Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
01-05-2005, 12:34 AM | #1 |
Custer had a plan too.
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: No. California
Posts: 344
|
Crazy or Should I Switch my 72 lwb 4x4 for an 85 swb 4x4?
Any thoughts on why I should/shouldn't switch from my 72 lwb GMC 4x4 to an 85 swb GMC 4x4?
85: air, good paint and body, interior nice, NO RUST!, stock, 127K miles, two tanks. Better than single digit mpg (I hope). 72: Fewer on the road, poster child for smog controls, poor brakes if you've been following my posts, moderate cab rust per California standards (mint back east I hear), needs body work/paint to make presentable. Gots 69-72 tow hooks and soon to have a tach dash. Anybody know of any major gremlins in 85 trucks? Financially, I think I could get around $3k for the 72. I would need that plus $1.5k to cover the 85. I think I would be $ ahead in 12 months though at the rate I'm putting $ into the 72. Am I nuts or should I?
__________________
72 K15 GMC (aka Big White) Performance Rockers, Cab Corners, and Floors Fossil Fuel Glutton Neighborhood Nuisance 98 BMW 540i for Speed (Sold ) 05 Subaru Outback for mileage |
01-05-2005, 12:49 AM | #2 |
its all about the +6 inches
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hilliard Ohio
Posts: 2,690
|
Personally, I'd never even consider it.
|
01-05-2005, 12:53 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Colfax-California
Posts: 8,650
|
Yeah, I think your crazy. I wouln't consider it either.
|
01-05-2005, 02:18 AM | #4 |
Got Light Emitting Diode?
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Newberg, OR
Posts: 2,485
|
i agree with above. here in portland, i would have to deal with DEQ, and thats no fun with a truck, unless its brand new
__________________
1968 1/2 ton 2wd lwb 6 lug disc and bags up front. Next c notch and rear bags '02 Chevy Silverado LT ext cab short bed 2WD 5/7 drop on 22's(the family car) 1993 Cherokee work ride/weekend wheeler |
01-05-2005, 02:21 AM | #5 |
Embrace the Redneck
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Cabot, AR
Posts: 1,334
|
consider? what's to consider? um a trade a 72 for a 85. unless he's giving you money in the deal there shouldn't be any considering.
nuff said. sswj
__________________
'01 Camaro Son, you just can't get there from here... |
01-05-2005, 03:05 AM | #6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: "Under Montana skies."
Posts: 1,836
|
Didn't you notice the difference between the swelte, stylish lines of your 72 and the fat, boxey lines of that 85?
__________________
'71 GMC K20 Suburban, '71 GMC K10 Suburban, '72 Chevy C10 CST Suburban, '72 Chevy K20 clunker pickup. |
01-05-2005, 03:52 AM | #7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: san marcos,tx
Posts: 266
|
67-72's just look better
__________________
72 GMC sierra 3/4 ton 402 bb 68 GMC 3/4 ton 2010 camaro rs: daily driver |
01-05-2005, 05:45 AM | #8 |
its all about the +6 inches
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hilliard Ohio
Posts: 2,690
|
besides, if you get a 73 - 87, you'll be nothing but an average joe. Those things are as common as parking lot gravel.
Besides, if you get T-boned by a citation with a park inducer in front to simulate a light bulb being on and shattering... |
01-05-2005, 08:58 AM | #9 |
Special Order
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mt Airy, MD
Posts: 85,851
|
Put the $1500 into your`72.Did anyone mention Chicks dig them?Don`t let the rust bother you.It`s slow to grow in CA and won`t come back in a hurry either,if you do fix it.And,if you do,you`ll have a bichin`truck.`85`s are no spring chickens.They are lookin`classy these days,being a couple of styles back now.They are built basically the same as our earlier trucks and they are the last chance to get a good ol`4wd IMO.Giving up the better looks of the `72.You gotta admit,they nailed it with the 67-72 body design.Looks aren`t everything and if you need to make a practicle decision and what you are considering seems practicle(I know,it`s a sad day),then go for it.You crazy s.o.b.
