The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1960 - 1966 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-10-2004, 02:51 AM   #1
BK
BK Built
 
BK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Oroville, WA
Posts: 478
low 60-66 trucks

ok, so ive been on this forum for a short while(few months) and i love it. But i cruise the 67-72 and 73-87 boards alot, and alot of the low trucks i see, are those, i hardly see any low 60-66's. Im currently making my chopped panel lay frame, if not rocker, here in the next few weeks, and i would like to see more of our trucks low. also, if your laying rocker or door or frame, please post pics of front and rear suspension setups. thanks.
BK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2004, 03:27 AM   #2
Slammed66
Needs a Big Block
 
Slammed66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Red Deer , Alberta
Posts: 1,198
getting there , Id like this to be ride height , its layed out here, IM z'ing the frame and installing a 4 link I think Im not certain on that to use on the rear yet, should have the front done by mid january. lets see some progress pics on that killer panel
__________________
1964 Short box
On dropmembers and billets
1962 Suburban family cruiser
1972 K10
Slammed66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2004, 05:43 PM   #3
zenish
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: stallings,nc
Posts: 401
the top of the front fender gets in the way.
__________________
1964 c10 short step
1962 econoline van
1989 rs camaro
2006 yamaha vino 125
1975 goldwing
zenish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2004, 08:16 PM   #4
Piper71c10
Unending Project
 
Piper71c10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sequim, WA
Posts: 337
what's the lowest before that front fender binds up? I'm rebuilding a '72 front suspension that I hope to add 2.5" spindles and 3" springs. Should I be thinking about clearance?

Piper
Piper71c10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2004, 02:49 AM   #5
Slammed66
Needs a Big Block
 
Slammed66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Red Deer , Alberta
Posts: 1,198
Piper gpp ahead you'll have plent of clearance with that set up , just watch those lower control arms
__________________
1964 Short box
On dropmembers and billets
1962 Suburban family cruiser
1972 K10
Slammed66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2004, 04:31 AM   #6
BK
BK Built
 
BK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Oroville, WA
Posts: 478
Well, i did it. its a 4" z, and im using 1/4 cause they had no 3/16 available until a week later, so i said why not. so ive got the rear sides all welded up, just need to cap it off. As you can see i boxed the inside, give me a little more strength. I will hopefully do the front in the next day or 2, depends on if i go snowboarding tomorrow. So to make everything easier, i did move the engine ahead 3", so i shouldnt have dist. clearance problems, and if you can see in the last pic, looking through the big hole in my firewall(which im almost done shaving) you can see my ECE auto tranny crossmember, simply flipped upside down, works perfectly. Also, you may notice in one pic my new firebird tilt steering column. Enjoy, ill get more pics soon.
Attached Images
     
BK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2005, 11:02 PM   #7
BK
BK Built
 
BK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Oroville, WA
Posts: 478
Well, i hope you all enjoy the pics, i know i sure do!!! I got the 3" spindles on, got 205/75/15 tires on it, have the engine and tranny in it, recessed the bumper 1/2", flipped my ECE tranny crossmember over and dropped the center 1&1/4" to match the 4" Z and so have room for exhaust, got the TA x-member in, got it all ground and painted, cut a good sized hole in the core support for my steering box, and so its all good. Got my box tubing for the rear so i should get that going. Enjoy!
Attached Images
     
BK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2005, 01:36 AM   #8
scottyd
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: waco tx
Posts: 113
coool

great job, we think a lot alike!! i z'd mine 4 1/2" im thinking about cutting off the rockers and sectioning the body 2" (so itll be lower than the 63 that I.F. built )
Attached Images
  
__________________
1962 chevy shortwide,bagged, notched and Zed frame,top chopped 3 1/2", sectioned 2" tubbed (31x18.5 mickey Ts),shaved,currently 51"s from ground to roof top!
scottyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2005, 03:27 AM   #9
Slammed66
Needs a Big Block
 
