![]() |
Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Freeville Ny
Posts: 39
|
Better heads worth it?
I have a reman 350 in my truck. It has 71 350 76cc heads on it. I have no idea what the cam is but I assume it’s a stock cam. Is it worth swapping to a set of aluminum 64cc heads? I know a cam swap would be ideal but I am afraid to do a flat tappet these days and I think if I’m going to put the money into a retrofit roller I might as well just get a crate engine. I also have an edelbrock eps intake and summit headers. Any thoughts or opinions?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Orem, Utah
Posts: 7,915
|
Re: Better heads worth it?
"Worth it" is a very individual value judgement. You will definitely notice a difference in the seat of your pants.
__________________
I have sworn upon the altar of God, eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man. - Thomas Jefferson |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: TN.
Posts: 8,129
|
Re: Better heads worth it?
I would go for it.
![]()
__________________
________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________ 84 Chevy K-20 63 Impala (my high school car) http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...Crew Cab Build |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Binghamton, NY
Posts: 3,459
|
Re: Better heads worth it?
Cam, heads and compression makes power. So putting on good heads will get you more power. But the motor is almost torn down enough to replace the cam, why not do both? Use break in oil for the cam.
__________________
2000 GMC CCSB 454/4L80 6” lift SAS 1999 Chevy CCSB 454/NV4500 6” lift 1999 GMC Yukon 350/4L60 4" SAS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Binghamton, NY
Posts: 3,459
|
Re: Better heads worth it?
double tap
__________________
2000 GMC CCSB 454/4L80 6” lift SAS 1999 Chevy CCSB 454/NV4500 6” lift 1999 GMC Yukon 350/4L60 4" SAS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Oklahoma City, OK
Posts: 2,552
|
Re: Better heads worth it?
Do the 64cc heads have accessory mounting holes in all the right places? Assuming yes, other then the labor, the need to buy parts count for a head swap is pretty low. A top end gasket set and maybe a head bolt set(depends on your thoughts on reusing head bolts).
What is the planned use for the truck? Possible the higher compression might need more expensive gas. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Chehalis, WA
Posts: 19
|
Re: Better heads worth it?
What does "worth it" mean to you?
A heads and cam swap will add power for sure *if done right*. How much power is all about how much you want to spend. Aluminum is pretty, but adds cost to no real benefit unless you're trying to make big power. So a better question might be "for this amount of money, what's the best way to make more power?" Retrofit rollers are great, but they are a fair bit of work given that you have to positively retain the cam. Flat-tappet cams are fine with good break-in technique and the right oil, which is easy to get these days (Lucas Hot Rod Oil, Royal Purple HPS or XPR, Valvoline VR1, and others...). A roller will make better power, but profiles like the CompCams Xtreme Energy are "near roller" profiles that get you most of the benefit for much less cost and work. You can do a flat tappet cam swap with the engine in the chassis, but you'll have to pull it for a retrofit roller. Lots of things to think about. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Salmon Arm BC
Posts: 174
|
Re: Better heads worth it?
I don't think it is worth doing the heads without also making a cam upgrade. I hear you on the issues with flat tappet lifters these days though. Seems the metallurgy has been forgotten as there is an epidemic of failures in break-in or with low miles even with guys using proper oil and break in technique.
__________________
1970 C10 l/b 292/4spd Build: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=811062 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Omaha, Nebraska
Posts: 437
|
Re: Better heads worth it?
Personally, I would identify a roller short block crate engine you eventually want to upgrade to, determine what heads you would run on that engine, get those and toss them on the current engine until it is time to replace it. Then you have the heads you want for the motor you want versus buying heads now only to buy a complete roller long block. I am a big fan of piecemealing out big purchases whenever possible! LOL
__________________
Travis' Tribute Truck - 65 C10 Frame Up Restoration http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=495073 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Freeville Ny
Posts: 39
|
Re: Better heads worth it?
My truck is just a summer cruiser. I would love to be to be in the 350hp range but I know that’s not going to happen without a cam. I would love to do a cam swap as well but there are a lot flat tapper horror stories these days. Has anybody hear of any companies that are making reliable parts or is it all a big gamble with flat tappets?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Hickory Flat, GA
Posts: 4,473
|
Re: Better heads worth it?
Quote:
__________________
Christian Carpenter 1963 C10 - Frankentruck 283, Muncie 3 speed with overdrive Overdrive wiring here1963-ish truck bed trailer - Half-Wit 1981 C10 - Penny 305, th350 --> Soon to be 350, Saginaw 4 speed 1995 Dodge Dakota Sport "I'll put it simple: if you're going hard enough left, you'll find yourself turning right." - Doc Hudson |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Binghamton, NY
Posts: 3,459
|
Re: Better heads worth it?
Get a Vortec 350. Roller cam, decent heads, decent compression factory. Rated at 255 which isn't horrible, but with a bump in compression and cam, 350 be easy. Sucks wouldn't be able to use the parts you have, but could sell em n recoup some cash.....
__________________
2000 GMC CCSB 454/4L80 6” lift SAS 1999 Chevy CCSB 454/NV4500 6” lift 1999 GMC Yukon 350/4L60 4" SAS |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: phx az
Posts: 326
|
Re: Better heads worth it?
for the price of a crate sbc, a junkyard 5.3 with a cam will make more power, better MPGs..
Is heads worth it? the LS should tell you yes. its basically what, a 327ci motor with great heads and makes tons of power for cheap.
__________________
tubbed 1984 gmc jmmy http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=639738 Alice Hombre http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=808454 1963 Scout Retro-mod https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/...d.php?t=854167 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Chehalis, WA
Posts: 19
|
Re: Better heads worth it?
The biggest causes of initial flat tappet cam failures are failure to lube the cam, incorrect valvetrain adjustment, extended cranking with no start, and as always - wrong oil/no break-in oil.
The couple that I've helped people with all had the rocker arms brutally tight because they were told to adjust the preload running...which has always been wrong. It takes 3 minutes to break in a flat-tappet cam...and the risks are extremely low if you've done it all right. If the engine is healthy, a head/cam swap - done right - is the cheapest route to power by far. Don't miss all the additional costs of doing an LS swap including mounts, exhaust, fuel pump, controller, etc. The LS is a damn near perfect engine and the swap is straightforward...but price it out so you don't get surprised. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|