Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-17-2005, 09:22 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Mountain Top, Pa
Posts: 323
|
tire size? 295/50 vs.295/60
Hey folks,
I think I'll be lowering my 87 shor wide this year. Most likely 3/4. So what's the better tire size for a 15/8" rally 295/50/15 or 295/60/15 or do you have any suggestions. I dont want it to look puny in the wells. I'm running 30/9.50's bfg at's now, they fiil the wells nicely but are way to skinny. How about some thoughts. HOw are folks doing it? are you running even wider in the back??? How wide can I go front back?? any pics. thanks norv
__________________
1986 C10 Scottsdale 5.3, TH400 |
03-17-2005, 09:25 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Mountain Top, Pa
Posts: 323
|
pic
__________________
1986 C10 Scottsdale 5.3, TH400 |
03-17-2005, 09:41 AM | #3 |
Insert witty comment here
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lakeville Minnesota
Posts: 388
|
The net diffrence of the two is the 295 70 is about an inch taller.
You can compair any size tires you want at this site. It helped me with a visual aid. Its a customized tire size calculator for you to compare your current tire size to a new and different size tire, or any two tire sizes you might think of (well, within reason) http://www.secret-secret.com/turbo/D...turbotire.html Please note that this requires a Java-enabled Browser
__________________
So many trucks, So little time! |
03-17-2005, 09:54 AM | #4 |
Slots go on anything!
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Richardson, TX
Posts: 5,957
|
I would suggest the 285/70 BFG Radial T/A. It is a tall and wide tire. That may be a little big on an 8" wheel.
__________________
1974 Jimmy- 5.3/4L80e/NP241 |
03-17-2005, 05:46 PM | #5 |
Parts and more parts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lebo, Kansas (middle of nowhere
Posts: 6,821
|
My son's truck (86 Chevy short wide bed)and my truck (84 GMC short wide bed), both have 295/ 50/ R15 tires on the rear, with 245/60/R15 tires on the front. These are mounted on 15X8 rims with a four inch drop in the rear and a 3 1/2 inch drop in the front. There is plenty of room for the wider tire.
|
03-17-2005, 09:45 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Mountain Top, Pa
Posts: 323
|
pieces, you wouldnt happen to have few pics??
norv
__________________
1986 C10 Scottsdale 5.3, TH400 |
03-18-2005, 12:21 AM | #7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: South Wichita,KS
Posts: 698
|
I do.
__________________
Sean Midwest All Truck Nationals, Riverside, MO - 2008 - 2015 |
03-18-2005, 07:43 AM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Mountain Top, Pa
Posts: 323
|
Thanks for the photo's.
Is there a reason to go thick thin. Will 295's fit up front or do the thinner tires just look better up there. norv
__________________
1986 C10 Scottsdale 5.3, TH400 |
03-18-2005, 05:52 PM | #9 |
Parts and more parts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lebo, Kansas (middle of nowhere
Posts: 6,821
|
You can put 295s up front, but the fender will suffer at the ride height that the trucks are in the photos. I looked at all of the combinations before I finally settled on the combinations that we are using. I have a lot of Hot Rod Power Tour miles (rough roads) on the black truck with those tires and no complaints.
|
03-21-2005, 11:48 AM | #10 |
Overcamber
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Skead ,Ontario
Posts: 109
|
I've run 295/50's now for 16 years with no problems..summer driver only tho..here are some picks before and after the new paint job....
|
03-21-2005, 11:49 AM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Mountain Top, Pa
Posts: 323
|
Overcamber,
thanks is that stock height??? norv
__________________
1986 C10 Scottsdale 5.3, TH400 |
03-21-2005, 11:54 AM | #12 |
Overcamber
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Skead ,Ontario
Posts: 109
|
yes it is..this is pic before paint job
|
Bookmarks |
|
|