The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-31-2014, 08:46 PM   #26
67_C-30
I have a radical idea!
 
67_C-30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sweet Home Alabama!
Posts: 6,513
Re: CPP Drop Spindles: Conflicting Information

Quote:
Originally Posted by lolife99 View Post
Nope.
No one has ever put this info out with pictures of the direct comparison,... and actual numerical differences..
Let me ask this then, is there a certain drop spindle out there that is known to surely widen the wheel track over the stock drum brake wheel track?

I am going to be running narrow front tires, and I want to widen the wheel track to move the wheels further out, and that is the reason I'm asking...
__________________
'67 C-30 Dually Pickup 6.2 Turbo Diesel, NP435
‘72 C-10 SWB , 350 4bbl, TH350
'69 C-10 SWB , 250 L6, 3 OTT
'69 GMC C3500, dump truck, 351 V6, NP435
'84 M1009 CUCV Military Blazer

67 C-30 Turbodiesel build thread
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=254096

My trucks
http://s226.photobucket.com/albums/d...ediafilter=all

Member of the 1-Ton Club!
67_C-30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2014, 09:29 PM   #27
big d's red67
Registered User
 
big d's red67's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Broken Arrow Okla.
Posts: 510
Re: CPP Drop Spindles: Conflicting Information

Quote:
Originally Posted by lolife99 View Post
That's weird,... because even CPP doesn't claim that they move the wheels in that far.
That's what I'm trying to get figured out.
Somewhere I read that CPP made the statement it would move them in an 1 1/8 from regular drop spindles, for the life of me I can't find it now.
__________________
1967 swb 454 cid 700R4 trans SOLD

2006 Chevy Trailblazer SS
2013 Camaro RS convertible the wife's

Build thread http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=573248
big d's red67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2014, 09:50 PM   #28
lolife99
67-72 parts collector,…
 
lolife99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Mid-MO
Posts: 22,702
Re: CPP Drop Spindles: Conflicting Information

Quote:
Originally Posted by big d's red67 View Post
Somewhere I read that CPP made the statement it would move them in an 1 1/8 from regular drop spindles, for the life of me I can't find it now.
You probably got it here:
http://www.classicperform.com/Hot_News/HotNews.htm

QUOTE:
Looking for a spindle and brake kit for your lowered truck with big tires and wheels? CPP's introduces their new modular 2" drop spindle and drop spindle wheel kits for 1960-87 Chevy pickups. This exclusive new “Simple Offset Solution” or SOS™ design helps solve tire to fender interference commonly found with lowered trucks. This new SOS™ technology was designed to address concerns about using aftermarket big wheels and tires by using different spindle/rotor offsets. Classic Performance’s new modular spindle and bracket works with factory 1971-87 C10 brake components, or for a HIGH performance option, combine CPP’s spindle with their new Big Brake 13" Rotor, Twin 52mm Piston Brake Caliper kit.
Classic Performance’s new Modular Spindle offers many benefits available for the first time, installs easy without modifications, works with factory ball joints and tie rod ends, lowers your truck a full 2", offers adjustable steering stops, provides 1-1/8" more fender to tire clearance, allows use with standard factory brakes and performance aftermarket "BIG" Brake Kits


Is that total?
Per side?
Compared to what?
(back to my original question,...)

I've seen all this before,...
CPP needs to prove it.
__________________
Keith

Convert to disc brakes.
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=444823
lolife99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2014, 09:52 PM   #29
big d's red67
Registered User
 
big d's red67's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Broken Arrow Okla.
Posts: 510
Re: CPP Drop Spindles: Conflicting Information

Quote:
Originally Posted by lolife99 View Post
You probably got it here:
http://www.classicperform.com/Hot_News/HotNews.htm

QUOTE:
Looking for a spindle and brake kit for your lowered truck with big tires and wheels? CPP's introduces their new modular 2" drop spindle and drop spindle wheel kits for 1960-87 Chevy pickups. This exclusive new “Simple Offset Solution” or SOS™ design helps solve tire to fender interference commonly found with lowered trucks. This new SOS™ technology was designed to address concerns about using aftermarket big wheels and tires by using different spindle/rotor offsets. Classic Performance’s new modular spindle and bracket works with factory 1971-87 C10 brake components, or for a HIGH performance option, combine CPP’s spindle with their new Big Brake 13" Rotor, Twin 52mm Piston Brake Caliper kit.
Classic Performance’s new Modular Spindle offers many benefits available for the first time, installs easy without modifications, works with factory ball joints and tie rod ends, lowers your truck a full 2", offers adjustable steering stops, provides 1-1/8" more fender to tire clearance, allows use with standard factory brakes and performance aftermarket "BIG" Brake Kits


Is that total?
Per side?
Compared to what?
(back to my original question,...)

