The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1960 - 1966 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-23-2004, 03:25 PM   #1
chevy283
Registered User
 
chevy283's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: wilson oklahoma
Posts: 367
trans swap

a have a 1965 c10 283' a it has a stock manuel 3 speed i was wondering if a th350 auto would give me better mpg i have a 3.73 rear in it
chevy283 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2004, 04:05 PM   #2
60-66 Nut
Professional Beer Tester
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 453
Not likely, since the high gear in the 350 is 1:1 just like the 3spd, plus the convertor slippage could make it worse. You'd probably have to go to an overdrive to really help. A 700R4 would be just as easy to install as the TH350, you just need to run a hot wire for the lockup. Hope that helps.

60-66 Nut
__________________
60 Ford F100 Custom Cab
61 Apache Short Fleetside
64 C10 Short Stepside
65 C80 409 V8 5spd(X-Firetruck)
83 GMC 350 Olds Diesel
85 GMC Short Bed
86 GMC Short Bed
90 GMC R3500 Crew Cab
92 GMC 1500
60-66 Nut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2004, 10:25 PM   #3
zenish
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: stallings,nc
Posts: 401
the manual will give better mileage.you should change your rear gear,get a t5,get a three speed with overdrive if you can find one,or change to an overdrive automatic.
__________________
1964 c10 short step
1962 econoline van
1989 rs camaro
2006 yamaha vino 125
1975 goldwing
zenish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2004, 07:04 PM   #4
chevy283
Registered User
 
chevy283's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: wilson oklahoma
Posts: 367
700r4 would give better mpg would a t5
chevy283 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2004, 07:09 PM   #5
chevy283
Registered User
 
chevy283's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: wilson oklahoma
Posts: 367
there is a 1988 od 700re for sale for $250 is that a good price
chevy283 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2004, 08:17 PM   #6
60-66 Nut
Professional Beer Tester
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 453
A T5 would do OK also, but I think the 700 would be an easier install. Maybe someone who has done the T5 swap could tell you for sure. If that 700 is in good condition, that's a very good price, at least around here anyway. The 83-84 700's are not supposed to be quite as tough as the later ones, or so I have read.

60-66 Nut
__________________
60 Ford F100 Custom Cab
61 Apache Short Fleetside
64 C10 Short Stepside
65 C80 409 V8 5spd(X-Firetruck)
83 GMC 350 Olds Diesel
85 GMC Short Bed
86 GMC Short Bed
90 GMC R3500 Crew Cab
92 GMC 1500
60-66 Nut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2005, 09:07 AM   #7
Ed Cardinal
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 8
The 3.73 rear was the most comon in these trucks but I do not think you can just switch out the gears in that rear unless you plan on going the other way and making them steeper like a 4.11 rear or something. Otherwise I believe the pumpkin will not fit the milder gears in it. You would have to get another rear to do it. And then you would probably want to go around a 3.36 or 3.08 otherwise you will sacrifice too much power / torque.
Remember the 283 is a very high reving motor and will tolerate the steeper gears much better. Also if you are running a stock 2-barrel carb you will want to change it out for a small 4 barrel with vacuum secondaries. If you pick the right carb and set it up right it will give you better mpg and more power when you need it. Just don't STOMP on it all the time or it will defeat the purpose. And a 3.73 is actually a good configuration for that truck. I would probably just drop in a 700R4 trans if you want it to purrrr on the HWY in overdrive and give you better mpg. That would be the easiest swap..........Ed.
Ed Cardinal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2005, 01:27 PM   #8
chevy283
Registered User
 
chevy283's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: wilson oklahoma
Posts: 367
so i should replace the cab with a 4 barrel and trans with a 700r4 and i should get 17mgp?
chevy283 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2005, 08:29 PM   #9
zenish
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: stallings,nc
Posts: 401
a quadrajet four barrel will get better mileage than an aftermarket carb.
__________________
1964 c10 short step
1962 econoline van
1989 rs camaro
2006 yamaha vino 125
1975 goldwing
zenish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2005, 08:01 PM   #10
Ed Cardinal
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 8
MPG ques

I would probably swap out the carb first and see how that works. The quadrajet is a great carb and would work nicely if you get the smaller CFM one. Edelbrock makes new versions of them for a decent price. If they are set-up right and not over jetted they are truly the best for these trucks.
And if you can't find a stock manifold you can go with an Edlebrock performer (not the RPM model). Even if you have to paint it to make it look more stock. Then after all that see how it goes. Unless you are doing a lot of long trips that set-up should be fine. And if you decide to sell the old auto trans let me know..........Ed.
Ed Cardinal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2005, 10:36 PM   #11
chevy283
Registered User
 
chevy283's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: wilson oklahoma
Posts: 367
i don't have a auto its a manuel 3 on the tree
chevy283 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2005, 11:38 PM   #12
qksilver
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Southern Pines NC
Posts: 3,853
a 200 overdrive would mean not having to cut the drive shaft and the trans yoke might even be the same. Plus they have better gearing for a smaller motor and don't use as much power either. You would still have to reposition the crossmember, add TV linkage and shift linkage
qksilver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2005, 11:55 PM   #13
chevy283
Registered User
 
chevy283's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: wilson oklahoma
Posts: 367
200r4? im new
chevy283 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2005, 09:58 PM   #14
chevy283
Registered User
 
chevy283's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: wilson oklahoma
Posts: 367
is the 200 overdrive from a chevy?
chevy283 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2005, 10:02 PM   #15
zenish
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: stallings,nc
Posts: 401
some 200r4s only fit buicks,olds, and pontiacs.some are also drilled for chevs.
__________________
1964 c10 short step
1962 econoline van
1989 rs camaro
2006 yamaha vino 125
1975 goldwing
zenish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2005, 10:04 PM   #16
Blue Beard
Registered User
 
Blue Beard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Washington State
Posts: 8,834
Does the Trans mount have to be changed as well?
__________________
1970 Chev CST
2003 Harley Fatboy
1975 Chevrolet Step Van
1956 Chev Bel Air
1977 Blazer 2WD For Sale $3000.00
1978 Blazer 2WD For Sale $7000.00
1978 Silverado
2005 Monte Carlo
Blue Beard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2005, 10:59 PM   #17
chevy283
Registered User
 
chevy283's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: wilson oklahoma
Posts: 367
so it would be easer to just go with the 700r4
chevy283 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com