![]() |
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: North-central Virginia
Posts: 1,105
|
Re: 2.73 rear end
The very low ratios were usually paired with the straight six engines. Those engines are torque monsters, particularly right off idle, but they don't rev high. I would look into a built 292, with an emphasis on bottom-end torque instead of HP. It should feel and drive similar to a diesel when all's said and done. A manual transmission will make it all the better.
I'm driving a bone-stock 1981 2wd f150 with a 300-i6, four-speed manual, 2.73 gears, and 28" tires. It's a hoot just tooling around local country roads. The bottom-end torque is unbelievable, and fuel economy is pushing 20 mpg on longer trips.
__________________
1987 C6P V20 truck, 2010 LMG 5.3, AFM delete, 2010 Camaro exhaust manifolds, 1997 nv4500, 1991 np241c, hydroboost, 2005 14bff axle & driveshaft, drop-n-lock gooseneck, 4.10 gears, stock suspension, rims, and tires. Still a work in progress. Any questions or suggestions are welcome! |
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|