The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-11-2012, 11:15 PM   #26
mahanian
C10 addict
 
mahanian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,432
Re: Issues with CPP tubular upper control arm

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tmend View Post
Yea saw it ...zoomed in
Posted via Mobile Device
Good old phone pictures
__________________
Jared

67 C10 CST Short Fleet Big Window
65 C10 Custom Short Fleet Big Window
67 Camaro RS
mahanian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2012, 11:16 PM   #27
mahanian
C10 addict
 
mahanian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,432
Re: Issues with CPP tubular upper control arm

Quote:
Originally Posted by lolife99 View Post
Yes.

Look here:
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=537266

Member Gringoloco is getting ready to install a set of lowers on his truck.
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=444746

Portebuilt makes them for bagged trucks and has a bolt in adapter to hold a coil spring also!
Wow, those are really tempting!!
__________________
Jared

67 C10 CST Short Fleet Big Window
65 C10 Custom Short Fleet Big Window
67 Camaro RS
mahanian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2012, 11:19 PM   #28
lolife99
67-72 parts collector,…
 
lolife99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Mid-MO
Posts: 22,692
Re: Issues with CPP tubular upper control arm

Quote:
Originally Posted by mahanian View Post
Wow, those are really tempting!!
Yes they are.
The caster gains are the big bonus,... but I like more,... the fact that they help center the wheel in the fender!
__________________
Keith

Convert to disc brakes.
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=444823
lolife99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2012, 11:22 PM   #29
mahanian
C10 addict
 
mahanian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,432
Re: Issues with CPP tubular upper control arm

They will have to be a future purchase, do you think moving up to a 2" drop spring would help if the alignment shop can't get me some negative camber?
__________________
Jared

67 C10 CST Short Fleet Big Window
65 C10 Custom Short Fleet Big Window
67 Camaro RS
mahanian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2012, 11:24 PM   #30
lolife99
67-72 parts collector,…
 
lolife99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Mid-MO
Posts: 22,692
Re: Issues with CPP tubular upper control arm

Quote:
Originally Posted by mahanian View Post
They will have to be a future purchase, do you think moving up to a 2" drop spring would help if the alignment shop can't get me some negative camber?
Sure.
But I would just trim those since you already have them.
__________________
Keith

Convert to disc brakes.
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=444823
lolife99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2012, 11:27 PM   #31
Tmend
Senior Member
 
Tmend's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Reseda CA
Posts: 1,263
Re: Issues with CPP tubular upper control arm

If u get a higher spring it will give even more camber- thats why the upper arms give u more camber people by them when unlower trucks cuz the lower u go the camber becomes neg so the arms makeup the diff
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
Some progress is better then no progress
Tmend is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2012, 11:36 PM   #32
Tmend
Senior Member
 
Tmend's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Reseda CA
Posts: 1,263
Re: Issues with CPP tubular upper control arm

Without the wheel the rotor looks pretty straight or em I seeing things
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
Some progress is better then no progress
Tmend is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2012, 11:39 PM   #33
mahanian
C10 addict
 
mahanian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,432
Re: Issues with CPP tubular upper control arm

Quote:
Originally Posted by lolife99 View Post
Sure.
But I would just trim those since you already have them.
Don't I have to take a complete coil off to make it seat properly in the cups? A full coil would probably be a substantial drop

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tmend View Post
If u get a higher spring it will give even more camber- thats why the upper arms give u more camber people by them when unlower trucks cuz the lower u go the camber becomes neg so the arms makeup the diff
Posted via Mobile Device
Sorry, when I said move up to a 2" drop spring I meant move up from a 1.5" drop spring to a 2" drop spring.
__________________
Jared

67 C10 CST Short Fleet Big Window
65 C10 Custom Short Fleet Big Window
67 Camaro RS
mahanian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2012, 11:41 PM   #34
Tmend
Senior Member
 
Tmend's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Reseda CA
Posts: 1,263
Re: Issues with CPP tubular upper control arm

Quote:
Originally Posted by mahanian View Post
Don't I have to take a complete coil off to make it seat properly in the cups? A full coil would probably be a substantial drop



Sorry, when I said move up to a 2" drop spring I meant move up from a 1.5" drop spring to a 2" drop spring.
Ok yea that would help some
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
Some progress is better then no progress
Tmend is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2012, 11:42 PM   #35
mahanian
C10 addict
 
mahanian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,432
Re: Issues with CPP tubular upper control arm

