The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-06-2004, 04:30 PM   #1
primerib
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Ft.Worth, TX
Posts: 35
Rear end swap?

My truck is a daily driver. It has a 250 and a 4.11 rear end. The mileage is pretty lousy (about 13 mpg). I'm looking at accepting a job that would require me to drive 230 miles of highway a couple of times a week. The old girl is wound-up awful tight at anything above 50 mph, and this stretch of road is a 70mph zone.

If i were to swap to a better ratio (like a 3.08) would my mileage be significantly better or would it not make much difference.

Thanks
__________________
72 Stepside
250 w/ 3 on the column
DFW area
primerib is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2004, 04:35 PM   #2
Longhorn Man
its all about the +6 inches
 
Longhorn Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hilliard Ohio
Posts: 2,690
A 3.07 gear would make it much more bearable on the road...like 2500 RPM at 60 MPH (or close to that) but IMO. you'll be lucky to do much better...maybe one or two MPG.
Longhorn Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2004, 04:38 PM   #3
dennis111
Registered User
 
dennis111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Amish Wonderland of Central PA.
Posts: 31
Mileage would improve but one thing you must consider is that you will have increased wear on your clutch. With a 3:08 ratio, it will take alot more rpm and clutch slippage in order to get rolling from a standing start. You could almost forget about starting on a hill.

A 3:42 ratio would be far more friendly.
__________________
Dennis

68 GMC SWB Custom 1/2 ton, 2WD, 350 V8, PS, PB, 3-Speed, 3:08 12 bolt rear, tilt, tach, vac, cruise and more. . . .

Last edited by dennis111; 08-06-2004 at 07:20 PM.
dennis111 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2004, 05:24 PM   #4
stelth2002
Young Gun wth Fast Inline
 
stelth2002's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Idaho
Posts: 1,475
If he has a 4 gear granny i dont think he will have any problems with a 3.08 rear. I mean it will be sorta powerless at the top, but what does one expect. I would be surprised if your mileage improves at all, your pushing a small stock inline pretty hard at 70mph which is definatly doable.
__________________
1967 Chevrolet LWB with built 292! 415 ft. lbs of torque, 4 speed :O with 27% overdrive too, 3.73 Posi. Frame and body done... getting painted!!!
stelth2002 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2004, 05:47 PM   #5
dennis111
Registered User
 
dennis111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Amish Wonderland of Central PA.
Posts: 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by stelth2002
If he has a 4 gear granny i dont think he will have any problems with a 3.08 rear.
His sig shows he has 3 on the tree which is what I based my experience on.
__________________
Dennis

68 GMC SWB Custom 1/2 ton, 2WD, 350 V8, PS, PB, 3-Speed, 3:08 12 bolt rear, tilt, tach, vac, cruise and more. . . .
dennis111 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2004, 06:17 PM   #6
Inspector722
Fixing my 67, & loving it
 
Inspector722's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bridge City, Texas
Posts: 524
I am puting a 350 trubo on my 250.It has a 3.73 posi in it now. Would a 3.08 be to much for it?
Inspector722 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2004, 07:18 PM   #7
dennis111
Registered User
 
dennis111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Amish Wonderland of Central PA.
Posts: 31
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inspector722
I am puting a 350 trubo on my 250.It has a 3.73 posi in it now. Would a 3.08 be to much for it?
I doubt if you would have too much trouble running a 3.08 with this combo because the torque converter will do all the work from a standing start.

You might miss the bottom end spunk though. I don't think I would do it if most of my driving was in town. If you are building a highway cruiser, I'd go for it.
__________________
Dennis

68 GMC SWB Custom 1/2 ton, 2WD, 350 V8, PS, PB, 3-Speed, 3:08 12 bolt rear, tilt, tach, vac, cruise and more. . . .
dennis111 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2004, 07:37 PM   #8
Tx Firefighter
Watch out for your cornhole !
 
Tx Firefighter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Azle, Texas
Posts: 14,162
I'd do it. I believe the relief of going from a 4:11 to a 3:07 will be very profound. It will drive like a different truck.

A 6 cylinder has inherent torque over a V8 anyway. I bet if you said you had a 283 V8, no one would say a thing bad about the swap. The 250 is not that much smaller, but it's an inline and they are torquier.

I think you'll be pleasantly surprised.

The Tx Firefighter Super Secret Project (TM) that's going to be debuted soon has a 250 inline 6 with a 2.73 rear gear.
__________________
I'm on the Instagram- @Gearhead_Kevin
Tx Firefighter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2004, 07:45 PM   #9
Inspector722
Fixing my 67, & loving it
 
Inspector722's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bridge City, Texas
Posts: 524
There needs to be a Firefighter group here too.
Inspector722 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com