The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-01-2022, 09:59 AM   #1
pappy 2
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: ord, NE.
Posts: 98
The Low Down

Need to raise the back end, Bottoms out on the axel bumpers, that have been cut down by 1 inch. Started out with 4in drop springs and 2 inch lowering blocks, was too much. Took out lowering blocks, but still bottoms out on the bumpers. So may need to go to 3 inch springs or back to stock springs and put the 2 inch bocks back in. Have not seen 2 inch drop springs offered. Also probably need to remove the rear shock locators and go back to stock mounts.

Any advise, other than air bags, to this matter would be appreciated.

Thanks to all who reply.
pappy 2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2022, 11:07 AM   #2
1970 CST Short Wide
Senior Moment
 
1970 CST Short Wide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Pittsburg Ca
Posts: 4,107
Re: The Low Down

C Notch
__________________
1970 CST LS 1 6 speed Ford 9 inch Detroit Tru Track, Dakota Didgital, Vintage Air, QA1 Coil Overs Front & Rear Lots of FUN
2013 GMC PU, Oldest Son
71 GMC LWB. QA1 Suspension, Angry SB. Youngest Son
2019 GMC Diesil Dually. Youngest Son
2017 Toyota SUV Daughters car
2018 Traverse , Wife’s Ride
Pittsburg Ca
94565
1970 CST Short Wide is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2022, 01:21 PM   #3
67C10Step
Registered User
 
67C10Step's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Beebe, AR
Posts: 2,454
Re: The Low Down

Just to make sure I am reading correctly: You had 4" springs + 2" blocks for a total of 6" drop(?). Not surprised that bottomed out on a non C-notch truck. You removed the 2" blocks for now a 4" drop and you are still hitting the bump stops? That is a bit surprising but there are bump stops made for lowered rigs, I have some on mine. Gives you about another 1" before hitting. I don't think you need a C-notch with only 4" of drop.
__________________
1967 C10
1980 Jeep CJ5
2020 Toyota 4Runner
2024 Toyota Tundra
67C10Step is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2022, 01:53 PM   #4
special-K
Special Order

 
special-K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mt Airy, MD
Posts: 85,861
Re: The Low Down

From what I've seen, with a 6" drop you get about an inch before hitting the bump stops. Trimming those usually eliminates bottoming out, with nothing in the bed. My project has 4/6 drop and I want to be able to use my bed or tow. I do not want to cut my frame for c-notches. I was thinking I'd go to 4" rear springs because I have never heard of people having bottoming issues with 4". I also like the look the of stock rake, but 4" lower. I also like the leveled look that 4/6 gives. So I think what I will do is install bags in place of coils. That way I can change the stance according to my mood and adjust the rear up for hauling/towing. Not only raising rear but also increasing weight capacity.
__________________
"BUILDING A BETTER WAY TO SERVE THE USA"......67/72......"The New Breed"

GMC '67 C1500 Wideside Super Custom SWB: 327/M22/3.42 posi.........."The '67" (project)
GMC '72 K2500 Wideside Sierra Custom Camper: 350/TH350/4.10 Power-Lok..."The '72" (rolling)
Tim

"Don't call me a redneck. I'm a rough cut country gentleman"

R.I.P. ~ East Side Low Life ~ El Jay ~ 72BLUZ ~ Fasteddie69 ~ Ron586 ~ 67ChevyRedneck ~ Grumpy Old Man ~
special-K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2022, 04:16 PM   #5
CAMAROBOY68SS
Senior Member

 
CAMAROBOY68SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: Hillsboro, Oregon
Posts: 441
Re: The Low Down

I have 6" drop thats 4" springs and 2" blocks with no c notch and unless I hit a hard drop/pothole it never bottoms out. I cut the bump stops down. I do have relocated and shorter shocks, so you if your still using stock length shocks and in the stock location that could be a possible reason to your issue.
__________________
The Twins:
1968 C10 SWB - Blue 327/5 Speed
1968 Camaro SS/RS - Blue 327/4speed

C10 Build Thread: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=833278

The "Others"
1933 Ford Pickup (Camaro in disguise)
2017 Camaro SS

Life long Chevy guy
CAMAROBOY68SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2022, 09:11 PM   #6
pappy 2
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: ord, NE.
Posts: 98
Re: The Low Down

Thanks to all the replies. I am not sure why it bottoms out with just 4 in. lowering springs, unless there are different spring rates by different vendors. All of my lowering stuff is Performance on Line, both front and rear. Had a mess of issues with the front, another story. I am thinking real hard about going with coil over kits for both front and back. Looking at CCP coil over systems.
pappy 2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2022, 09:18 PM   #7
pappy 2
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: ord, NE.
Posts: 98
Re: The Low Down

To CAMMARO BOY

I am using stock length shocks with relocators, would the shocks be what is actually bottoming and not the axel on frame. Would think that I would see damage to the shocks. Got the relocators so could use standard length shocks as was stated in Vendor mag.
pappy 2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2022, 03:55 PM   #8
Sim6
Registered User
 
Sim6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Centerton, AR
Posts: 433
Re: The Low Down

PAPPY 2, easy way to tell would be it get it up high enough (Safely) where you could crawl underneath and watch while someone compressed the rear suspension. If it's truly the stock bump stops, they may need to be removed and fabricate/get short ones that offer more room and still provide a rubber stop. But if you don't care about the stance then raise it up.
Jeff
__________________
1969 Chevy C10 SWB 350/400 4"-6" drop on steelies

53' Chevy 3100 5 window http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=660793

http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=771679
Sim6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2022, 08:19 AM   #9
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,943
Re: The Low Down

Quote:
Originally Posted by pappy 2 View Post
To CAMMARO BOY

I am using stock length shocks with relocators, would the shocks be what is actually bottoming and not the axel on frame. Would think that I would see damage to the shocks. Got the relocators so could use standard length shocks as was stated in Vendor mag.
I would check this before spending $$ on more parts or changing other things.

It will eat up an afternoon of your time but the info learned will help make better decisions.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com