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tmend View Post
Without the wheel the rotor looks pretty straight or em I seeing things
Posted via Mobile Device
Those pictures are a little misleading because the driver side still has the tire on so the blocks aren't the exact same height as it would be with a wheel and tire. The first couple pictures show how the tire angles out towards the top.
__________________
Jared

67 C10 CST Short Fleet Big Window
65 C10 Custom Short Fleet Big Window
67 Camaro RS
mahanian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2012, 11:55 PM   #36
lolife99
67-72 parts collector,…
 
lolife99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Mid-MO
Posts: 22,692
Re: Issues with CPP tubular upper control arm

Quote:
Originally Posted by mahanian View Post
Don't I have to take a complete coil off to make it seat properly in the cups?
A full coil would probably be a substantial drop
I cut a half coil all the time.
You can cut less.
Just seat the top of the spring in the spring pocket.
(up in the crossmember)

1/2 coil cut = approximately 1" of drop.

The real question,... is the truck the height you want it now?
If it is,... I wouldn't lower it any more.

Have you even driven it yet?
I would put a few miles on the truck prior to alignment to make sure the springs settle.
Also take some good measurements of the fender height.
Make sure it is equal on both sides now and after the alignment.
Many times the passenger side is slightly higher.
__________________
Keith

Convert to disc brakes.
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=444823
lolife99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2012, 12:19 AM   #37
mahanian
C10 addict
 
mahanian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,432
Re: Issues with CPP tubular upper control arm

Quote:
Originally Posted by lolife99 View Post
I cut a half coil all the time.
You can cut less.
Just seat the top of the spring in the spring pocket.
(up in the crossmember)

1/2 coil cut = approximately 1" of drop.

The real question,... is the truck the height you want it now?
If it is,... I wouldn't lower it any more.

Have you even driven it yet?
I would put a few miles on the truck prior to alignment to make sure the springs settle.
Also take some good measurements of the fender height.
Make sure it is equal on both sides now and after the alignment.
Many times the passenger side is slightly higher.
Good advice, thanks. I've only driven it about a mile so far, I put in a new engine and transmission as well so I'm still breaking them in. I think I'll throw on some stock wheels and tires and cruise it for a short while before I take it in to get aligned.
__________________
Jared

67 C10 CST Short Fleet Big Window
65 C10 Custom Short Fleet Big Window
67 Camaro RS
mahanian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2012, 10:45 AM   #38
BMERDOC
Registered User
 
BMERDOC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Richmond,Va
Posts: 2,934
Re: Issues with CPP tubular upper control arm

I am at work so I only had a second to scan your thread. Given the parts that you installed and the info provided you have the wrong upper arms. Install the stock uppers again to see if that corrects the problem. The spindles and springs shouldn't affect the suspension like that. You're gonna have to call cpp and get the correct uppers. Don't get an alignment yet. There is no way that will rectify the situation.
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
Nick Carter
1967 C10 Short bed Fleetside
Project Cheap Thrills!
2WD C10 Modern/Performance Alignments
Easiest Alignment Ever!
BMERDOC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2012, 12:20 PM   #39
mahanian
C10 addict
 
mahanian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,432
Re: Issues with CPP tubular upper control arm

Unfortunately I don't have the stock upper control arms anymore

Keith,
Would you mind taking a measurement on your CPP tubular arms from the cross shaft to the some point on the ball joint?
__________________
Jared

67 C10 CST Short Fleet Big Window
65 C10 Custom Short Fleet Big Window
67 Camaro RS
mahanian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2012, 12:25 PM   #40
mahanian
C10 addict
 
mahanian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,432
Re: Issues with CPP tubular upper control arm

Keith,
If you could measure the center of the cross shaft to the center of the inboard surface of the ball joint on your CPP control arms that would be very helpful
Attached Images
 
__________________
Jared

67 C10 CST Short Fleet Big Window
65 C10 Custom Short Fleet Big Window
67 Camaro RS
mahanian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2012, 01:00 PM   #41
BMERDOC
Registered User
 
BMERDOC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Richmond,Va
Posts: 2,934
Re: Issues with CPP tubular upper control arm

I went out and measured the stock upper arm. From the face of the crossshaft where the forward retaining nut is to the c/l of the zerk fitting on top of the upper ball joint is 9". I can't post pics from my phone but if you need it I can post it from my laptop later.
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
Nick Carter
1967 C10 Short bed Fleetside
Project Cheap Thrills!
2WD C10 Modern/Performance Alignments
Easiest Alignment Ever!
BMERDOC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2012, 01:06 PM   #42
Lee H
Registered User
 
Lee H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Upland Ca
Posts: 4,141
Re: Issues with CPP tubular upper control arm

That measurement on my 72 with CCP tubular arms is 7 3/4.
__________________
1972 C10 SWB, Air, PS, PB, 350/350THM. Second owner.

