The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-18-2005, 03:24 PM   #1
TP from Cntl PA
Registered User
 
TP from Cntl PA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Central PA....In the Berg of Nisbet
Posts: 790
Lightbulb Cummins going in '71, anyone here do it before?

I got a small straight 6 Cummins on the way to replace the 350 in my '71 C-20. It is a 6AT3.4 and about the size of a 292. I would have put a 5.9 in it but I was concerned about the length. Anyone here put a diesel(Besides a 6.2) in one of these trucks? My main concern is on the gearing. I have a load of Saginaw 3spds laying around and kicked around the idea of mounting one behind the original tranny backwards for a poor mans OD. I haven't looked inside one yet to see if it is possible, but I thought that would be sorta different and practical as well. I thought about mounting it like a devorced transfer case and then adding an aftermarket 3spd shifter in the cab to control it. In 3rd it would be like it wasn't there and you had stock driveline, then once out on the highway, put the second tranny up in second and match the main tranny up to the road speed and engine rpm.

Anyone ever try something like this?
__________________
'72 K-20 EFI'ed 250 Inline/4spd stake body, Farm Truck
'71 C-20 Cummins Diesel Powered, In storage thanks to $5.00 diesel!
'69 3500 GMC 305V-6/4spd, Still under reconstruction..........

Inlines Rule! 6 soldiers standing is better than 8 laying down!!!!!!!!
TP from Cntl PA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2005, 04:14 PM   #2
BET68
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BREVARD NC
Posts: 156
Cummins

SOUNDS GREAT ,WOULD LOVE TO DO THIS TO ONE OF MINE ! KEEP US POSTED!!!
__________________
NAMASTE

B&E

1971 LONGHORN C-30
1969 LONGHORN C-20
1968 DUALLY
1970 STEP SIDE PROJECT
1972 CST C-20
1980 M-80 MALIBU FOR SALE
1974 NOVA FOR SALE:
BET68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2005, 05:09 PM   #3
Chevy67Tk
Registered User
 
Chevy67Tk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 349
Cool idea, keep us informed. The only thing I would be worried about is you might be running helical cut gears backwards. I can’t remember what’s in a Saginaw it’s been a long time sence I had one apart.
__________________
Chevy67Tk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2005, 06:07 PM   #4
'71c204x4454
'71k204x4454
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Hood River Or.
Posts: 137
Someone is in the prossess right now. He just posted in the 4x4 forum.
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s....php3?t=141525
__________________
1971 K20 4x4
1964 buick skylark convertible
'71c204x4454 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2005, 06:51 PM   #5
hgs_notes
GEARHEAD
 
hgs_notes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: MN
Posts: 6,122
If you put both trannys in reverse, you would go forward!

HG
hgs_notes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2005, 07:40 PM   #6
tom hand
CCRider
 
tom hand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Olive Branch,MS,USA
Posts: 2,232
I don't understand the tranny thing...I really don't believe mounting a tranny backwards will buy you anything....it will have the same ratios if mounted forward. If you have the first tranny in first and the second tranny in second it would be the same as if you had the first one in second...the only thing two trannys would buy you is let you run a really high gear in the rearend....like a 2.73...and then you could put one tranny in first and the second in second for a really low gear for takeoffs....correct me if I am wrong
__________________
72 GMC Sierra SWB almost finished---- 84 Softail
Olive Branch MS
tom hand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2005, 07:44 PM   #7
dwaite72lnghrn
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: central pa
Posts: 1,525
The main problem is keeping the 3 speeds together long enough to get it on the road. Any diesel puts so much torque out at startup that the trans just can't hold together.
__________________
72 longhorn c30 502BB/th400/fact air/4.11rear/ custom camper
72 bug(the better half's) under reconstruction
2009 HHR aqua blue
71 GMC k20 350/sm465
2009 Chevy hd3500 6.6 Victory Red crew cab dually
Dave & Jeanne
dwaite72lnghrn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2005, 08:17 PM   #8
TP from Cntl PA
Registered User
 
TP from Cntl PA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Central PA....In the Berg of Nisbet
Posts: 790
Quote:
Originally Posted by tom hand
I don't understand the tranny thing...I really don't believe mounting a tranny backwards will buy you anything....it will have the same ratios if mounted forward. If you have the first tranny in first and the second tranny in second it would be the same as if you had the first one in second...the only thing two trannys would buy you is let you run a really high gear in the rearend....like a 2.73...and then you could put one tranny in first and the second in second for a really low gear for takeoffs....correct me if I am wrong
The second one will be mounted backwards for OD effect. I know lots of trucks with second trannys around here for low, low gears, but I want to run the second tranny backwards for an OD. For example, with the second tranny in 3rd, it will be like the second transmission didn't exist due to the 1:1 ratio in 3rd. Once on the highway, you could put the second transmission in second and it would be an OD since it is backwards(Ratio would be backwards).
__________________
'72 K-20 EFI'ed 250 Inline/4spd stake body, Farm Truck
'71 C-20 Cummins Diesel Powered, In storage thanks to $5.00 diesel!
'69 3500 GMC 305V-6/4spd, Still under reconstruction..........

Inlines Rule! 6 soldiers standing is better than 8 laying down!!!!!!!!
TP from Cntl PA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2005, 08:30 PM   #9
tom hand
CCRider
 
tom hand's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Olive Branch,MS,USA
Posts: 2,232
Ratio would be backwards...duh...you are correct
__________________
72 GMC Sierra SWB almost finished---- 84 Softail
Olive Branch MS
tom hand is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com