Slammed66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Red Deer , Alberta
Posts: 1,198
you guys SUCK , this is junk , here I thought Id have er licked BUT NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO I've gotta z the bloddy frame now THANKS
__________________
1964 Short box
On dropmembers and billets
1962 Suburban family cruiser
1972 K10
Slammed66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2005, 05:07 AM   #10
BK
BK Built
 
BK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Oroville, WA
Posts: 478
ScottyD - That looks very very clean, looks like youll be lower if you do what your wanting... and faster(nice rear setup )

Slammed66 - HHAHAHAHAHAHAHA yeah.. you better z it... everybodys doin it... lol

Oh yeah, ill have some pics of my 10" notch up, its lookin pretty good, just got my bag mounts in, works pretty good.
BK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2005, 11:24 AM   #11
Slammed66
Needs a Big Block
 
Slammed66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Red Deer , Alberta
Posts: 1,198
Bastards, thats more work for that last inch and a half. whats ever might as well do it while its apart, c'mon right now its a friggin monster truck!
__________________
1964 Short box
On dropmembers and billets
1962 Suburban family cruiser
1972 K10
Slammed66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2005, 11:50 AM   #12
Woogeroo
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: tool box
Posts: 3,115
Talking

You guys crack me up.

cool rides.

Slammed66, I got yer monster truck right here:





-W
Woogeroo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2005, 01:44 PM   #13
scottyd
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: waco tx
Posts: 113
[QUOTE=Slammed66]Bastards, thats more work for that last inch and a half. whats ever might as well do it while its apart, c'mon right now its a friggin monster truck!

nah man it looks good!! but you know youll never be happy till at least the rockers are on the ground have you considered the top? heres mine before i went nuts on it.
Attached Images
 
__________________
1962 chevy shortwide,bagged, notched and Zed frame,top chopped 3 1/2", sectioned 2" tubbed (31x18.5 mickey Ts),shaved,currently 51"s from ground to roof top!
scottyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2005, 01:51 PM   #14
scottyd
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: waco tx
Posts: 113
and heres what i want it to look like....... someday i did this hack job in photo shop i brought the front end some to make the front tire look cleaner, dropped it(notice how short my sons legs are ), sectioned it, and put the glass in (cause the tops already done) it should look like a mini when its done!
Attached Images
 
__________________
1962 chevy shortwide,bagged, notched and Zed frame,top chopped 3 1/2", sectioned 2" tubbed (31x18.5 mickey Ts),shaved,currently 51"s from ground to roof top!

Last edited by scottyd; 01-13-2005 at 01:54 PM.
scottyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2005, 03:40 PM   #15
BK
BK Built
 
BK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Oroville, WA
Posts: 478
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottyd
great job, we think a lot alike!! i z'd mine 4 1/2" im thinking about cutting off the rockers and sectioning the body 2" (so itll be lower than the 63 that I.F. built )
yeah, i would like to be lower too, especially seeings that im a panel. they say they have a 3-4" chop, and cut the rockers off, so if i cut my rockers off, i would be about 2" lower than them, but im not gonna section the ole body... thatd be tough
BK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2005, 08:55 PM   #16
scottyd
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: waco tx
Posts: 113
yeah youd have a little more to section than me on that panel you should cut it to the doors (but i noticed you had new rockers lol)...im gonna do it.....those cats at I.F. claim to build the lowest rides....we'll show em
__________________
1962 chevy shortwide,bagged, notched and Zed frame,top chopped 3 1/2", sectioned 2" tubbed (31x18.5 mickey Ts),shaved,currently 51"s from ground to roof top!
scottyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2005, 10:23 PM   #17
Slammed66
Needs a Big Block
 
Slammed66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Red Deer , Alberta
Posts: 1,198
Ill probably leave the top on this one Icve got some twisted ideas breweing , I have a cab I chopped 4 inches, and I have a Looooooooooooooooooooong box frame with a 9 foot step side box on ie , now if I put them together and built a reallllllly looooooooong and layed out truck it would be sick!!!!!
__________________
1964 Short box
On dropmembers and billets
1962 Suburban family cruiser
1972 K10
Slammed66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2005, 01:38 AM   #18
KSever
Registered User
 