__________________
"BUILDING A BETTER WAY TO SERVE THE USA"......67/72......"The New Breed" GMC '67 C1500 Wideside Super Custom SWB: 327/M22/3.42 posi.........."The '67" (project) GMC '72 K2500 Wideside Sierra Custom Camper: 350/TH350/4.10 Power-Lok..."The '72" (rolling) Tim "Don't call me a redneck. I'm a rough cut country gentleman" R.I.P. ~ East Side Low Life ~ El Jay ~ 72BLUZ ~ Fasteddie69 ~ Ron586 ~ 67ChevyRedneck ~ Grumpy Old Man ~ |
01-05-2005, 09:13 AM | #10 |
Hittin E-Z Street on Mud Tires
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 23,090
|
The only benifit I could see would be that the '85 most likely has OD, I think GM started adding to every vehicle around '83. I hear fuel is really expensive in cali...it's currently 1.54/gal here. Personally, I'd keep the GMC. Not nearly as many GMC's around as Chevys, especially 4X4! There is also a lot of smog crap that can break and a lot of extra crap under the hood on the '85. I think you know what to do
__________________
Jesse James 1967 C10 SWB Stepside: 350/700R4/3.73 1965 Ford Mustang: 289/T5-5spd/3.25 Trac-Loc 1968 Pontiac Firebird: Project Fire Chicken! 2015 Silverado Double Cab 5.3L Z71 2001 Jeep Wrangler Sport 4.0L 5spd 2020 Chevrolet Equinox Premium 2.0L Turbo 2011 Mustang V6 ~ Wife's ride American Born, Country by the Grace of God 1967 CST Shop Truck Rebuild! My 1967 C-10 Build Thread My Vintage Air A/C Install Project "On a Dime" Trying my hand at Home Renovation! 1965 Mustang Modifications! |
01-05-2005, 09:51 AM | #11 |
20' Daredevil (Ret)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Jefferson State
Posts: 13,728
|
IMO, 73-87s have no charm, no character, nothing to make them lovable, while the 67-72s ooze personality. Remember, an '85 is still an old truck and will require maintenance and repairs - and will have more complexity and be harder to work on - not to mention the smog equipment.
Keep the '72, fix the brakes, you'll be much happier. If you can't fix it, sell it and buy a better 67-72. $.02
__________________
- Mike - 1972 K20 LWB 350/350/205 RIP El Jay |
01-05-2005, 11:47 AM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Westminster, CO
Posts: 3,071
|
Consider it???? NEVER!!!!
__________________
Alex 1971 Lil' Red 350 SBC 700R4 |
01-05-2005, 11:58 AM | #13 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: East Central, MO
Posts: 11,336
|
Well you will end up working on both............... so............ the older truck is easier and cheaper to work on.
|
01-05-2005, 01:57 PM | #14 |
Custer had a plan too.
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: No. California
Posts: 344
|
Hmm, there seems to be a slant to the responses...
I was thinking you guys on the 67-72 Board could be impartial. I guess I was wrong.
__________________
72 K15 GMC (aka Big White) Performance Rockers, Cab Corners, and Floors Fossil Fuel Glutton Neighborhood Nuisance 98 BMW 540i for Speed (Sold ) 05 Subaru Outback for mileage |
01-05-2005, 02:28 PM | #15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Westminster, CO
Posts: 3,071
|
Impartial, is not the issue. What you are asking the 67-72 guys is like asking a guy who absolutely LOVES a pastrami sandwich to trade it for a peanut butter and AVERAGE jelly sandwich....gosh I must be hungry LOL!!!!
__________________
Alex 1971 Lil' Red 350 SBC 700R4 |
01-05-2005, 02:42 PM | #16 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Saskatoon,SK,Canada
Posts: 2,476
|
Don't do it.
__________________
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan Canada |
01-05-2005, 03:05 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 1,492
|
I have several 71-72s and an 85 so I can understand what everybody else is saying. I agree that they will both need work...don't forget that even an 85 is now 20 years old.
I would imagine that drivetrain is much heavier duty in your 72? NP205 transfer case vs some cheapy in the 1/2 ton 85. I'm sure the rest of the drivetrain in the 85 doesn't stack up either. My 85 has a hydraulic clutch which is a piece of crapola. I like both models but the 72 has more character. I am starting to get more attention everyday with my 85 since it is a clean rust free truck. They are about gone around here. |
01-05-2005, 08:54 PM | #18 |
Special Order
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mt Airy, MD
Posts: 85,851
|
Try asking your question on the the 73-87 board.See what happens.
