The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevy/GMC Suburbans & Panels Message Board > 1967 - 1972 Chevy/GMC Suburbans and PanelsProjects and Builds

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-22-2025, 02:45 PM   #1
nsiti
Active Member
 
Join Date: May 2022
Location: NY,NY
Posts: 108
Re: 1972 Suburban 4X4 3/4 Ton K20 "The Beast"

I thought I'd report back with the little progress that's been made over the past few months.

The camshaft came back from Howards and was re-installed. This time it was a perfect fit. They never confirmed what the problem was. I suspect they had sent me the wrong grind initially. This made it so we could continue with the top end of the motor, see attached photos. Any suggestions as to what color to paint the engine block when it's assembled? The truck will be painted Dark Olive Metallic, with a white roof and upper rear barn doors (including rear pillars).

One interesting thing to note about the Dart Sportsman block is the peculiar design of the dipstick hole, which does not allow much clearance. This necessitated some grinding of the freeze plug boss on the block as well as the dipstick tube base so that the Milodon 22005 stainless braided could fit.

In addition, we finally got the rear wood bed seated and placed on new bushings.

Now to finalize the bodywork in preparation for painting this summer.

Cheers,
Nick
Attached Images
    
nsiti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2025, 01:36 AM   #2
Richard
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Southern California
Posts: 3,346
Re: 1972 Suburban 4X4 3/4 Ton K20 "The Beast"

I would suggest that you address the rear suspension before going on the road. The rear shackle flip hanger needs to move forward so the shackle is pointing down. The way it is now it will most likely invert and lock the spring against the frame not allowing any movement. Real bad ride and a recipe for disaster. Have to be careful when going to a compression type shackle. Proper placement is needed to avoid inversion. The spring cannot compress as you have it now. Probably why you think it sits high.
__________________
Richard
1972 K10 Custom Deluxe SWB Fleetside
My build https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/...d.php?t=800746
Richard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2025, 07:57 AM   #3
nsiti
Active Member
 
Join Date: May 2022
Location: NY,NY
Posts: 108
Re: 1972 Suburban 4X4 3/4 Ton K20 "The Beast"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard View Post
I would suggest that you address the rear suspension before going on the road. The rear shackle flip hanger needs to move forward so the shackle is pointing down. The way it is now it will most likely invert and lock the spring against the frame not allowing any movement. Real bad ride and a recipe for disaster. Have to be careful when going to a compression type shackle. Proper placement is needed to avoid inversion. The spring cannot compress as you have it now. Probably why you think it sits high.
Richard, thank you

We are also concerned about the shackle flip angle, so I reached out to Offroad Design, where the kit was purchased from. Kyle over there responded as follows:
Regarding the weight sitting on the springs, there is a body but it more or less is a bare shell at the moment. It makes sense that your shackles are sitting at a forward angle, our springs are much more reactive to weight than a standard lift kit springs and a set of springs for a Suburban are built heavier to start with to compensate for the addition body weight. Once the truck is full assembled the springs will flatten out and correct the shackle angle.
Nevertheless, this remains a concern for us and we agree this needs to be addressed before hitting the road. I really appreciate your comment and wonder what you think of ORD's response? What angle would you consider safe, and do you have suggestions for us to consider in case their theory is not correct?

Regards,
Nick
nsiti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2025, 09:44 PM   #4
Richard
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Southern California
Posts: 3,346
Re: 1972 Suburban 4X4 3/4 Ton K20 "The Beast"

Quote:
Originally Posted by nsiti View Post
Richard, thank you

We are also concerned about the shackle flip angle, so I reached out to Offroad Design, where the kit was purchased from. Kyle over there responded as follows:
Regarding the weight sitting on the springs, there is a body but it more or less is a bare shell at the moment. It makes sense that your shackles are sitting at a forward angle, our springs are much more reactive to weight than a standard lift kit springs and a set of springs for a Suburban are built heavier to start with to compensate for the addition body weight. Once the truck is full assembled the springs will flatten out and correct the shackle angle.
Nevertheless, this remains a concern for us and we agree this needs to be addressed before hitting the road. I really appreciate your comment and wonder what you think of ORD's response? What angle would you consider safe, and do you have suggestions for us to consider in case their theory is not correct?

