|
04-22-2024, 01:49 AM
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2023
Location: near salem, oregon
Posts: 53
|
1972 c10 lowered
finally lowered my c10 went with a 3/5 drop, looks great i think, dont need a shock relocation kit when your shocks are shot so thats nice. jk ill get shocks on er soon lol, tired of daily driving a bouncy house
|
|
|
|
04-22-2024, 07:48 AM
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Northern Calif.
Posts: 3,770
|
Re: 1972 c10 lowered
Looking good.
|
|
|
|
|
04-22-2024, 10:14 AM
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Edmonton Alberta
Posts: 1,457
|
Re: 1972 c10 lowered
I think it looks great, I was curious to see it because not too many people do a 3/5 drop with springs alone.
Very advantageous to someone who has a truck with no spindles - like me - on my 68. Please keep posting your progress with the truck!
__________________
DAVE Edmonton, Alberta 1959 Apache 1967 K20 1968 C20 1970 C10 1972 GMC 2500 1981 C10 Last edited by dagnabbitt; 04-22-2024 at 10:22 AM. |
|
|
|
|
04-22-2024, 06:44 PM
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2023
Location: near salem, oregon
Posts: 53
|
Re: 1972 c10 lowered
oh yeah, im grateful to have a factory five lug and front disc brake truck. 3 inch drop springs in the front with no drop spindle is kind of pushing it through, whenever i jack the front end up it almost takes the springs out of its pickets. makes for some very concerning sounds going back down
|
|
|
|
|
04-22-2024, 10:15 PM
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: 3,018 feet above the SoCal/Mojave Desert region.
Posts: 372
|
Re: 1972 c10 lowered
Rear coils or leafs. I have a '72 long bed as well but with rear leafs. I wanna do a 3/5 drop as well. Looks good.
|
|
|
|
|
04-23-2024, 01:51 AM
|
#6 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2023
Location: near salem, oregon
Posts: 53
|
Re: 1972 c10 lowered
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
04-23-2024, 10:11 AM
|
#7 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Edmonton Alberta
Posts: 1,457
|
Re: 1972 c10 lowered
Quote:
__________________
DAVE Edmonton, Alberta 1959 Apache 1967 K20 1968 C20 1970 C10 1972 GMC 2500 1981 C10 |
|
|
|
|
|
04-23-2024, 01:00 PM
|
#8 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2023
Location: near salem, oregon
Posts: 53
|
Re: 1972 c10 lowered
Quote:
 rides about as good as it can get cutin bump stops and no shocks, theyre all gone, need some drop shocks soon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
04-23-2024, 01:02 PM
|
#9 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Dallas Texas
Posts: 3,218
|
Re: 1972 c10 lowered
.
Looking good! From what I understand, standard shocks should work fine in the front. Rear, I'm not so sure. -klb
__________________
67 C10 fleet fuel injected '70 402, 700r4, 3.73 posi 07 335 sport turbo 6sp 94 Trans Am GT LT1 6sp posi -- sold after 22yrs 99 540 sport V8 6sp -- sold 73 240z L24 4sp -- given to friend 68 C10 step 350/350 3.73 open -- sold |
|
|
|
|
04-24-2024, 03:16 PM
|
#10 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: konawa ok/oakdale Ca.
Posts: 1,652
|
Re: 1972 c10 lowered
Looks good.
|
|
|
|
|
04-24-2024, 09:44 PM
|
#11 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: central oregon
Posts: 269
|
Re: 1972 c10 lowered
3/5 springs on mine never rubbed on any speed bumps. Still not low enough for me so i put 2” blocks in the rear and waiting on disc with drop 2.5” drop spindles for the front. Truck rides amazingly well on the springs and relocated shocks
|
|
|
|
|
04-25-2024, 09:10 AM
|
#12 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2023
Location: near salem, oregon
Posts: 53
|
Re: 1972 c10 lowered
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Linear Mode
