2018, 01:38 AM   #27
donw1986
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Santa Clarita CA
Posts: 80
Re: dual tanks with late model EFI?

The later model c10s from i think 83 to 87, i have a 86, the transfer valve can handle up to 65 psi iinstalled a msd efi on my 86 put a pump in each tank and wired the power to the pump through the switch on dash using an 87 switch, if you have an 87 should be easy the early model c10 had a low pressure valve but new is good to go
donw1986 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2020, 03:23 PM   #28
Ford Assassin
Registered User
 
Ford Assassin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Jackson, Ca.
Posts: 674
Re: dual tanks with late model EFI?

Another run at the top.

How about using in-tank TBI pumps, through external filters, then to the switch tank valve, then into the high pressure pump, the to a regulator, then into the fuel rails?
__________________
Cable

-K5 Blazer 2wd: 6.0 LQ4, 7875 Turbo, Tick Stage II Turbo Cam, Built 4L80e, RevMax Billet 3600, 9.5" 14 Bolt
-Chevy 3+3 Crew Cab Dually: Cummins 12v P-Pump Swap, Compound Turbos, A2W Intercooler, NV4500HD, 4wd conversion, Radius Arms, Coilovers, Crossover Steering, etc
Build Thread: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=803608
Ford Assassin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2020, 03:40 PM   #29
layinrocker65
Registered User
 
layinrocker65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: California
Posts: 521
Re: dual tanks with late model EFI?

I have about 20k miles on the dual tank setup in my 74. Used EFI tanks with the pumps in the tanks, the soft EFI rated fuel line to the high pressure valve, then to a corvette fuel filter regulator, then a single line up to my LS rails. I can switch tanks on the fly without even noticing.

The only issue I’m having now it that my newly installed Dakota digital RTX gauges don’t seem to like the fuel signal going through a switch so it doesn’t read correctly. Had no issues with the stock gauges. I track my mileage(~20mpg) so it’s not a huge deal right now but I need to figure it out.
__________________
‘53 GMC COE stock
‘53 Chevy 3100 LSA/TR6060 http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s....php?t=805949‘
'70 Chevy C10 LWB 350/sm465
‘74 Chevy C10 SWB 5.3/4L80e, Vintage Air, Dakota Digital, US Mags
layinrocker65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2020, 03:49 PM   #30
Ford Assassin
Registered User
 
Ford Assassin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Jackson, Ca.
Posts: 674
Re: dual tanks with late model EFI?

Quote:
Originally Posted by layinrocker65 View Post
I have about 20k miles on the dual tank setup in my 74. Used EFI tanks with the pumps in the tanks, the soft EFI rated fuel line to the high pressure valve, then to a corvette fuel filter regulator, then a single line up to my LS rails. I can switch tanks on the fly without even noticing.

The only issue I’m having now it that my newly installed Dakota digital RTX gauges don’t seem to like the fuel signal going through a switch so it doesn’t read correctly. Had no issues with the stock gauges. I track my mileage(~20mpg) so it’s not a huge deal right now but I need to figure it out.
I was hoping to avoid buying two more pumps since I already own a Walbro 255 in line from another project. Hence using the stock in tank TBI pump(s) to feed the in line Walbro.

I have the VHX Dakota dash and haven't had any issues with the fuel gauge.
__________________
Cable

-K5 Blazer 2wd: 6.0 LQ4, 7875 Turbo, Tick Stage II Turbo Cam, Built 4L80e, RevMax Billet 3600, 9.5" 14 Bolt
-Chevy 3+3 Crew Cab Dually: Cummins 12v P-Pump Swap, Compound Turbos, A2W Intercooler, NV4500HD, 4wd conversion, Radius Arms, Coilovers, Crossover Steering, etc
Build Thread: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=803608
Ford Assassin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2020, 05:30 PM   #31
layinrocker65
Registered User
 
layinrocker65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: California
Posts: 521
Re: dual tanks with late model EFI?

It’s been so long since I did the swap but I’m pretty sure I used the TBI fuel pumps I’m my tanks. I previously had an in line walbro and hated it. Too loud. There is no reason to feed an in line pump with an in the tank pump. Your just over complicating a pretty simple system.
__________________
‘53 GMC COE stock
‘53 Chevy 3100 LSA/TR6060 http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s....php?t=805949‘
'70 Chevy C10 LWB 350/sm465
‘74 Chevy C10 SWB 5.3/4L80e, Vintage Air, Dakota Digital, US Mags
layinrocker65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2020, 05:41 PM   #32
Ford Assassin
Registered User
 
Ford Assassin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Jackson, Ca.
Posts: 674
Re: dual tanks with late model EFI?