__________________
"BUILDING A BETTER WAY TO SERVE THE USA"......67/72......"The New Breed" GMC '67 C1500 Wideside Super Custom SWB: 327/M22/3.42 posi.........."The '67" (project) GMC '72 K2500 Wideside Sierra Custom Camper: 350/TH350/4.10 Power-Lok..."The '72" (rolling) Tim "Don't call me a redneck. I'm a rough cut country gentleman" R.I.P. ~ East Side Low Life ~ El Jay ~ 72BLUZ ~ Fasteddie69 ~ Ron586 ~ 67ChevyRedneck ~ Grumpy Old Man ~ |
01-05-2005, 09:07 PM | #19 |
Account Suspended
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Virginia Beach, Va. U.S.A.
Posts: 15,320
|
Hmmmm, would you trade Metallica for some disco?
|
01-05-2005, 09:28 PM | #20 |
Not a bad nut after all..
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: ND
Posts: 1,759
|
As Dean mentioned, the '85 has a NP208 transfer case (chain drive aluminum case). It is fine, but the NP205 in your '72 is better. The '85 has a 10-bolt rear end. Again functional, but the 12-bolt in your '72 is better. The '85 probably had a smog equiped 305 engine originally. Functional, but your '72 had better. See the pattern?
The '85 is a nice truck, but I wouldn't trade if I were you. |
01-05-2005, 09:53 PM | #21 |
Custer had a plan too.
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: No. California
Posts: 344
|
Ok, Ok!
First of all there is no need to be rude and ask if I would trade for some disco. That is just wrong. I have sobered up and passed on the 85 idea. I was temporarily seduced by the rust free, air conditioned, straight body paneled, dark side. I have let go of my hate, Obi Wan. Warts and all, I will stick with the 72. Thanks guys.
__________________
72 K15 GMC (aka Big White) Performance Rockers, Cab Corners, and Floors Fossil Fuel Glutton Neighborhood Nuisance 98 BMW 540i for Speed (Sold ) 05 Subaru Outback for mileage Last edited by avejoe; 01-05-2005 at 10:13 PM. |
01-05-2005, 10:05 PM | #22 | |
Account Suspended
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Virginia Beach, Va. U.S.A.
Posts: 15,320
|
Quote:
|
|
01-05-2005, 10:06 PM | #23 |
Special Order
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mt Airy, MD
Posts: 85,851
|
Hey Randy,I didn`t take you for an ol`Disco Duck.I figured you`d have all that southern-rock that was thrivin`at the same time.Good luck gettin`rid of that!!See me smilin`?
__________________
"BUILDING A BETTER WAY TO SERVE THE USA"......67/72......"The New Breed" GMC '67 C1500 Wideside Super Custom SWB: 327/M22/3.42 posi.........."The '67" (project) GMC '72 K2500 Wideside Sierra Custom Camper: 350/TH350/4.10 Power-Lok..."The '72" (rolling) Tim "Don't call me a redneck. I'm a rough cut country gentleman" R.I.P. ~ East Side Low Life ~ El Jay ~ 72BLUZ ~ Fasteddie69 ~ Ron586 ~ 67ChevyRedneck ~ Grumpy Old Man ~ |
01-05-2005, 11:28 PM | #24 |
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Eastern - Manitoba Canada, Winnipeg
Posts: 4,369
|
In 12 month that 72 is still gonna be worth more in parts than the 85 typically.
__________________
Senior active founding member. 70 3/4 ton GMC Suburban 4x4 250/4 spd. 71 1/2 ton Suburban Chevy 4x4, 350/350 72 Chev 1 ton tow truck 402BB w/Holmes 440 wrecker on propane 2005 FLSTSCI Harley Springer 85 FXSB Harley Lowrider 72 Triumph 650 Bonneville 5spd "Poor people don't have hobbies" Quote from wife. |
01-06-2005, 12:46 AM | #25 | |
Account Suspended
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Virginia Beach, Va. U.S.A.
Posts: 15,320
|
Quote:
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|