1965 Corvette roadster, 44K miles, 327/365 SHP, 4 speed, side exhaust, knockoffs, teak, second owner (bought in 1970), Have ALL numbers matching components.

My frame off restoration thread: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=556703
Lee H is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2012, 01:14 PM   #43
mahanian
C10 addict
 
mahanian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,432
Re: Issues with CPP tubular upper control arm

Thanks for the measurements guys, I will run home on my lunch break and measure mine.

I doubled checked the part number I ordered and it's correct. If they mixed up the parts I doubt they will do anything since it's been 8 months.
__________________
Jared

67 C10 CST Short Fleet Big Window
65 C10 Custom Short Fleet Big Window
67 Camaro RS
mahanian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2012, 01:50 PM   #44
19stepSide72
wanna be 67
 
19stepSide72's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 696
Re: Issues with CPP tubular upper control arm

CPP exchanged motor mounts for me over a year later. They understood we buy parts as we can. That was a year ago too. I would at least call and ask. I have these same upper and lowers tubular but the truck is in paint jail and away from me to measure.
Posted via Mobile Device
19stepSide72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2012, 01:55 PM   #45
mahanian
C10 addict
 
mahanian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,432
Re: Issues with CPP tubular upper control arm

Thanks, it's worth asking if they are indeed the wrong parts
__________________
Jared

67 C10 CST Short Fleet Big Window
65 C10 Custom Short Fleet Big Window
67 Camaro RS
mahanian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2012, 03:11 PM   #46
mahanian
C10 addict
 
mahanian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,432
Re: Issues with CPP tubular upper control arm

I measured the control arm and it's 7 3/4" as well, I'm going to take it to the alignment shop and have them measure the camber and see if the positive angle is just an optical illusion
__________________
Jared

67 C10 CST Short Fleet Big Window
65 C10 Custom Short Fleet Big Window
67 Camaro RS
mahanian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2012, 08:05 PM   #47
BMERDOC
Registered User
 
BMERDOC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Richmond,Va
Posts: 2,934
Re: Issues with CPP tubular upper control arm

Quote:
Originally Posted by mahanian View Post
I measured the control arm and it's 7 3/4" as well, I'm going to take it to the alignment shop and have them measure the camber and see if the positive angle is just an optical illusion
Looking at the pics on a laptop, the pics with the tire/wheel on do look like it has A LOT of positive camber but the pics without the tire look perfectly fine. Maybe it would be worth putting it on the rack and getting the numbers after all.
__________________
Nick Carter
1967 C10 Short bed Fleetside
Project Cheap Thrills!
2WD C10 Modern/Performance Alignments
Easiest Alignment Ever!
BMERDOC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2012, 01:29 PM   #48
Hart_Rod
*************
 
Hart_Rod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Pensacola, FL
Posts: 17,837
Re: Issues with CPP tubular upper control arm

Any updates?
Hart_Rod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2012, 08:42 PM   #49
mahanian
C10 addict
 
mahanian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,432
Re: Issues with CPP tubular upper control arm

I got the truck aligned and the best they could do was +0.5 camber. So for my truck the CPP upper tubular control arms won't get me the -0.5 camber I want with just a 1 1/2" drop spring.
__________________
Jared

67 C10 CST Short Fleet Big Window
65 C10 Custom Short Fleet Big Window
67 Camaro RS
mahanian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2012, 09:16 PM   #50
Hart_Rod
*************
 
Hart_Rod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Pensacola, FL
Posts: 17,837
Re: Issues with CPP tubular upper control arm

Quote:
Originally Posted by mahanian View Post
I got the truck aligned and the best they could do was +0.5 camber. So for my truck the CPP upper tubular control arms won't get me the -0.5 camber I want with just a 1 1/2" drop spring.
Now you got me worried, . The only reason I installed the CPP arms were to be able to get a good alignment without a bunch of shims. I've got 2.5-3" drop springs so hopefully it will work out.....
Hart_Rod is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com