Regards,
Nick
Would bet if you hit the shackle up with a hammer (dead blow if you have one) with the truck weight on spring it will swing up to the frame. If you hit it down it might swing back. As it sits the spring is bound up and in use the shackle will want to swing the wrong way. The shackle needs to be in path of rear swing at full droop to prevent inversion. Hope that makes sense.
__________________
Richard
1972 K10 Custom Deluxe SWB Fleetside
My build https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/...d.php?t=800746
Richard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2025, 12:40 PM   #5
nsiti
Active Member
 
Join Date: May 2022
Location: NY,NY
Posts: 108
Re: 1972 Suburban 4X4 3/4 Ton K20 "The Beast"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard View Post
Would bet if you hit the shackle up with a hammer (dead blow if you have one) with the truck weight on spring it will swing up to the frame. If you hit it down it might swing back. As it sits the spring is bound up and in use the shackle will want to swing the wrong way. The shackle needs to be in path of rear swing at full droop to prevent inversion. Hope that makes sense.
Richard, thanks, my interpretation is that we need to make sure the shackle swings towards the rear. We'll definitely address this when more weight is placed on the rear. The springs and shackles will definitely need some persuasion from a dead blow hammer (and hopefully that's all)!
nsiti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2025, 02:33 PM   #6
Richard
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Southern California
Posts: 3,346
Re: 1972 Suburban 4X4 3/4 Ton K20 "The Beast"

Unfortunately the hanger needs to be moved or the spring de-arched to make it longer at rest. If just hitting the shackle to move it with a load on it. As soon as unloaded such as going over a bump the spring will pull shackle back as it is now and next bump will invert it to the frame. With a compression shackle as you have the shackle must be in the rear path with the spring unloaded. Make sense? Just trying to help you understand how it will work.
__________________
Richard
1972 K10 Custom Deluxe SWB Fleetside
My build https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/...d.php?t=800746
Richard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2025, 05:24 PM   #7
nsiti
Active Member
 
Join Date: May 2022
Location: NY,NY
Posts: 108
Re: 1972 Suburban 4X4 3/4 Ton K20 "The Beast"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard View Post
Unfortunately the hanger needs to be moved or the spring de-arched to make it longer at rest. If just hitting the shackle to move it with a load on it. As soon as unloaded such as going over a bump the spring will pull shackle back as it is now and next bump will invert it to the frame. With a compression shackle as you have the shackle must be in the rear path with the spring unloaded. Make sense? Just trying to help you understand how it will work.
Hi, yes, ORD says the spring will de-arch with some movement and some weight on it. I'll report back on the actual outcome!
nsiti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2025, 12:45 AM   #8
Richard
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Southern California
Posts: 3,346
Re: 1972 Suburban 4X4 3/4 Ton K20 "The Beast"

I came across this by accident and thought it may help https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/...1&postcount=71 About the max angle you can get away with on a compression shackle. Notice there is zero weight on the spring.
__________________
Richard
1972 K10 Custom Deluxe SWB Fleetside
My build https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/...d.php?t=800746
Richard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2025, 04:31 PM   #9
nsiti
Active Member
 
Join Date: May 2022
Location: NY,NY
Posts: 108
Re: 1972 Suburban 4X4 3/4 Ton K20 "The Beast"

Hi all, I hope you had a wonderful Thanksgiving.

I'm back to report that the build continues. It's painfully slow progress but we are very close to the paint stage. Hopefully it's all downhill after that (famous last words!).