I've seen all this before,...
CPP needs to prove it.
That's the one. In my case it was each side.
__________________
1967 swb 454 cid 700R4 trans SOLD

2006 Chevy Trailblazer SS
2013 Camaro RS convertible the wife's

Build thread http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=573248
big d's red67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2014, 10:22 PM   #30
67ctener
Registered User
 
67ctener's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Arlington Washington
Posts: 1,808
Re: CPP Drop Spindles: Conflicting Information

All I can say is I'm running 2.5" modular spindles combined with bags on my truck with a 20x8 and 4.25 backspace. That seems to be hanging that front wheel out there and I don't know if it'd be possible with standard spindles.
67ctener is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2014, 06:46 PM   #31
mtnbikerxt
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Cheshire, CT
Posts: 39
Re: CPP Drop Spindles: Conflicting Information

Quote:
Originally Posted by lolife99 View Post
Here's my issue:

1) Drum brake fronts have the narrowest oem track width.
2) stock oem 71-87 disc brake spindles are suppose to be 3/4" wider than oem drum brake spindles.
3) old school drop spindles are suppose to be 1/2"-3/4" wider than stock disc brake spindles.
(for tie rod and lower a-arm clearance, due to raising the spindle centerline)

Where do the CPP modular spindles track width fall in?

Ok,... suppose they are 5/8" narrower (per side) than stock disc brake spindles.
That makes them 1/4" WIDER (per side) than drum brake spindles.
Correct?

But yet CPP still just claims they move the wheels in.
If I had all the different spindles,... I would make a jig to put this issue to rest.
Seems like CPP could do this,... but they don't.

I believe I read somewhere that CPP uses the same casting for all of their drop spindles and simply drills for the different balljoint and tierod tapers. If this is the case, CPPs wheel offset chart suggests that there is a 0.5" difference in width between the stock '67-'70 drum and the '71-'87 disc spindles.

They say that their CP4SX spindles are 1/16" wider than drums, 7/16" narrower than stock discs.

They also say their CP30106 (modular) spindles are 1/4" narrower than drums, 3/4" narrower than stock discs.

Both suggest a 0.5" difference in width between the stock drum and stock disc spindles.

Quote:
Originally Posted by big d's red67 View Post
This my truck Tommy is refering to, my track width from the out side of the tire to outside of the tire was 77 inches, after the install of the CPP modular spindles it was 74 9/16th inches from outside to outside of the tires.
Quote:
Originally Posted by big d's red67 View Post
That measurement was going from a 2 1/2inch aftermarket drop spindle to the CPP modular. Also want to add the CPP modular is listed as a 2inch drop it more like 2 1/4 inch.
Quote:
Originally Posted by lolife99 View Post
That figures up to 1.22" per side narrower.
If the old-school drop spindles moved the wheels out 1/2" per side relative to a stock disc spindle, moving from those to a modular spindle would move the wheels in 1-1/4" each side. Pretty much exactly what BigD experienced.

Last edited by mtnbikerxt; 04-01-2014 at 06:56 PM.
mtnbikerxt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2014, 07:04 PM   #32
lolife99
67-72 parts collector,…
 
lolife99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Mid-MO
Posts: 22,702
Re: CPP Drop Spindles: Conflicting Information

Quote:
Originally Posted by mtnbikerxt View Post
I believe I read somewhere that CPP uses the same casting for all of their drop spindles and simply drills for the different balljoint and tierod tapers.
Not just CPP,... but all the spindle companies do this.^^^
Belltech, McGaughy's, Western Chassis, etc.
It only makes economical sense to have one casting with different balljoint and outer tie rod taper sizes,... because this is the only difference in the 60-87 spindles.

They are available in 4 difference sizes using the same casting.
60-62
63-70
71-72
73-87

They all utilize the HD 1.25" wide rotors, calipers and bearings that came on the 71-87 trucks.

