Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-09-2004, 11:17 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Saint Louis
Posts: 76
|
Neverending carb questions/dilemma
I am not trying to run this in the dirt. However I need some possibly unbiased (yeah right) opinions for my situations. 350 ci chevrolet in an 83' GMC. My engine will be putting out 285-295 h.p. yet with a somewhat steep 405-410 tq. at 2000 rpm's with a hydraulic roller. My goal is to get as good of a running street engine without losing economy or even possibly gaining some. Is it possible to get a holley 600cfm vac sec. to get as good as gas mileage as a Quadrajet??? I know almost nothing about a q-jet. From racing experience i know alot more about the holleys. Would the edelbrock carbs offer the smaller primaries of the q-jet??? On this engine i would give up 6-8 h.p.@6000 rpm's for 2-3 mpg's, however, i am really comfy with the holley design. Thanks to all who reply.
|
10-09-2004, 11:44 PM | #2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 30
|
Not sure if they still make it, but ive seen holly spread bore carbs instead of the sqaure bore like the 600 if you fust prefer holly.
|
10-10-2004, 12:04 AM | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Lubbock, Texas
Posts: 2,121
|
a Q-jet will get better gas milllage than a holley, always.
__________________
'96 Nissan Pathfinder '02 Firebird Trans Am. '88 K5 Blazer |
10-10-2004, 11:43 AM | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Saint Louis
Posts: 76
|
even better than a holley spreadbore??? If so ,,, why?
|
10-10-2004, 03:01 PM | #5 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Lubbock, Texas
Posts: 2,121
|
the holley's are made for racing aplications WOT, and the Q-jets were made for driving around, but the holley will help you out more on racing than the Q-jet will
__________________
'96 Nissan Pathfinder '02 Firebird Trans Am. '88 K5 Blazer |
10-10-2004, 03:19 PM | #6 |
california fill
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sunny So-Cal
Posts: 694
|
everything has a learning curve. If you know holleys, you are inherently capable of knowing about q-jets too. you have to learn though. I say buy a couple junk q-jets and tear into them and rebuild one and see if you can get it running. they're great carbs. Dont listen to the people that call them quadrajunk, they're ignorant.
quadrajets were original equipment on zillions of different vehicles for many years. they're all about driveability and economy. Dont let those words fool you though- they also perform GREAT. The combination of throttle response, economy, tuneability, availability of parts, etc etc makes these carbs my #1 pick for ANYTHING that you plan on driving more than just on the weekend. They really are awesome. The old school holley and AFB style carbs are good too. Theyre tried and true but for the particular application of a TRUCK, the quadrajet is the way to go. If you wanna take the easy way out, throw a holley on there. yeah it'll work and if its setup right, it'll work great. Dont underestimate the quadrajet though. good luck pc |
10-10-2004, 10:29 PM | #7 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Shreveport LA
Posts: 3,170
|
The Q-jet not only has small front venturis, but each venturi has an extra booster in it, two boosters per side, one inside the other.
|
10-11-2004, 06:56 PM | #8 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Saint Louis
Posts: 76
|
Where is the best place to get a good quadrajet. I really don't want a junkyard carb. Are the edelbrocks reman or are they new??? Good quality??? Or how about j.e.t. performance,,, How is their quality??? I haven't even purchased this 83' gmc w/ 305 yet. However i am pretty sure it has a q-jet on it already. However i am wanting to rid it of alot of emissions components and miles of vacuum lines from the carbs of that era. I may even get a spreadbore adapter and put on a new alum. intake. That will work with the 350 that will go in later.
|
Bookmarks |
|
|