The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old Yesterday, 09:17 AM   #1
custom10nut
Registered User
 
custom10nut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: East Tn (In the heart of the Smoky Mtns)
Posts: 1,875
Rear gear Ratio Opinions/Suggestions

Just throwing this out there for the masses.
My C-10 (350/TH350) currently has the factory 3.73 rear gear.
My goal is to get better drivability on the Highway (65-75mph).
I know mpg is a pipe dream.
Currently it’ll run around 32-3300 rpm around 70mph.
It’s ok for shorter trips, but currently, longer trips are kinda out of the question.
What I’d like ist to get the rpm down around 25-2800 range.
I don’t tow anything, and other than occasionally running to the Lumber yard, it’s really in semi-retirement (like me)
I’m not ready to “upgrade” to a 700r or 4l60,
Would a ratio in the 3.23- 3.35 range help any?
I just wanted to ask
custom10nut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 09:41 AM   #2
LockDoc
The Older Generation


 
LockDoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Montezuma, Iowa
Posts: 25,538
Re: Rear gear Ratio Opinions/Suggestions

-
My '68 was a little different, but not really. It had a 327/TH400 but it had a 4.11 rear gear. I put a Dana 3.54 in it and it made all the difference in the world, as far as driveability. The 3.54's are kind of hard to find but they are out there. You didn't mention if your truck has coils or leaf springs.
__________________
Leon

Locksmith, Specializing In Antique Trucks, Automobiles, & Motorcycles

(My Dually Pickup Project Thread)

http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=829820

-
LockDoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 09:50 AM   #3
pjmoreland
Senior Member

 
pjmoreland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 5,578
Re: Rear gear Ratio Opinions/Suggestions

I had a '67 C10 that was ordered originally with 4:10 gears. I put a 350/350 combo in it, and it was miserable on the highway. I swapped in 3.08 gears, which made it great for highway cruising. I drove that truck between California, Colorado and Oregon many times over the years I owned it. A set of 3.08 gears would drop you from 3300 down to 2700. The down side, of course, is that you will end up with a very sluggish first gear.
pjmoreland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 10:32 AM   #4
geezer#99
Registered User
 
geezer#99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Bowser
Posts: 13,651
Re: Rear gear Ratio Opinions/Suggestions

Just drive slower.
60 mph is about 2700 rpm.
geezer#99 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 11:00 AM   #5
dmjlambert
Senior Member
 
dmjlambert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 3,751
Re: Rear gear Ratio Opinions/Suggestions

The economy gear is 3.08 and that's what came stock on my 69 with a 350 and TH400 transmission. 3.08 sounds ideal for your situation IMO.
dmjlambert is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Yesterday, 03:05 PM   #6
Already Gone
70+ ( Old Skool Club )
 
Already Gone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan ,Canada
Posts: 9,125
Re: Rear gear Ratio Opinions/Suggestions

I'd wait till u were ready to upgrade to the 700R4 and do that. Did that with mine and with the 350 V8 and 3:73's and 29 inch tires i'm at 21/2200 at 70 MPH.
__________________
1972 C10 Custom/Deluxe 613 Highlander 406/700R4
1999 White Tahoe LS 4x2 with Z56 Police Package
1992 K1500 GMC Suburban

Members I have personally met: MusicMan70 - HeavyD - ChewyChevy67 - StingRay -71SWB4x4 - 67 Burb - DeadheadNM - too much stuff - bc65 - das601

" Circumsatances Do Not Change Responsibility "

" The Sky is not the Limit, Your Mind is." Marilyn Monroe ..


RIP Charlie Watts 1941 - 2021
Already Gone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 09:57 AM   #7
custom10nut
Registered User
 
custom10nut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: East Tn (In the heart of the Smoky Mtns)
Posts: 1,875
Re: Rear gear Ratio Opinions/Suggestions

Thank you to all for your input.
Now to comment:
My C-10 is LWB with the Trailing Arm/Coil Spring rear suspension.
Speed wise: I generally do just tootle around the area, running errands, to the Hardware/Lumber Store, but occasionally I go out on the Interstate to go pickup things for the Boss-Lady.
Driving 60 on the interstate here (I-40/I-81 East Tennessee) is sometimes more dangerous than exceeding the limit.
I know that the 3.08 gear will have an impact on first gear (I had a 69 Impala with them. It wasn’t much off the line, but it would cruise at 80mph without issue).

All that being said, I’m leaning towards something in the 3.30 - 3.35 range.
This will kinda give me what I’m wanting without hurting 1st gear.
custom10nut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 10:01 AM   #8
Luke87gt
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2024
Location: Pleasanton CA
Posts: 217
Re: Rear gear Ratio Opinions/Suggestions

Transmission with OD out of the question?

Best of both worlds
__________________
1969 C10 Shortbed
Luke87gt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 10:04 AM   #9
pjmoreland
Senior Member

 
pjmoreland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 5,578
Re: Rear gear Ratio Opinions/Suggestions

A set of 3.31 gears will drop you from 3300 to a little over 2900.

A 700R4 with your current gears would drop you to 2300.
pjmoreland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 10:27 AM   #10
jocko
Senior Member
 
jocko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Godley, TX
Posts: 17,964
Re: Rear gear Ratio Opinions/Suggestions

if you're od trans averse and don't want to crack open the rear end, a gear verndors overdrive is another option. It's not the cheapest, but unless you're doing the rear end work yourself, it's not "that" much more than paying a reputable driveline shop to install your rear gears. With no other changes, a GV unit would make 3200 rpm drop to 2500 rpm (i.e. almost twice the reduction of going to a 3.31). A GV unit can be used as an overdrive only, or can be used to split gears, essentially giving you a 6-speed automatic, but there's almost zero point in the latter for the type of use you describe. Anyway, just another option so you have them all on the table.

