Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
12-04-2020, 08:06 PM | #26 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Salmon Arm BC
Posts: 202
|
Re: 68 C10 Lowering dilemma
That looks like the Russell performance logo and a 1990 build date to me. http://www.russellperformance.com/ They are owned by Edelbrock now but a quick web search reveals they used to produce a few suspension parts back in the 90's.
__________________
1970 C10 l/b 292/4spd Build: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=811062 |
12-05-2020, 12:52 PM | #27 | |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 164
|
Re: 68 C10 Lowering dilemma
Quote:
|
|
12-05-2020, 12:58 PM | #28 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,068
|
Re: 68 C10 Lowering dilemma
Quote:
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol. |
|
12-05-2020, 03:11 PM | #29 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Post Falls, ID
Posts: 900
|
Re: 68 C10 Lowering dilemma
http://russellperformance.com/
I don't think they make spindles any longer. EDIT: ...I just looked back through this post, I guess I was a little late with that information.
__________________
Insert clever text here: Last edited by Greasey Harley; 12-05-2020 at 03:16 PM. |
12-05-2020, 04:08 PM | #30 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 164
|
Re: 68 C10 Lowering dilemma
After several Google searches there was nothing helpful at all.
|
12-13-2020, 05:18 PM | #31 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 164
|
Re: 68 C10 Lowering dilemma
UPDATE:
Well after watching several videos and tons of research I'm guessing I have 5 or 6 inch drop springs (as lolife99 suggested) in the rear with 2 inch lowering blocks so total drop of 7 or 8 inches. So basically a fraction of an inch from the factory bump stop and about 1-1/2 inches from the tubing hitting the frame. In other words limited travel. I was going to C notch the frame with a CPP kit but if I do it's likely going to cause the rear end housing to hit the bed floor and my over the axle exhaust. With the tubing jacked up touching the frame I have about 1-1/4 inches before the diff hits the bed floor and about an inch before the tubing hits the over axle exhaust. I guess my choices are to C notch it and install bump stops to limit travel or remove the 2 inch lowering blocks and see how it looks. I was also thinking to try leaving things as they are and cut the factory bump stops so I get a little more travel but not hit the frame. I do not want to alter the exhaust or the bed floor to accommodate the extra room I'll have with the c notch. Guys I've been working as a mechanic most of my life so I'm no stranger to all of this but I'm NOT familiar with the drop modifications available and the consequences for doing it. Lack of experience on my part. I removed the rear springs to try and Identify them with no luck. They are free standing at 9-1/2 inches and have a .692" wire diameter. What I DON'T UNDERSTAND is why the front sits as low as it does with ONLY drop spindles and stock springs with new lower control arms. I know they are stock replacements because I installed them. Any suggestions are appreciated! Thanks Jim Last edited by GMJimmy; 12-13-2020 at 06:58 PM. |
12-13-2020, 06:08 PM | #32 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,068
|
Re: 68 C10 Lowering dilemma
Quote:
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol. |
|
12-13-2020, 06:15 PM | #33 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 164
|
Re: 68 C10 Lowering dilemma
|
12-13-2020, 10:53 PM | #34 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,068
|
Re: 68 C10 Lowering dilemma
I went back to look @ the pics again.
Your front wheel/tire combo measures @ 26.6". Given the gap above to the fender lip, I'll say 3" spindle drop up front. At 27.7" in the back, probably 3" springs & 2" blocks.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol. |
12-13-2020, 11:04 PM | #35 | |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 164
|
Re: 68 C10 Lowering dilemma
Quote:
Thanks for your opinions on this. I guess I'll have to figure out what to do about the rear drop. Not quite enough clearance to leave it but a C notch will create other issues. I may have to live with a bumpy ride? |
|
12-14-2020, 07:02 PM | #36 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 164
|
Re: 68 C10 Lowering dilemma
Another thing that concerns me is the rear shocks. Although they don't bottom out at full compression, they travel well beyond the spring at full extension. If the springs weren't bolted top and bottom they would fall out when the suspension was completely extended. What do guys do in this situation?
|
12-14-2020, 07:23 PM | #37 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,068
|
Re: 68 C10 Lowering dilemma
Quote:
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=451200
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol. |
|
12-14-2020, 07:56 PM | #38 | |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 164
|
Re: 68 C10 Lowering dilemma
Quote:
Usually it's the shocks bottoming out that keeps the suspension from fully extending and springs from falling out. Suspension fully extended sitting on the shocks. I have shock relocation brackets installed. Last edited by GMJimmy; 12-14-2020 at 08:03 PM. |
|
12-14-2020, 08:38 PM | #39 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,068
|
Re: 68 C10 Lowering dilemma
The coils should be bolted in top & bottom.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol. |
12-14-2020, 09:08 PM | #40 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 164
|
Re: 68 C10 Lowering dilemma
|
12-14-2020, 10:06 PM | #41 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,068
|
Re: 68 C10 Lowering dilemma
I figured it was something like that. But sometimes 'ya never know so its worth mentioning.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol. |
12-19-2020, 12:33 AM | #42 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 164
|
Re: 68 C10 Lowering dilemma
I'm a little concerned about my shocks after I install my C notch. Can anyone help me with a part number for some shocks with a 6 inch drop? Mine will be close to bottoming out with the extra travel.
Thanks! |
12-19-2020, 05:39 PM | #43 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Carlos MN
Posts: 2,138
|
Re: 68 C10 Lowering dilemma
I got my shocks from Bell tech. I called them and told what I have (6"rear drop/4" front drop) and they gave me the part number for the front and rear. They offer two types. They told me to buy the less expensive model.
|
12-19-2020, 08:38 PM | #44 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 164
|
Re: 68 C10 Lowering dilemma
Thank you! Iv'e been trying to find a parts source that doesn't answer AHH What, when I ask about shocks for a dropped C10!
|
Bookmarks |
|
|