temp gauge question - The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network

k5b · 02-14-2005, 08:10 PM

On my factory temp gauge the 1st line reads 100, the 2nd line is blank, and the 3rd line reads 210. What temp would the 2nd line be?

CbHeEaVsYt · 02-14-2005, 08:11 PM

my geuss would be 155 if its right in the middle

cb

k5b · 02-14-2005, 09:40 PM

Thats what I am thinking but my blazer hardly ever goes over the second line,so that means I am always running around 155? does that sound right?

SanitysBane · 02-14-2005, 10:08 PM

180 would be my guess

CbHeEaVsYt · 02-14-2005, 11:45 PM

y 180 155 is right between 100 210

cb

SanitysBane · 02-14-2005, 11:59 PM

just a thought

NeCrOmAnCeR · 02-15-2005, 11:37 PM

The factory guages were never very accurate. Though it would seem 155 is correct, you must take into consideration where the sender is before condeming the factory set-up.
If in the head, it is possible that the water in that location is not yet up to thermostat temp (water moves to the rear of the block, up to the heads along the way, and then to the front of the heads and out the intake. Unless it is a newer engine. ) so then 155 would be close. If however your sender is in the intake, the guage temperature should indicate the same temp as the opening temp of the thermostat. Then 180 would be more likely. And therefore the guage is incorrect.

Just a thought.

02-14-2005, 08:10 PM	#1
k5b Registered User Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Bushkill,PA Posts: 38	temp gauge question On my factory temp gauge the 1st line reads 100, the 2nd line is blank, and the 3rd line reads 210. What temp would the 2nd line be? __________________ 85 K5 Blazer

02-14-2005, 08:11 PM	#2
CbHeEaVsYt Pick up man Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: trenton mi Posts: 135	my geuss would be 155 if its right in the middle cb __________________ heres sum pics of my truck 82 silverado c10 heres my baby 1990 k1500 check out this 1957 chevrolet for sale

02-14-2005, 09:40 PM	#3
k5b Registered User Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Bushkill,PA Posts: 38	Thats what I am thinking but my blazer hardly ever goes over the second line,so that means I am always running around 155? does that sound right? __________________ 85 K5 Blazer

02-14-2005, 10:08 PM	#4
SanitysBane Registered User Join Date: May 2004 Location: Lubbock, Texas Posts: 2,121	180 would be my guess __________________ '96 Nissan Pathfinder '02 Firebird Trans Am. '88 K5 Blazer

02-14-2005, 11:45 PM	#5
CbHeEaVsYt Pick up man Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: trenton mi Posts: 135	y 180 155 is right between 100 210 cb __________________ heres sum pics of my truck 82 silverado c10 heres my baby 1990 k1500 check out this 1957 chevrolet for sale

02-14-2005, 11:59 PM	#6
SanitysBane Registered User Join Date: May 2004 Location: Lubbock, Texas Posts: 2,121	just a thought __________________ '96 Nissan Pathfinder '02 Firebird Trans Am. '88 K5 Blazer

02-15-2005, 11:37 PM	#7
NeCrOmAnCeR Registered User Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Hodgenville, Ky Posts: 735	The factory guages were never very accurate. Though it would seem 155 is correct, you must take into consideration where the sender is before condeming the factory set-up. If in the head, it is possible that the water in that location is not yet up to thermostat temp (water moves to the rear of the block, up to the heads along the way, and then to the front of the heads and out the intake. Unless it is a newer engine. ) so then 155 would be close. If however your sender is in the intake, the guage temperature should indicate the same temp as the opening temp of the thermostat. Then 180 would be more likely. And therefore the guage is incorrect. Just a thought.



Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.