Quote:
Originally Posted by layinrocker65 View Post
It’s been so long since I did the swap but I’m pretty sure I used the TBI fuel pumps I’m my tanks. I previously had an in line walbro and hated it. Too loud. There is no reason to feed an in line pump with an in the tank pump. Your just over complicating a pretty simple system.
No way you ran stock TBI pumps feeding a LS 4 BAR (58 PSI) system. Stock TBI 87 is a 13 psi system, not even BAR 1.

I appreciate your response, but how am I overcomplicating when I just wanna add a single in line pump to an existing setup? Seems like the LEAST complicated (and most cost effective )way to get it done.

Fuel pump noise doesn't bother me, most can't be heard when the vehicle is running anyway. I am running dual Bosch 044's on my turbo K5 and a Magnafuel 1000HP rated pump on my drag car. That pump is loud, like 2 stroke chainsaw loud.
__________________
Cable

-K5 Blazer 2wd: 6.0 LQ4, 7875 Turbo, Tick Stage II Turbo Cam, Built 4L80e, RevMax Billet 3600, 9.5" 14 Bolt
-Chevy 3+3 Crew Cab Dually: Cummins 12v P-Pump Swap, Compound Turbos, A2W Intercooler, NV4500HD, 4wd conversion, Radius Arms, Coilovers, Crossover Steering, etc
Build Thread: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=803608
Ford Assassin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2020, 07:37 PM   #33
marcoman
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Albuquerque New Mexico
Posts: 9
Re: dual tanks with late model EFI?

Quote:
Originally Posted by layinrocker65 View Post
It’s been so long since I did the swap but I’m pretty sure I used the TBI fuel pumps I’m my tanks. I previously had an in line walbro and hated it. Too loud. There is no reason to feed an in line pump with an in the tank pump. Your just over complicating a pretty simple system.
Wow, so where did you get those pumps from? I'm curious because I have an '84 GMC shorty and plan to do an LS powerplant in the future. BTW You guys are a great resource!
marcoman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2020, 10:17 AM   #34
naphtali5725
Registered User
 
naphtali5725's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: NC
Posts: 1,101
Re: dual tanks with late model EFI?

anyone ever used one of these?

https://www.robbmcperformance.com/pr...owersurge.html
__________________
My build thread...
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=515829

Disabled Veteran
82nd Airborne Division
Operations: Desert Shield, Desert Storm, and Uphold Democracy
naphtali5725 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2020, 02:01 PM   #35
hatzie
Moderator
 
hatzie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Wentworth, NH
Posts: 4,977
Re: dual tanks with late model EFI?

Quote:
Originally Posted by naphtali5725 View Post
That's essentially an expensive surge tank with a built in fuel pump. You probably still need a pressure regulator if you can't request a specific fuel pump.

A surge tank system uses the in-tank pumps as lift pumps to keep the surge tank filled. The stock pumps will flow more GPH at the lower pressure demanded to keep the surge tank filled. 5-7PSI is what I'd guess the pressure in the surge tank will level out at. I bet the TBI pumps that normally run twice that pressure will flow plenty of fuel to keep the high pressure pump happy. They'll run cooler with the higher flow and lower pressure as well.

You can build your own.
The surge tank should have four fuel lines.
-A feed and return to-from the engine for the high pressure EFI system. You'll get more fuel returned than you might think.
-A low pressure fill and return from-to the tank(s).
-A high pressure fuel pump.

You should be able to mount the surge tank in the engine bay to keep it safe from road debris. Tuck it down by the battery tray and the radiator support to hide it.

You can run the stock dual tank valve and lines with a modern EFI setup using this configuration.

As noted earlier on. You could also use the stock dual tank setups from the LS powered vans that used the PCM to control the tanks as if they were one tank. You'll likely have to roll your own fuel pump/sender module mount for the donors fuel pump/sender modules.
__________________
1959 M35A2 LDT465-1D SOLD
1967 Dodge W200 B383, NP420/NP201 SOLD
1969 Dodge Polara 500 B383, A833 SOLD
1972 Ford F250 FE390, NP435/NP205 SOLD
1976 Chevy K20, 6.5L, NV4500/NP208 SOLD
1986 M1008 CUCV SOLD
2000 GMC C2500, TD6.5L, NV4500
2005 Chevy Silverado LS 2500HD 6.0L 4L80E/NP263
2009 Impala SS LS4 V8


RTFM... GM Parts Books, GM Schematics, GM service manuals, and GM training materials...Please include at least the year and model in your threads. It'll be easier to answer your questions.
And please let us know if and how your repairs were successful.

Last edited by hatzie; 02-12-2020 at 02:12 PM.
hatzie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2020, 03:29 PM   #36
naphtali5725
Registered User
 
naphtali5725's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: NC
Posts: 1,101
Re: dual tanks with late model EFI?

thanks hatzie!
__________________
My build thread...
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=515829

Disabled Veteran
82nd Airborne Division
Operations: Desert Shield, Desert Storm, and Uphold Democracy
naphtali5725 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com