The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-10-2006, 05:47 PM   #1
MisterMan
Account Suspended
 
MisterMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Visalia, California
Posts: 286
Question Weight savings

ive noticed, just with the raditaor off, all fluids drained, fan, alternator, steering pump, carb, drive shaft and engine lift brackets removed, then front end poped up quite a bit. seems as tho its really a load off.

any one trying to save weight on these trucks?? what have yall done?? pics?? i could just imagine, alum drive shaft, alum heads exc, these trucks would be a lil "snappier".

--den
MisterMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2006, 07:56 PM   #2
farside847
Registered User
 
farside847's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 995
Re: Weight savings

Possibly increase MPG too. I read somewhere that every 100lbs could equate to 1% increase in mileage. Have no idea if it applies to big ass trucks though

Fiberglass body panels would probably save a ton of weight real fast, but might not look as original as you might like....
__________________
1971 Chevy C10 Shortbed Stepside, 307v8 3-on-the-tree
farside847 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2006, 08:31 PM   #3
Longhorn Man
its all about the +6 inches
 
Longhorn Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hilliard Ohio
Posts: 2,690
Re: Weight savings

I think the aerodynamics of a barn door hold them back from getting real good MPG. While I don't wanna call BS on the guys who claim more that 22 MPG.. I do find it hard to swallow.
I know I have a much stronger suspention than most of the trucks here, (one ton with HD front springs and overloads in back) When I dropped the caddy motor in, it only dropped like an inch, maybe two inches from no motor verses 500.
Longhorn Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2006, 08:53 PM   #4
Psycho71
Registered User
 
Psycho71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Kaufman, Tx
Posts: 827
Re: Weight savings

Years ago, a buddy of mine had a 72' longbed, cut to shortie, w/ late model bed & snugtop on it. We used to take it to a local dragstrip and make laps in it, just kids havin' fun ya know.. The truck would run 10.50's with me in it, and 10.40's w/o me in it (1/8 mile). I only weighed 165lbs at the time. And we checked this several times. Later he had a 66 dodge w/BBC narrowed 9" and alot of juice. We were at the track one night, and I forget why but we took the hood off. The truck picked up about a tenth on the next pass. So we took the tailgate off, another tenth off the ET. This was a full body truck, w/camaro clip and ladder bars, that weighed about 5000lbs when rolling down the road. We then considered removing the front fenders, and doors to get it to run some 6.50's, but they wouldn't let us run it w/o doors. LOL. My thought on the dodge, given the the panels we removed didn't quite weigh what I did was...Removing the hood changed the balance too, putting a little more weight on the rear end? Removing the tailgate reduced drag on the big end too, helping MPH and thus ET? I could be completely wrong on this theory, but the time slips don't lie.
This is my experience with trimming fat, 150-165lbs=1/10 in the 1/8 mile on heavier vehicles. No math involved, just the clock at the track and the scale in my bathroom.


Jay
__________________
You only need two tools in life - WD-40 and Duct Tape. If it doesn't move and should, use the WD-40. If it shouldn't move and does, use the duct tape.

If a hammer doesn't fix it, you have an electrical problem!



Slot Cars, 1:24 Scale, 100MPH@100,000RPM, fastest things on wheels!
Psycho71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2006, 09:30 PM   #5
Karl Hoh
A little east of nowhere
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: LaBroquerie,Manitoba Canada
Posts: 168
Re: Weight savings

The old dragracers rule of thumb- for every 100lbs you take off, you will pick up a .10 faster ET
__________________
68 C10 250 4spd
69 C20 327 4spd
69 910 250 3spd
80 K10 350 4spd
76 C60 366 5spd school bus

"THERE'S NOTHING YOU CAN BREAK THAT SOMEONE CAN'T BE PAID TO REPAIR"
Karl Hoh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2006, 11:04 PM   #6
Jeffs65GMC
4 headlights > 2
 
Jeffs65GMC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Greenville, NC
Posts: 52
Re: Weight savings

I've also heard ~50lbs is good for around 3hp...adds up fast.

I can't wait to get a 350 under the hood of my 65, dressed out according to the factory specs, it should weigh in at around 3200lbs with 10 gallons of gas...she's gonna scoot!
__________________
1965 GMC 1000 fleetside (for sale)

1989 Jeep Wrangler (currently torn down, will return again)

1998 Jeep Cherokee (daily driver)
Jeffs65GMC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2006, 11:12 PM   #7
409biscayne
Senior Member
 
409biscayne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Spokane , Wash.
Posts: 790
Re: Weight savings

Quote:
Originally Posted by Karl Hoh
The old dragracers rule of thumb- for every 100lbs you take off, you will pick up a .10 faster ET
That works out about right at our 1/4 mile , however when i pulled my tailgate i went 2 1/2 tenths quicker , could have been the air , it was over 2 weekends . Hmmmmn wonder how heavy those buddy buckets are .
__________________
Can-Am Motorsports
37 Chev Coupe 331 4 speed 5.13 posi . ex-gasser .
64 Biscayne 409 2x4 4 speed 4.11 posi
65 Nova Wagon Drag Car 383 t400 (Dragin-Wagon)
68 c10 cst 396 t400 a/c buckets lwb 4.11 posi (SOLD)
409biscayne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2006, 09:31 AM   #8
jacobs
Registered User
 
jacobs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: 9000' Mountain Man
Posts: 326
Re: Weight savings

