![]() |
Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: harvard, il. USA
Posts: 402
|
Brake booster differences
R&R of entire brake system on a 1970 GMC 2500
While I expected it to be a bit different, the length of the rod to the interior pedal on the new looks short. ![]() Ideas appreciated. Thanks much...don t. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
![]() Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Cheraw
Posts: 1,300
|
Re: Brake booster differences
That booster just doesn't look right for a 72.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: PNW
Posts: 553
|
Re: Brake booster differences
Isn't it adjustable? Most aftermarket jobbies are.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,457
|
Re: Brake booster differences
Looks like a '67-'70 dual diaphragm Bendix. Some '67's are a little different, don't have the reinforcing tabs welded on the back half. These are for 4 wheel drum brakes. Factory disc brake booster/master cylinders are different, and use a different length pushrod. Be careful, using the wrong push rod = no brakes!
__________________
1967 GMC CM-2500 Camper Cruiser, 351E V-6, NP 435 4 speed, Dana 60, and factory A/C. 2012 GMC K-3500 WT regular cab, 6.0L Vortec, 6L90. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|