The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-11-2025, 04:37 PM   #1
adf5565
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2021
Location: Tioga Pennsylvania
Posts: 66
Head/header dilemma

I think I got myself into a sticky situation. Had the 350 for my 72 C20 with 4 speed rebuilt and put on aluminum AFR heads which have a square port. About 1.4” square. I had purchased hedman headers previously with the “added” clearance for the clutch cross shaft.

Engine is back in the truck and I’m installing the headers and just realized they are round port style. Supposed to be 1-5/8 primary’s but at the flange the best I measure is 1.5”, and in many cases is smaller due to flange interference. Thus I am going to get a somewhat restrictive mismatch between the head face and header.

How big of a deal is this? I’d purchase something else but it is difficult to find a header that fits all of my requirements (square port, clearance for the clutch, etc). Anyone have recommendations for different headers?

Picture shows the extent of restriction to a square port gasket which matches very closely to the head itself.
Attached Images
  

Last edited by adf5565; 10-11-2025 at 05:23 PM.
adf5565 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2025, 01:55 PM   #2
HO455
Registered User
 
HO455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 12,412
Re: Head/header dilemma

It's not the worst case scenario. Installed as is you may have leaks. If that isn't an issue you may have some slight reversion issues that may not be noticeable outside of plugs running a darker color.

One bandaid fix would be to get a thick header flange(3/8"-1/2") that matches the smaller round tubes and grind the the square side out to make an adapter to help the transition. Kind of like a square bore to spread bore carb adapter. It require longer bolts and it would move the headers out towards the frame and that may cause interference problems.

Or if you're handy with a welder you can remove the round flanges and replace them with square flanges.
__________________
Thanks to Bob and Jeanie and everyone else at Superior Performance for all their great help.
RIP Bob Parks.
1967 Burban (the WMB),1988 S10 Blazer (the Stink10 II),1969 GTO (the Goat), 1970 Javelin, 1952 F2 Ford OHC six 4X4, 29 Model A, 72 Firebird (the DBP Bird). 85 Alfa Romeo
If it breaks I didn't want it in the first place
The WMB repair thread http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=698377
HO455 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2025, 09:07 AM   #3
adf5565
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2021
Location: Tioga Pennsylvania
Posts: 66
Re: Head/header dilemma

Quote:
Originally Posted by HO455 View Post
It's not the worst case scenario. Installed as is you may have leaks. If that isn't an issue you may have some slight reversion issues that may not be noticeable outside of plugs running a darker color.

One bandaid fix would be to get a thick header flange(3/8"-1/2") that matches the smaller round tubes and grind the the square side out to make an adapter to help the transition. Kind of like a square bore to spread bore carb adapter. It require longer bolts and it would move the headers out towards the frame and that may cause interference problems.

Or if you're handy with a welder you can remove the round flanges and replace them with square flanges.
Thanks for the input. I've also realized the flange for those headers is very sloppy and blocking part of the tubes as is. I'm going to clean that up as best i can which will help and remove some of the restriction, and I believe the gasket should match the header so I'll get a round port gasket instead.

Being that most aftermarket heads have square exhaust ports I'm surprised there isn't more options available but i guess it must not cause too much of an issue
adf5565 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2025, 12:35 PM   #4
70STOVEBOLT
Senior Member
 
70STOVEBOLT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Winona Lake, IN
Posts: 7,066
Re: Head/header dilemma

I have never seen square tube headers, but if the primaries are 1 5/8 they should work fine as-is. It does look like the flange is oddly shaped in the pic, I hope the tube is not the same shape as the opening.
__________________
70 C/10 SWB 402/TH400/3.73 "The Needy Beast"
200,000 Mile Club
Disc Brake Club

Owner installed options:
Front Sway Bar
Power Steering
Power Brakes
Cigar Lighter
Courtesy Lights
Deluxe Side Markers
Wiper Delay
Sliding Rear Window
Power Windows
Power Locks
Sniper EFI

2015 Silverado 1500 LS 4.3/6L80/3.23 lowered 2" front & rear
70STOVEBOLT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2025, 12:48 PM   #5
adf5565
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2021
Location: Tioga Pennsylvania
Posts: 66
Re: Head/header dilemma

Quote:
Originally Posted by 70STOVEBOLT View Post
I have never seen square tube headers, but if the primaries are 1 5/8 they should work fine as-is. It does look like the flange is oddly shaped in the pic, I hope the tube is not the same shape as the opening.
Yep they are 1-5/8. For being hedman headers I’m not impressed at the quality, some of the flanges have 1/8” obstruction in the tube. Which I’ll try to clean up. Thankfully the tubes themselves are round at least.
Attached Images
 
adf5565 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2025, 01:16 PM   #6
70STOVEBOLT
Senior Member
 
70STOVEBOLT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Winona Lake, IN
Posts: 7,066
Re: Head/header dilemma

I have Hedders on my truck and they seemed pretty good, but I would like to see a thicker flange. I bought the unpainted version, looks like you did too.
__________________
70 C/10 SWB 402/TH400/3.73 "The Needy Beast"
200,000 Mile Club
Disc Brake Club

Owner installed options:
Front Sway Bar
Power Steering
Power Brakes
Cigar Lighter
Courtesy Lights
Deluxe Side Markers
Wiper Delay
Sliding Rear Window
Power Windows
Power Locks
Sniper EFI

2015 Silverado 1500 LS 4.3/6L80/3.23 lowered 2" front & rear
70STOVEBOLT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2025, 04:40 PM   #7
MikeB
Senior Member
 
MikeB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: North Texas
Posts: 4,038
Re: Head/header dilemma

Yeah, square up those round openings as much as possible. Otherwise, there will be exhaust gas blockage and turbulence.

My Hedman 62010 stainless headers used the gaskets below which matched the header ports. And the width was near perfect for the 1.35" square ports on my heads. So the header tubes were >100% open to exhaust ports.

__________________
Mike
1969 Custom/10 LWB -- owned for 37 years. 350/TH350, 3.08 posi, recent AAW wiring harness, 5-lug conversion, 1985 spindles and brakes. Hedman stainless headers. Old Air installation in progress.
1982 Custom Deluxe 10 SWB -- converted from 250-six to roller cam 350 w/ Vortec heads -- sold
1981 C10 Silverado LWB, 305, TH350C -- sold, but wish I still had it!
1969 C10 (not the current one) which I bought in the early 1980s. Paid $1200; sold for $1500 a few years later. Just a hint at the appreciation that was coming.
Retired as a factory automation products salesman.
Worked part-time over the years for an engine builder and a classic car repair shop.
Member here for 26 years! This is the very first car/truck Internet forum I joined. I still used a dial-up modem back then!

Last edited by MikeB; 10-13-2025 at 04:49 PM.
MikeB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2025, 04:44 PM   #8
adf5565
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2021
Location: Tioga Pennsylvania
Posts: 66
Re: Head/header dilemma

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeB View Post
Yeah, square up those round openings as much as possible. Otherwise, there will be exhaust gas blockage and turbulence.

My Hedmans used the gaskets below which matched the header ports. And the width was near perfect for the 1.35" square ports on my heads. So the header tubes were >100% open to exhaust ports.

What model header did you use? I saw they sell some with the oval ported flanges which would match the heads a lot better. I Just wasn’t clear how much the clutch shaft would interfere.
adf5565 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2025 67-72chevytrucks.com