The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Suspension

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-27-2010, 10:30 AM   #26
scooterskoolkustoms
Registered User
 
scooterskoolkustoms's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: so cal
Posts: 436
Re: Less costly front suspension

no I want to by one from him,but would like to do a test fit on cad first.If its going to fit and work the CAD program will show me first.
__________________
big old burb in primer.lot of work to do.
scooterskoolkustoms is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2010, 11:06 AM   #27
Shane
Account Suspended
 
Shane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: over yonder
Posts: 14,270
Re: Less costly front suspension

So you do want him to give you his design. Gotcha.
Shane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2010, 12:03 PM   #28
PBFAB.COM
Senior Member
 
PBFAB.COM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Mesa,Az
Posts: 3,981
Re: Less costly front suspension

What suspension design/analyzer do you intend to use?

Do you have the proper knowledge on suspension design/geometry/kinematics to offer an "engineered" product that has been proven both on paper and in real life?

Are you ready to buy that big insurance policy?

Please don't take this in the wrong light, as I admire the ambition, but there is a lot to think about when intending to market and produce a product like this. These are just a few of countless, important questions that will arise. It's a lot more involved than just cutting and welding a crossmember together. I am sure you have thought of some of these things already. Again, good luck in the venture, and I admire your drive... that's how it all strated for me.
__________________
www.PorterbuiltFabrication.com

Phone: 480-297-2621

E-mail: sales@pbfab.com


Find us on FaceBook under Porterbuilt Fabrication

Specializing in Chassis and Suspension Components for your Classic Chevrolet Truck.

We offer components from the following manufacturers:

Porterbuilt
Accuair
Ridetech (Air Ride Technologies)
Air Lift
Wilwood
Intro
Unisteer
ECE
Gotta Show
Air Lift
Borgeson
CPP


Supporting this forum since 2003!
PBFAB.COM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2010, 12:37 PM   #29
scooterskoolkustoms
Registered User
 
scooterskoolkustoms's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: so cal
Posts: 436
Re: Less costly front suspension

porterbuilt is right,there is a lot involved,I like to do things myself,All I said was if I buy the new part I would feel safe if I saw how it was going together.I have worked on cars for 40 yr's.And my CAD skills are just fine.I worked on the re design of Santa Monica blvd.I have helped the engineers with bridges,worked with the design of all the high pressure gas piping in s-calif.I did not mean to step on anyones toes,just said before I buy A new un-proven style front end it would be nice if I could look at it first.
__________________
big old burb in primer.lot of work to do.
scooterskoolkustoms is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2010, 01:31 PM   #30
N2TRUX
Happy to be here
 
N2TRUX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 39,021
Re: Less costly front suspension

scooterskoolkustoms- I don't think Shane was questioning your knowledge or intentions. Think about what your asking though. You want him to share his CAD file with a stranger so you can verify the design integrity? If you had designed a product with the intentions of possibly marketing it, would you do that?

I'm thinking probably not, unless you were sending that proposed product to a licensed lab for design integrity analysis.
__________________
Follow me on Facebook and Instagram @N2trux.com

Articles-

"Jake" the 84 to 74 crewcab

"Elwood" the77_Remix

85 GMC Sierra "Scarlett"

"Refining Sierra"
N2TRUX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2010, 03:38 PM   #31
blazerboy72
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Temple, Ga
Posts: 854
Re: Less costly front suspension

I wont be sending a cad file out only because I don't want someone building something that hasn't been tested. I'm not in this for the money so after I have tested it and made sure every thing works properly I will be happy to send a cad file, just not until I know for sure that this is a safe product. I don't see any reason why it wouldn't be I just don't want to take the chance. If its going to kill some one it will be me.

Last edited by blazerboy72; 02-27-2010 at 05:15 PM.
blazerboy72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2010, 10:24 AM   #32
crakarjax
Registered User
 
crakarjax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 1,302
Re: Less costly front suspension

I like it already. Not enough competition in this marketplace if you ask me, but that's probably because there's not enough demand.
__________________
1968 LWB C20 / AC / Wood Bed
crakarjax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2010, 11:23 AM   #33
bruce bruce
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Bakersfield, Ca.
Posts: 180
Re: Less costly front suspension

I recently got my dropmember from Nathan and there is allot to it. All the fasteners and machined pieces are crazy. I think it's a smokin deal considering what's involved. Keep up the good work Nathan!
bruce bruce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2010, 04:37 PM   #34
blazerboy72
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Temple, Ga
Posts: 854
Re: Less costly front suspension

Yes his is a great deal for what you get. If mine works it will be no where near as "fancy" few if any machined parts.
blazerboy72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2010, 01:19 AM   #35
cajundragger
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: louisiana
Posts: 1,008
Re: Less costly front suspension

Quote:
Originally Posted by porterbuilt View Post
What suspension design/analyzer do you intend to use?

Do you have the proper knowledge on suspension design/geometry/kinematics to offer an "engineered" product that has been proven both on paper and in real life?

Are you ready to buy that big insurance policy?