In the meantime, I'm still dealing with the rear leaf spring issue where the ride angle is improper and too high (see posts 79 and 83 for photos). I continue to be in conversation with ORD as to how to best proceed. Based on our analysis and thoughtful comments by Richard and others on this board we have pushed back against the theory that the rear springs will settle. Unfortunately, the rear leaf springs were improperly designed.

Originally, I ordered a full suspension set, with 5" lift including rear shackle flip, from ORD and it seems they miscalculated in the design of the rear leaf springs (the front are fine).

When I placed the order I was not asked for the weight of the vehicle, which is stock, except for the 40 gallon fuel tank. Now I am being asked for the weight and thought I would get some advice from you as to how to respond. Any assistance would be appreciated. I've also posted this in the 4x4 section.

Once this is settled, I trust I will have more time to post lots of progress photos in the coming weeks.

Thanks,
Nick

Last edited by nsiti; 11-29-2025 at 04:37 PM.
nsiti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2025, 05:45 PM   #10
LockDoc
The Older Generation


 
LockDoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Montezuma, Iowa
Posts: 26,741
Re: 1972 Suburban 4X4 3/4 Ton K20 "The Beast"

-
It might be hard to figure with a 40 gallon tank. There will be a lot of weight difference full and empty (or almost empty). Approximately 330#. I suppose you would use half of that for a static weight.

Here is the information for the '72 3/4 ton 4x4 Suburban posted by member "Vectorit" back in 2013.

3/4-Ton Commercial 4x4 - Model C/Series 20 - 127-in. w.b

Here is a link to the full thread for anyone that might need it...

https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/...d.php?t=575238
.
Attached Images
 
__________________
Leon

Locksmith, Specializing In Antique Trucks, Automobiles, & Motorcycles

(My Dually Pickup Project Thread)

http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=829820

-

Last edited by LockDoc; 12-02-2025 at 11:01 AM.
LockDoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2025, 07:47 PM   #11
nsiti
Active Member
 
Join Date: May 2022
Location: NY,NY
Posts: 108
Re: 1972 Suburban 4X4 3/4 Ton K20 "The Beast"

Quote:
Originally Posted by LockDoc View Post
-
It might be hard to figure with a 40 gallon tank. There will be a lot of weight difference full and empty (or almost empty). Approximately 330#. I suppose you would use half of that for a static weight.

Here is the information for the '72 3/4 ton 4x4 Suburban posted by member "Vectorit" back in 2013.

Here is a link to the full thread for anyone that might need it...

https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/...d.php?t=575238
.
Hi, thanks for sharing.

I've given some thought as to how to account for the weight of a larger gas tank. It's heavier than stock (maybe 50 lbs?), plus 20 gallons additional max capacity (124 lbs), so that's about 175 lbs extra weight when full. That's the equivalent of an average person's weight. These heavy duty springs probably wouldn't sag much with an extra 175 lbs of weight, but something to consider in the design.

I also looked at the full range of vehicle weights in the link you provided and compared them to the figures you posted, which raises some concern as to accuracy for the 1972 3/4 ton 4x4. Notice that the weight difference of the doors (4,141 lbs) vs gate (4,585) figures you posted is 444 lbs, while in all other instances the differences are near zero. Any idea why that might be? I would guess it's a typo.

To cross reference, I looked at the official Chevy Suburban 1972 spec sheet and read that the curb weight is 4,857 for the 8-cylinder K20 variant (with a fairly even 2,374 lb / 2,483 lb front / rear split).

All this analysis made me think, what are we trying to measure when designing for the weight load capacity of rear leaf springs? They are not going to support the entire rear weight of the truck, but rather the frame and body weight, excluding the axle, wheels and tires, right?

Any additional feedback would be appreciated.

Regards,
Nick
nsiti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2025, 10:54 AM   #12
LockDoc
The Older Generation


 
LockDoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Montezuma, Iowa
Posts: 26,741
Re: 1972 Suburban 4X4 3/4 Ton K20 "The Beast"

Quote:
Originally Posted by nsiti View Post
Hi, thanks for sharing.

