Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Yesterday, 10:52 AM | #1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: AZ
Posts: 69
|
New seat foam question… again.
Seat foam question… again. I know this has come up time after time but this is ridiculous.
On my last 1972 K10 build, 5+ years ago I replaced the seat foam and like everyone else who has done this I ended up sitting 1” from the top of the cab. If I recall, I bought that foam from CJ Pony. To remedy the height I bought a set of FCF lowering brackets. Problem solved, sort of. The seat height was better but I shouldn’t have had to replace the seat brackets to get there. Anyhow I sold that truck. After selling that I got the bug again and bought another 1972 K10. This one needed a seat cover so I bought a cover from LMC. After removing the old cover I saw the foam and damn, 50 year old foam smells, turns to dust, etc. so I ordered new foam, this time from Jegs. And once again I’m sitting an inch from the top. I’m only 5’11”. Just to be 100% clear both trucks had the correct 1972 year seat brackets and seat height wasn’t an issue until I swapped the foam. What the heck gives? Does anyone make a proper fitting foam? I’ve heard CCP does but I’m not convinced so I’m probably going to buy another set of FCF lowering brackets. I shouldn’t have to modify one thing to fix something so simple. Is anyone else having this issue? If you’re modifying the new foam and if so, how? Someone has to make the right foam height for a 72 WITH 72 seat brackets? |
Yesterday, 11:29 AM | #2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Catskill Mountains,NY
Posts: 8,727
|
Re: New seat foam question… again.
You can’t judge the seat height going by the old 50+ year old foam as you said it turns to dust . New foam will always be firmer and the height will be more . I used PUI foam had the same issue but in theory if the seat skin fits the foam is correct size wise . The firmness may be more than original no way to really know . The 67-72 trucks are rather cramped for taller people to be honest I’m more comfortable driving my 85 k20
Just an observation but when I was younger in the 70s most of the older people I knew (middle-aged) were not all that tall had very few as tall as myself . Maybe because these people grew up during the depression and their nutrition wasn’t all that good .
__________________
Mark 72 c20 custom camper Husky edition, 66 SS396 Chevelle 1964 Hawk, 63 Avanti,62 lark 1969 AMX , 1968 c20 stepside ,85 K20 1977 Suburban sold 68 anniversary. |
Yesterday, 11:41 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Winona Lake, IN
Posts: 6,422
|
Re: New seat foam question… again.
Weren’t there two types of seats that had different thickness foam?
__________________
70 C/10 SWB 402/TH400/3.73 "The Needy Beast" 200,000 Mile Club Disc Brake Club Owner installed options: Front Sway Bar Power Steering Power Brakes Cigar Lighter Courtesy Lights Deluxe Side Markers Wiper Delay Sliding Rear Window Power Windows Power Locks Sniper EFI 2015 Silverado 1500 LS 4.3/6L80/3.23 lowered 2" front & rear |
Yesterday, 01:01 PM | #4 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: AZ
Posts: 69
|
Re: New seat foam question… again.
Quote:
I was just trying to find out what other people have done to remedy this because I can’t be the only one having this issue. |
|
Yesterday, 01:03 PM | #5 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: AZ
Posts: 69
|
Re: New seat foam question… again.
|
Yesterday, 02:55 PM | #6 |
The Niner
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Broad Brook, CT
Posts: 2,500
|
Re: New seat foam question… again.
Thanks for this thread, Michael.
I've had 2 of these trucks since 2010. I didn't realize that FCF lowering brackets even existed. As much as I love this generation truck, I like the seating position of the square bodies better. Hopefully these brackets will replicate that. I just ordered a set today.
__________________
"A good racer is one whose head is in communication with his balls." - Richie Evans 1970 C/20 - 402/TH400/3.54s - 74K miles 2003 GMC Sierra 2500 - Wheatland Yellow Niner Progression Thread: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=697183 Classic Trucks article: https://www.motortrend.com/features/...et-c20-driven/ |
Yesterday, 05:05 PM | #7 |
Post Whore
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 11,379
|
Re: New seat foam question… again.
I'm sure the problem lies in the stiffness of the foam as 72c20customcamper stated. Foam comes in many varieties and no one knows what stiffness GM used back in the day. (Except maybe the Grumpster, bless his sole, may he rest in peace)
If I was you I would remove the bottom inch of foam and replace it with a softer foam so the foam collapses down more when your seated but still looks right when no one is sitting on the seat. If 1 inch isn't enough then replace 2 inches off the original foam height with softer foam. Heck we're luck to get aftermarket parts that are close to the right size let alone being made of the correct factory material.
__________________
Thanks to Bob and Jeanie and everyone else at Superior Performance for all their great help. RIP Bob Parks. 1967 Burban (the WMB),1988 S10 Blazer (the Stink10 II),1969 GTO (the Goat), 1970 Javelin, 1952 F2 Ford OHC six 4X4, 29 Model A, 72 Firebird (the DBP Bird). 85 Alfa Romeo If it breaks I didn't want it in the first place The WMB repair thread http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=698377 |
Today, 12:02 AM | #8 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: AZ
Posts: 69
|
Re: New seat foam question… again.
Quote:
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|