Please don't take this in the wrong light, as I admire the ambition, but there is a lot to think about when intending to market and produce a product like this. These are just a few of countless, important questions that will arise. It's a lot more involved than just cutting and welding a crossmember together. I am sure you have thought of some of these things already. Again, good luck in the venture, and I admire your drive... that's how it all strated for me.
I been using lotus, what do you use?
cajundragger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2010, 02:08 AM   #36
PBFAB.COM
Senior Member
 
PBFAB.COM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Mesa,Az
Posts: 3,981
Re: Less costly front suspension

Quote:
Originally Posted by cajundragger View Post
I been using lotus, what do you use?
I use the Bill Mitchell WinGeo software for suspension analysis.
__________________
www.PorterbuiltFabrication.com

Phone: 480-297-2621

E-mail: sales@pbfab.com


Find us on FaceBook under Porterbuilt Fabrication

Specializing in Chassis and Suspension Components for your Classic Chevrolet Truck.

We offer components from the following manufacturers:

Porterbuilt
Accuair
Ridetech (Air Ride Technologies)
Air Lift
Wilwood
Intro
Unisteer
ECE
Gotta Show
Air Lift
Borgeson
CPP


Supporting this forum since 2003!
PBFAB.COM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2010, 08:01 PM   #37
blazerboy72
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Temple, Ga
Posts: 854
Re: Less costly front suspension

Well this is taking much longer than I had planned. Some how the metal place got st. Louis Missouri mixed up with Temple Georgia and that has taken 3 weeks to get fixed. The metal finally left this morning headed to the correct state but I am having similar issues getting my gas bottle filled, seems like everyone in georgia is out of 75/25
blazerboy72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2010, 04:37 PM   #38
8mpg
Registered User
 
8mpg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: DFW, Texas
Posts: 389
Re: Less costly front suspension

Any updates?

Find a good local place that refills... not someone that sends their tanks to get refilled.
8mpg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2010, 06:24 PM   #39
blazerboy72
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Temple, Ga
Posts: 854
Re: Less costly front suspension

Yes I have mine just about done but there is so much work and time involved there is no way I could produce them for other people in a timely manner and keep my full time job.
blazerboy72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2010, 06:36 PM   #40
8mpg
Registered User
 
8mpg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: DFW, Texas
Posts: 389
Re: Less costly front suspension

pics? Just wondering what it looks like. Im really thinking of cutting my crossmember for now.
8mpg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2010, 06:40 PM   #41
blazerboy72
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Temple, Ga
Posts: 854
Re: Less costly front suspension

I have to pull it back out Thursday to finish welding and make a few adjustments, Ill try to get some pics. I still need to get the notch for the rack done and the bag mounts.
blazerboy72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2010, 06:32 AM   #42
andrewmp6
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Louisville,Ky
Posts: 5,811
Re: Less costly front suspension

I wouldn't run a mustang 2 kit on anything that's not a straight axle even then id still pass on it.I have drove a few cars with them and didn't like the ride or handling.Anyone can make a crossmember like Nate's but the welds he lays down and all the time spent designing it so it don't ride bad or handle bad takes time trial and error.If i wanted my truck to lay frame he would be the first person I'd call.
andrewmp6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2010, 06:11 PM   #43
joe231
Registered User
 
joe231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Palmer, Alaska
Posts: 13,821
Re: Less costly front suspension

update??
__________________
CHEVY ONLY
joe231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2010, 06:17 PM   #44
blazerboy72
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Temple, Ga
Posts: 854
Re: Less costly front suspension

Project got side tracked for a week or two while I try to get my cam installed and motor back running.
blazerboy72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2010, 06:29 PM   #45
joe231
Registered User
 
joe231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Palmer, Alaska
Posts: 13,821
Re: Less costly front suspension

__________________
CHEVY ONLY
joe231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2010, 04:07 AM   #46
DirtyEd
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Dallas Ga.
Posts: 15
Re: Less costly front suspension

I am only 20 min. down the road in Yorkville.I would love to check it out and maybe have one built for my 66.PM me and lets see if we can get together.
DirtyEd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2010, 04:35 AM   #47
blazerboy72
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Temple, Ga
Posts: 854
Re: Less costly front suspension

will do just let me get it operational first.
blazerboy72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2010, 11:26 AM   #48
crakarjax
Registered User
 
crakarjax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 1,302
Re: Less costly front suspension

Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewmp6 View Post
I wouldn't run a mustang 2 kit on anything that's not a straight axle even then id still pass on it.I have drove a few cars with them and didn't like the ride or handling.Anyone can make a crossmember like Nate's but the welds he lays down and all the time spent designing it so it don't ride bad or handle bad takes time trial and error.If i wanted my truck to lay frame he would be the first person I'd call.
Trial and error is the method that the Russians used to get into space. They would build rockets, strap a dog or person into it, and see if it worked. If not, they needed a new astonaut.

Real engineers shoot for trial and success! Front end geometry is well-defined, and with modern engineering tools the design should be right both on paper and on the truck.
__________________
1968 LWB C20 / AC / Wood Bed
crakarjax is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2025 67-72chevytrucks.com