I've given some thought as to how to account for the weight of a larger gas tank. It's heavier than stock (maybe 50 lbs?), plus 20 gallons additional max capacity (124 lbs), so that's about 175 lbs extra weight when full. That's the equivalent of an average person's weight. These heavy duty springs probably wouldn't sag much with an extra 175 lbs of weight, but something to consider in the design.

I also looked at the full range of vehicle weights in the link you provided and compared them to the figures you posted, which raises some concern as to accuracy for the 1972 3/4 ton 4x4. Notice that the weight difference of the doors (4,141 lbs) vs gate (4,585) figures you posted is 444 lbs, while in all other instances the differences are near zero. Any idea why that might be? I would guess it's a typo.

To cross reference, I looked at the official Chevy Suburban 1972 spec sheet and read that the curb weight is 4,857 for the 8-cylinder K20 variant (with a fairly even 2,374 lb / 2,483 lb front / rear split).

All this analysis made me think, what are we trying to measure when designing for the weight load capacity of rear leaf springs? They are not going to support the entire rear weight of the truck, but rather the frame and body weight, excluding the axle, wheels and tires, right?

Any additional feedback would be appreciated.

Regards,
Nick


I didn't read the whole chart but yes, that weight difference is suspicious. Like you suggested it may just be a typo.

I can't offer much else because the '69 Suburban I built didn't need any adjustments and my '67 Panel Truck already had drop springs under it when I bought it.
__________________
Leon

Locksmith, Specializing In Antique Trucks, Automobiles, & Motorcycles

(My Dually Pickup Project Thread)

http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=829820

-

Last edited by LockDoc; 12-02-2025 at 11:01 AM.
LockDoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2025, 09:09 PM   #13
HO455
Registered User
 
HO455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 12,405
Re: 1972 Suburban 4X4 3/4 Ton K20 "The Beast"

Q10I'll add that my 2wd, 1/2 ton, SBC, Burban weights 4780 with my 200 lbs and about 1/2 tank of gas and no second row seat installed.

It's great to see you're making progress! Keep up the good work!
Attached Images
 
__________________
Thanks to Bob and Jeanie and everyone else at Superior Performance for all their great help.
RIP Bob Parks.
1967 Burban (the WMB),1988 S10 Blazer (the Stink10 II),1969 GTO (the Goat), 1970 Javelin, 1952 F2 Ford OHC six 4X4, 29 Model A, 72 Firebird (the DBP Bird). 85 Alfa Romeo
If it breaks I didn't want it in the first place
The WMB repair thread http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=698377
HO455 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2025, 04:40 PM   #14
nsiti
Active Member
 
Join Date: May 2022
Location: NY,NY
Posts: 108
Re: 1972 Suburban 4X4 3/4 Ton K20 "The Beast"

I was informed by ORD that they will provide a spring to hold 1050# at a 6 to 6.5” loaded arch measured from the spring perch up. I'm not sure what to make of this and have call into them but the owner is away for the week, so I thought I would ask for some feedback from all of you. Thanks!
nsiti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2025, 10:31 PM   #15
LockDoc
The Older Generation


 
LockDoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Montezuma, Iowa
Posts: 26,741
Re: 1972 Suburban 4X4 3/4 Ton K20 "The Beast"

Quote:
Originally Posted by nsiti View Post
I was informed by ORD that they will provide a spring to hold 1050# at a 6 to 6.5” loaded arch measured from the spring perch up. I'm not sure what to make of this and have call into them but the owner is away for the week, so I thought I would ask for some feedback from all of you. Thanks!

I hope someone else can give some insight on that. I am lost on that one....
__________________
Leon

Locksmith, Specializing In Antique Trucks, Automobiles, & Motorcycles

(My Dually Pickup Project Thread)

http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=829820

-
LockDoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2025 67-72chevytrucks.com