When I installed 4X4 and snowplow mounts under a c10, it increased the weight by 1200 lbs and reduced fuel mileage by 25%
jacobs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2006, 09:38 AM   #9
67ChevyRedneck
Hittin E-Z Street on Mud Tires
 
67ChevyRedneck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 23,090
Re: Weight savings

I had an 86 toyota truck once.... I was painting it and had it down to the cab, motor, and frame. I decided to go for a ride one day.... Holy crap if that little sucker didn't absolutely haul ass! I had fun rippin through the 5 speed. Got it all back together and painted..... back to a slow ass no-power truck again
__________________
Jesse James
1967 C10 SWB Stepside: 350/700R4/3.73
1965 Ford Mustang: 289/T5-5spd/3.25 Trac-Loc
1968 Pontiac Firebird: Project Fire Chicken!
2015 Silverado Double Cab 5.3L Z71
2001 Jeep Wrangler Sport 4.0L 5spd
2020 Chevrolet Equinox Premium 2.0L Turbo
2011 Mustang V6 ~ Wife's ride
American Born, Country by the Grace of God
1967 CST Shop Truck Rebuild!
My 1967 C-10 Build Thread
My Vintage Air A/C Install
Project "On a Dime"
Trying my hand at Home Renovation!
1965 Mustang Modifications!
67ChevyRedneck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2006, 05:49 PM   #10
MisterMan
Account Suspended
 
MisterMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Visalia, California
Posts: 286
Re: Weight savings

so you see, weight is a huge savings, my dirt bike is 240 lbs max, loaded /w/ fuel and tools.... it puts out 48hp stock and now puts prox 53.... that weight to power is amazing.... wish the ol' chevy was the same.... ne one hae ne logical ideas in saving weight???
MisterMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2006, 03:37 AM   #11
Americanrider
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: NW, WA.
Posts: 1,421
Re: Weight savings

I ran my 67 dumper accross the certifited scales without tailgate, front bumper, spare, jack, lug wrench, and almost empty tank= 4820lbs with all of that back on and the same amount of gas it's at 5080.

I'm trying to figure if there would be any significant change it I went to a flatbed & removeable sideboards. [Kinda like Yukon Jack's grey truck]

I know I could drop a few pounds by switching to alloy wheels and aluminium intake and disk brakes on the rear. Alum Heads are way out of my price range for the next few years. I want to build a cow-killer bumber and install a winch but I might opt for just a 2" receiver front bumper and a cradle mount winch that can be carried only when needed and stored indoors during our rainy season.
Americanrider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2006, 10:54 AM   #12
wibilly
Senior Member
 
wibilly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: northwestern wi
Posts: 2,111
Re: Weight savings

no fat chicks
__________________
common sense isn't so common anymore
wibilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2006, 11:37 AM   #13
farside847
Registered User
 
farside847's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 995
Re: Weight savings

Quote:
Originally Posted by wibilly
no fat chicks
__________________
1971 Chevy C10 Shortbed Stepside, 307v8 3-on-the-tree
farside847 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2006, 06:04 PM   #14
MisterMan
Account Suspended
 
MisterMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Visalia, California
Posts: 286
Re: Weight savings

Quote:
Originally Posted by Americanrider
I ran my 67 dumper accross the certifited scales without tailgate, front bumper, spare, jack, lug wrench, and almost empty tank= 4820lbs with all of that back on and the same amount of gas it's at 5080.

I'm trying to figure if there would be any significant change it I went to a flatbed & removeable sideboards. [Kinda like Yukon Jack's grey truck]

I know I could drop a few pounds by switching to alloy wheels and aluminium intake and disk brakes on the rear. Alum Heads are way out of my price range for the next few years. I want to build a cow-killer bumber and install a winch but I might opt for just a 2" receiver front bumper and a cradle mount winch that can be carried only when needed and stored indoors during our rainy season.
now thats what im looking for!!! thank you!!!... ne one else crazy like us???

no fat chicks.... they need lov'n too, even if she does make ur bench seat look like one big bucket.
MisterMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2021, 02:42 PM   #15
mookandairin
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Germantown
Posts: 58
Re: Weight savings

So, unless I missed something somewhere I dont think I read what a 1965 Chevy C10 short bed stepside weighs in at I am hoping it is under 3400#'s as I am building myself a twin turbo back halved truck with ladder bars, cage etc and I would love to know what they weigh out the gate if possible?
Please...........with a cherry on top.
mookandairin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2021, 06:23 PM   #16
geezer#99
Registered User
 
geezer#99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Bowser
Posts: 13,731
Re: Weight savings

My 65 short step with six banger and 3ott weighed 4200 lbs with a 1/2 tank of fuel.
Verified that weight at 3 different scales.
geezer#99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2021, 09:00 PM   #17
special-K
Special Order

 
special-K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mt Airy, MD
Posts: 85,851
Re: Weight savings

First of all, what Germantown? Maryland? I don't know if you could get one down that far below 2 tons.
__________________
"BUILDING A BETTER WAY TO SERVE THE USA"......67/72......"The New Breed"

GMC '67 C1500 Wideside Super Custom SWB: 327/M22/3.42 posi.........."The '67" (project)
GMC '72 K2500 Wideside Sierra Custom Camper: 350/TH350/4.10 Power-Lok..."The '72" (rolling)
Tim

"Don't call me a redneck. I'm a rough cut country gentleman"

R.I.P. ~ East Side Low Life ~ El Jay ~ 72BLUZ ~ Fasteddie69 ~ Ron586 ~ 67ChevyRedneck ~ Grumpy Old Man ~
special-K is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com