KSever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Dodgeville, Wisconsin
Posts: 22
Quote:
Originally Posted by DroppedChoppedPanel
Well, i did it. its a 4" z, and im using 1/4 cause they had no 3/16 available until a week later, so i said why not. so ive got the rear sides all welded up, just need to cap it off. As you can see i boxed the inside, give me a little more strength. I will hopefully do the front in the next day or 2, depends on if i go snowboarding tomorrow. So to make everything easier, i did move the engine ahead 3", so i shouldnt have dist. clearance problems, and if you can see in the last pic, looking through the big hole in my firewall(which im almost done shaving) you can see my ECE auto tranny crossmember, simply flipped upside down, works perfectly. Also, you may notice in one pic my new firebird tilt steering column. Enjoy, ill get more pics soon.
Seems to me it would be wise to wait the extra week and go with the 3/16" for stability, then you shouldn't get that twist in the frame or a crack when you hit a large hole in the road. That little added safety is worth the one week wait.
KSever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2005, 06:14 AM   #19
BK
BK Built
 
BK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Oroville, WA
Posts: 478
Quote:
Originally Posted by KSever
Seems to me it would be wise to wait the extra week and go with the 3/16" for stability, then you shouldn't get that twist in the frame or a crack when you hit a large hole in the road. That little added safety is worth the one week wait.
Just wondering why you say 3/16" is stronger than 1/4"?
BK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2005, 12:32 PM   #20
KSever
Registered User
 
KSever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Dodgeville, Wisconsin
Posts: 22
Quote:
Originally Posted by DroppedChoppedPanel
Just wondering why you say 3/16" is stronger than 1/4"?

I don't know what I was thinking when I responded to that, I think I was thinking you said 3/8". Sorry for the misquote, but it sure is looking good. Someday I'll be that low with my 63 C-10.
KSever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2005, 06:28 PM   #21
zenish
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: stallings,nc
Posts: 401
i saw a magazine article where they notched the front crossmember 1.5 or 2 inches and boxed it in.mines dropped 3.5",but i keep dragging my lower control arms.does anyone know where a can get lower control arms that are the same height as the crossmember?
__________________
1964 c10 short step
1962 econoline van
1989 rs camaro
2006 yamaha vino 125
1975 goldwing
zenish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2005, 10:08 PM   #22
scottyd
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: waco tx
Posts: 113
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slammed66
Ill probably leave the top on this one Icve got some twisted ideas breweing , I have a cab I chopped 4 inches, and I have a Looooooooooooooooooooong box frame with a 9 foot step side box on ie , now if I put them together and built a reallllllly looooooooong and layed out truck it would be sick!!!!!
Looooong and looooow now theres a killer combo!!
__________________
1962 chevy shortwide,bagged, notched and Zed frame,top chopped 3 1/2", sectioned 2" tubbed (31x18.5 mickey Ts),shaved,currently 51"s from ground to roof top!
scottyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2005, 05:08 AM   #23
BK
BK Built
 
BK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Oroville, WA
Posts: 478
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottyd
Looooong and looooow now theres a killer combo!!
yeah, thats what im goin for, even though im not as long as a long bed, chopped, and being a panel makes it look long...
BK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2005, 04:54 PM   #24
Panelrodder
Registered User
 
Panelrodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Logan, Utah
Posts: 57
Piper 71C10 the drop that you are using on the front end is about what I'm going with but what are you running the back? I was thinking 5 or 6. Would that put me even or with a reversed rake?
Panelrodder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2005, 11:39 PM   #25
BK
BK Built
 
BK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Oroville, WA
Posts: 478
some new pics, it sits lower though, it lays full rocker as the tranny tunnel was on the tranny... hope you like em




Last edited by BK; 02-28-2005 at 12:59 AM. Reason: pics showing up on post
BK is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com