The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1947 - 1959 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-11-2020, 09:40 PM   #1
mobileortho
Registered User
 
mobileortho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hampton, VA
Posts: 886
Re: EFI vs TPI

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1project2many View Post
Lots to consider if you want a detailed discussion. The TPI configuration with long runners and small diameter tubes provides a bunch of low end torque. This system performs well when combined with numerically low gears and/or overdrive transmission. If you plan to run at 1400-1700 RPM on the highway or love doing burnouts with a lower hp engine then TPI is a nice choice.

TBI like the Sniper or a GM system can provide more consistent fuel delivery than a carburetor. Your choice of intake manifold really determines whether or not the TBI makes power where you need it. If you replace the TPI on a stock engine with a short runner, small plenum production-type manifold with TBI it's possible you will feel the vehicle has lost performance off the line.

Tuning an efi system can be a challenge. Aftermarket systems often have features built in to make tuning easier. They don't always work as expected and you may need professional assistance. Tuning a GM computer can be more challenging. Most of the work to figure out what to change falls on the owner or tuner. Many folks figure it out but there is a steep learning curve. Some folks just offer to pay to have it done.

The age and power of the computer makes a difference in how well the vehicle responds. For example older TPI systems with a mass air flow sensor will benefit to an upgrade from a 90-91 Corvette or 91 Camaro ecm. TBI systems from late '80s to early '90s cars and trucks can benefit from an upgrade to the 94-95 GM Pickup truck pcm. These changes require reworking the wire harness and can be intimidating to some people. Aftermarket systems may or may not have more powerful and more reliable computers. Aftermarket companies may not have the resources available to spend millions of $$ on research, development, and testing of their controller.

I wish the answer was simple, but all those words really boil down to "It depends." Good luck.
Great info! Thanks!
__________________
Robert C.

1950 3600
3600 re-do, shortening it up

If it's true what they say, "You learn from your mistakes,"
I'm a Genius in the making.
mobileortho is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com