The CPP Modular spindles also use these same parts when using the 12" kit.
The 13" big Brake Modular set up uses the same bearings, on a fabricated hub.
This hub has a 13" hat style rotor that slips on over the hub.
With a bolt on bracket they use a different caliper.
(I believe they are late model Silverado calipers,... unlike the standard C10 D52 caliper)

All the track width changes are speculation,... in my opinion.
There is too much conflicting info being put out here and other message boards for me to ever repeat any of it as fact.
__________________
Keith

Convert to disc brakes.
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=444823
lolife99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2014, 11:21 PM   #33
JOHNORO
oldschoolblazer@yahoo.com
 
JOHNORO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Long Beach CA.
Posts: 1,968
Re: CPP Drop Spindles: Conflicting Information

Hope this helps...
Attached Images
 
JOHNORO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2014, 11:38 PM   #34
mtnbikerxt
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Cheshire, CT
Posts: 39
Re: CPP Drop Spindles: Conflicting Information

John, I have seen that document and it is linked above. I was about ready to order but decided to talk to CPP beforehand due to the lack of clarity in their documentation (catalog, website, etc.) Unfortunately, the customer service rep I spoke with did not provide the same information as found on the sheet you provided. This has caused a great deal of confusion on what exactly these spindles do to the track width of these trucks.

Can I ask where you got the sheet you have? I haven't seen it layed out like that before with dimensions 'from drum' and 'from disc' listed for all part numbers. Thanks!
mtnbikerxt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2014, 06:07 AM   #35
Bennett68C10
Registered User
 
Bennett68C10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Toms River, NJ
Posts: 5,518
Re: CPP Drop Spindles: Conflicting Information

Quote:
Originally Posted by big d's red67 View Post
This my truck Tommy is refering to, my track width from the out side of the tire to outside of the tire was 77 inches, after the install of the CPP modular spindles it was 74 9/16th inches from outside to outside of the tires.
Do you have the part number for the spindles you are using. Are they 2.5" drop or 2". I'm thinking about changing over to the modular spindles to gain a little fender clearance. Are you running 12" rotors and Wilwood d52's or a big brake kit.
__________________
Keith

66 Suburban

Burb Build Thread: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=751361

IG: bennett68c10
Bennett68C10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2014, 09:26 AM   #36
JOHNORO
oldschoolblazer@yahoo.com
 
JOHNORO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Long Beach CA.
Posts: 1,968
Re: CPP Drop Spindles: Conflicting Information

Quote:
Originally Posted by mtnbikerxt View Post
John, I have seen that document and it is linked above. I was about ready to order but decided to talk to CPP beforehand due to the lack of clarity in their documentation (catalog, website, etc.) Unfortunately, the customer service rep I spoke with did not provide the same information as found on the sheet you provided. This has caused a great deal of confusion on what exactly these spindles do to the track width of these trucks.

Can I ask where you got the sheet you have? I haven't seen it layed out like that before with dimensions 'from drum' and 'from disc' listed for all part numbers. Thanks!
I got the spec sheet while I was at Cpp yesterday. ..
They told me that this info is in the back of th new catalog as well as online, but they printed that particular sheet while there asking for clarification.
Javier or Jeff are the guys I ask for whenever I need anything answered..

Last edited by JOHNORO; 04-02-2014 at 09:33 AM.
JOHNORO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2014, 09:33 AM   #37
lolife99
67-72 parts collector,…
 
lolife99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Mid-MO
Posts: 22,702
Re: CPP Drop Spindles: Conflicting Information

The confusion still exists.
Nothing in that chart matches up with this statement about 1-1/8".
(that would be 9/16" per side or 1-1/8" per side)


QUOTE:
Looking for a spindle and brake kit for your lowered truck with big tires and wheels? CPP's introduces their new modular 2" drop spindle and drop spindle wheel kits for 1960-87 Chevy pickups. This exclusive new “Simple Offset Solution” or SOS™ design helps solve tire to fender interference commonly found with lowered trucks. This new SOS™ technology was designed to address concerns about using aftermarket big wheels and tires by using different spindle/rotor offsets. Classic Performance’s new modular spindle and bracket works with factory 1971-87 C10 brake components, or for a HIGH performance option, combine CPP’s spindle with their new Big Brake 13" Rotor, Twin 52mm Piston Brake Caliper kit.
Classic Performance’s new Modular Spindle offers many benefits available for the first time, installs easy without modifications, works with factory ball joints and tie rod ends, lowers your truck a full 2", offers adjustable steering stops, provides 1-1/8" more fender to tire clearance, allows use with standard factory brakes and performance aftermarket "BIG" Brake Kits
__________________
Keith