Btw, what's your tire diameter?

I feel your pain - my C20 has a 4.56.. I haven't decided which way to go yet, and I may do nothing. I like geezer's approach too - but true statement above that driving too slow can be as dangerous as speeding on today's crazy highways. Some states have 80 mph speed limits in some areas - and I like to keep up with the flow, but that wouldn't happen in my C20.

The other thing to keep in mind is that while 3200 rpm may "seem" loud, annoying, or worse yet, damaging to the engine - only the first two may be reality - and that's probably mostly because of how our perceptions of what "should be" have changed over the last few decades with od transmissions becoming standard on everything. This old era of trucks was never designed with od transmissions in mind and a 3.73 isn't that radical - you could opt to just do nothing - cruise, sit back, and enjoy the fine whine.
jocko is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 12:15 PM   #11
Accelo
Senior Member
 
Accelo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: washington
Posts: 2,258
Re: Rear gear Ratio Opinions/Suggestions

With an Overdrive transmission, you will drop the RPM by 33%. 3300-rpm to 2300-rpm nominally.
3.73 to 3.08 is a 17.5% decrease in RPM.
To get the equivalent RPM drop using only rear-end gearing, it would require 2.61 gears.

When comparing costs and benefits, it's easy to see how transmission change may be the better option for some.
  • Low gear is much lower than the THM 350 ratio for better power off the line.
  • The lower rpm, in overdrive, typically adds 30% to your highway mileage.
  • Has the additional benefit of a quieter cab.
  • In my experience, you can do nothing that quiets a cab more than dripping motor rpm.
  • The lower RPM also changes the amount of engine wear and the hydrocarbons released per mile of travel.
  • All OD transmissions also have lock-up converters that will reduce highway RPM by another 200-300 rpm at highway speeds over a none-lock-up 350.

The cost to change the transmission varies, as does the rear-end gear change.
Only you can know what's best for you.

Last edited by Accelo; Today at 12:21 PM.
Accelo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 01:53 PM   #12
MikeB
Senior Member
 
MikeB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: North Texas
Posts: 3,524
Re: Rear gear Ratio Opinions/Suggestions

Quote:
Originally Posted by dmjlambert View Post
The economy gear is 3.08 and that's what came stock on my 69 with a 350 and TH400 transmission. 3.08 sounds ideal for your situation IMO.
3.08 is what my 69 C10 has had for 55 years. And even then, I wish I had another gear at 70mph and above. And that's with 29" tall tires. Back in the day of "55 saves lives" it was perfect at 60mph.

Engine/trans is a mild 350/TH350.
__________________
Mike
1969 C10 LWB -- owned for 35 years. 350/TH350, 3.08 posi, 1st Gen Vintage Air, AAW wiring harness, 5-lug conversion, 1985 spindles and brakes.
1982 C10 SWB -- sold
1981 C10 Silverado LWB -- sold, but wish I still had it!
1969 C10 (not the current one) that I bought in the early 1980s. Paid $1200; sold for $1500 a few years later. Just a hint at the appreciation that was coming.
Retired as a factory automation products salesman.
Worked part-time over the years for an engine builder and a classic car repair shop.
Member here for 24 years! This is the very first car/truck Internet forum I joined. I still used a dial-up modem back then!
MikeB is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 01:59 PM   #13
KQQL IT
At the body shop.
 
KQQL IT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Land of fruits and nuts.
Posts: 5,226
Re: Rear gear Ratio Opinions/Suggestions

Od or 3.08 - 3.36

I just did a 4l80 in my 73 and love it.
But near 5k all in.
$2200 rebuild
$1100 convertor
$1200 controller
$400 driveshaft
Atf x 3 gallons
__________________
" That didnt make it any newer "
" Dont antique the equipment "

Last edited by KQQL IT; Today at 02:08 PM.
KQQL IT is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Today, 01:59 PM   #14
MikeB
Senior Member
 
MikeB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: North Texas
Posts: 3,524
Re: Rear gear Ratio Opinions/Suggestions

Quote:
Originally Posted by jocko View Post
This old era of trucks was never designed with od transmissions in mind and a 3.73 isn't that radical - you could opt to just do nothing - cruise, sit back, and enjoy the fine whine.
Or think about adding some sound deadening material to the floor, doors, and behind the gas tank, and maybe even under the hood. In my case, I'm less concerned about the revs than the cab noise. And that's with new door seals and no open holes in the firewall.
__________________
Mike
1969 C10 LWB -- owned for 35 years. 350/TH350, 3.08 posi, 1st Gen Vintage Air, AAW wiring harness, 5-lug conversion, 1985 spindles and brakes.
1982 C10 SWB -- sold
1981 C10 Silverado LWB -- sold, but wish I still had it!
1969 C10 (not the current one) that I bought in the early 1980s. Paid $1200; sold for $1500 a few years later. Just a hint at the appreciation that was coming.
Retired as a factory automation products salesman.
Worked part-time over the years for an engine builder and a classic car repair shop.
Member here for 24 years! This is the very first car/truck Internet forum I joined. I still used a dial-up modem back then!
MikeB is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com