Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
09-13-2023, 11:36 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 320
|
Budnik wheel backspace
Wondering if anyone can shed some light on what they have run on their wheels backspacing, front and back. Ideally, I would like to have some sort of turn radius when aired out or a couple inches higher than completely aired out, if possible. I plan on having a bump step welding up to stop be a few inches from completely bottomed out. The back I’m just looking for the wheels to tuck as high as they can. Was looking at 20x8.5 and 20x10 budnik spyders. Tires, I was looking at 235/40/20 and 285/35/20. Thanks in advance
1986 c10 pickup Front: Factory control arms Vannatta front inner fenders Bags with plates and cups Rear: Stock bed floor, tubs and rear end width Ridetech bolt in 4link with the shockwaves |
09-18-2023, 06:02 PM | #2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,068
|
Re: Budnik wheel backspace
5-5.25" BS fronts
5" BS rears (stock axle width) First 2 pics are 20" Coys (8.5"F w/5.25"BS; 10"R w/5.5"BS). Third pic is AR TT2's (18x8"F w/5.25"BS; 20x10"R w/5.0BS).
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol. |
09-20-2023, 01:32 PM | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 320
|
Re: Budnik wheel backspace
Thank you for the reply. Exactly what I was looking for…couple questions. One of budniks install referrals is saying he remembers possibly 4.25 and to be safe 4.5bs, not sure if that’s the front or back, did not specify in our convo. The 20x10 looks like it’s exactly what I need. This truck on air ride or static?
Last edited by ShinyC10; 09-20-2023 at 01:41 PM. |
09-20-2023, 04:45 PM | #4 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,068
|
Re: Budnik wheel backspace
Quote:
If you're planning air ride & using OE length arms up front, you'll want more BS to tuck the wheels in from the fender lips. Narrowed a-arms & less BS works toward that goal as well.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol. |
|
09-20-2023, 11:05 PM | #5 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 320
|
Re: Budnik wheel backspace
So a 4.25 or 4.5bs up front is a no go for sure. I think I have read on here somewhere that 5.25bs up front on a 8/8.5 wheel is what some guys prefer.
|
09-21-2023, 09:02 AM | #6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,068
|
Re: Budnik wheel backspace
Those numbers would work but you'll rub the fender lip sooner vs. w/more back-spacing. Not an issue w/a mild drop but can be w/aggressive drops.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol. |
09-21-2023, 12:12 PM | #7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 320
|
Re: Budnik wheel backspace
So it’s sounds like with my current situation, the 5.25bs up front and a 5”bs in the rear will be ideal? As long as the width is still 8.5, does it matter if the wheel is a 20 or 19? I feel like the 20 is ever so slightly bigger than what I want up front and the 18s look just a tad smaller. Tires, I was looking at 235/40 and 275/35.
|
09-21-2023, 12:56 PM | #8 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,068
|
Re: Budnik wheel backspace
Quote:
235/25.4 x 40% = 3.7" (27.4" OD) 273/25.4 x 35% = 3.78" (27.57" OD) I'd go 255/40 up front (28" OD) & 295/40 out back (29.2" OD). More sidewall for pothole cushion + better overall height for the larger truck size wheel opening.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol. |
|
09-22-2023, 02:59 PM | #9 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 320
|
Re: Budnik wheel backspace
Quote:
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|