Convert to disc brakes.
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=444823

Last edited by lolife99; 04-02-2014 at 11:37 AM.
lolife99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2014, 09:36 AM   #38
lolife99
67-72 parts collector,…
 
lolife99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Mid-MO
Posts: 22,702
Re: CPP Drop Spindles: Conflicting Information

Then only this that can be assumed,... is that the CPP Modular spindles provide the "narrowest" track width.
We just don't know how much.

So don't buy your wheels or a-arm using any numbers other than what you have on your own tape measure, (in front of you),... after you have installed your spindles.
Whichever brand you choose to buy.
__________________
Keith

Convert to disc brakes.
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=444823

Last edited by lolife99; 10-13-2014 at 12:54 PM.
lolife99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2014, 09:44 AM   #39
big d's red67
Registered User
 
big d's red67's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Broken Arrow Okla.
Posts: 510
Re: CPP Drop Spindles: Conflicting Information

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bennett68C10 View Post
Do you have the part number for the spindles you are using. Are they 2.5" drop or 2". I'm thinking about changing over to the modular spindles to gain a little fender clearance. Are you running 12" rotors and Wilwood d52's or a big brake kit.
I do not have a part number for the old spindles they came in the disc brake kit that I bought. They are 2.5inch drop and I am running 12inch rotors with the Wilwood d52's. If you are want more tire to fender clearance I would recommend doing it.
__________________
1967 swb 454 cid 700R4 trans SOLD

2006 Chevy Trailblazer SS
2013 Camaro RS convertible the wife's

Build thread http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=573248
big d's red67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2014, 09:49 AM   #40
big d's red67
Registered User
 
big d's red67's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Broken Arrow Okla.
Posts: 510
Re: CPP Drop Spindles: Conflicting Information

[QUOTE=lolife99;6607765]The confusion still exists.
Nothing in that chart matches up with this statement about 1-1/8".
(that would be 5/8" per side or 1-1/8" per side)


We know for sure they will narrow the track width a little over an inch per side if you go from regular aftermarket drop spindles to the modular drop spindles.
__________________
1967 swb 454 cid 700R4 trans SOLD

2006 Chevy Trailblazer SS
2013 Camaro RS convertible the wife's

Build thread http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=573248
big d's red67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2014, 11:01 AM   #41
ksbrktracer
TNT-MOTORSPORTS
 
ksbrktracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: TULSA OKLAHOMA
Posts: 2,692
Re: CPP Drop Spindles: Conflicting Information

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bennett68C10 View Post
Do you have the part number for the spindles you are using. Are they 2.5" drop or 2". I'm thinking about changing over to the modular spindles to gain a little fender clearance. Are you running 12" rotors and Wilwood d52's or a big brake kit.

Keith
Dennis is using just the standard CPP modular spindle and bracket # CP30106-2 and bracket # 6087dbk . Those #'s are for a 63-70 balljoint. They are a 2" Drop.
ksbrktracer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2014, 11:46 AM   #42
tony58
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Orange, Calif
Posts: 183
Re: CPP Drop Spindles: Conflicting Information

That CPP list is typical of their inaccuracies. They have listed change compared to drum for 1971/72, show me 71/72 that came with front drums
tony58 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2014, 12:05 PM   #43
ksbrktracer
TNT-MOTORSPORTS
 
ksbrktracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: TULSA OKLAHOMA
Posts: 2,692
Re: CPP Drop Spindles: Conflicting Information

There is alot of information about drops out there (LoLife being one of the most knowledgable on the sight) ... CPP has done a really good job of confusing it for sure. If they would have come out and said that our spindle will do X it would have been way better for them.
When Dennis (big d's red67 ) bought spindles we werent positive what would happen , we only had the info that CPP had given us over the phone. This was my first experience with the modular spindle. I was pleasantly surprised when they showed up at the quality of the spindle, brackets and hardware.
Dennis has a killer truck with the Eagle 225's and 4.5" backspace 20X8.5's on the front. It was a new build when I met him at the Starbird Show. At that point he hadnt driven it much I dont believe. A few days later he came to my Shop and we talked about the tires rubbing on the fender well and what might fix it. Experience told me that a wheel with more backspacing would definitely help but he liked the wheels on the truck so we talked about other options available and settled on trying the modular spindles hoping that they would do what they (CPP) said they would do. As you can see by his own account they fixed his problem .... they pulled the wheels in enough that they do not rub now. Dont forget though .... he went from 2.5'' to 2.0'' drop on the spindles.

I guess my whole point is that CPP modular spindles do narrow the front track compared to other spindles that are out there (Dennis's truck proves that without a doubt) . Yes there is some debate as to how much and I dont think anyone has done a definitive test to know exactly how much . But if you are in a position were you need to narrow the track on your truck .... I think the modular spindles are a viable option and probably one of the most reasonable ways to do so given the other options out there (narrowed control arms, different backspacing etc).
ksbrktracer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2014, 12:10 PM   #44
sduckworth13
Registered User
 
sduckworth13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Kansas City, Missouri
Posts: 3,541
Re: CPP Drop Spindles: Conflicting Information

Thanks Tommy for the info.
__________________
Scott
sduckworth13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2014, 12:15 PM   #45
sduckworth13
Registered User
 
sduckworth13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Kansas City, Missouri
Posts: 3,541
Re: CPP Drop Spindles: Conflicting Information

Tommy, looks like a 20x8.5 with 4.5 in backspace on the front is the perfect choice if using the CPP modular drop spindle. What is the backspace on the rear wheels?
__________________
Scott
sduckworth13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2014, 12:26 PM   #46
ksbrktracer
TNT-MOTORSPORTS
 
ksbrktracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: TULSA OKLAHOMA
Posts: 2,692
Re: CPP Drop Spindles: Conflicting Information

Quote:
Originally Posted by sduckworth13 View Post
Tommy, looks like a 20x8.5 with 4.5 in backspace on the front is the perfect choice if using the CPP modular drop spindle. What is the backspace on the rear wheels?
Im gonna have to let Dennis answer that ... Im not sure , I Know he has 20X10's .

I will tell you that when I sell back wheels I reccommend 20X10's with 5.50 backspace for a fleetside with the wide rear axle . And depending on the drop a 285/40/20 or 295/40/20 tire with something along the lines of a 255/40/20 on the front and a 20X8.5 with 5.25 backspace when using standard drop spindles
ksbrktracer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2014, 12:31 PM   #47
sduckworth13
Registered User
 
sduckworth13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Kansas City, Missouri
Posts: 3,541
Re: CPP Drop Spindles: Conflicting Information

Thank you.
__________________
Scott
sduckworth13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2014, 12:40 PM   #48
big d's red67
Registered User
 
big d's red67's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Broken Arrow Okla.
Posts: 510
Re: CPP Drop Spindles: Conflicting Information

Quote:
Originally Posted by ksbrktracer View Post
Dont forget though .... he went from 2.5'' to 2.0'' drop on the spindles.
They really isn't that much different in the drop amount. Less than a 1/4 of an inch.
__________________
1967 swb 454 cid 700R4 trans SOLD

2006 Chevy Trailblazer SS
2013 Camaro RS convertible the wife's

Build thread http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=573248
big d's red67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2014, 12:41 PM   #49
big d's red67
Registered User
 
big d's red67's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Broken Arrow Okla.
Posts: 510
Re: CPP Drop Spindles: Conflicting Information

Quote:
Originally Posted by sduckworth13 View Post
Tommy, looks like a 20x8.5 with 4.5 in backspace on the front is the perfect choice if using the CPP modular drop spindle. What is the backspace on the rear wheels?
They are 20x10 with 5.5inch BS.
__________________
1967 swb 454 cid 700R4 trans SOLD

2006 Chevy Trailblazer SS
2013 Camaro RS convertible the wife's

Build thread http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=573248
big d's red67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2014, 12:44 PM   #50
sduckworth13
Registered User
 
sduckworth13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Kansas City, Missouri
Posts: 3,541
Re: CPP Drop Spindles: Conflicting Information

Thank you for all the info.
__________________
Scott
sduckworth13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com