The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-03-2005, 06:52 PM   #1
iluvmy72
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Springville, UT, USA
Posts: 1,010
would I get a better MPG with a 4.3

I have a 4.3 throttle body engine and 700r4 tranny form a 88 astro van. The van is in sad shape but the engine and tranny have been rebuilt. Would this be better for economy if used as a daily driver? The truck currently has a standard 350 engine in it with a 4 barrel carter carb.
iluvmy72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2005, 07:57 PM   #2
CHEVIBUBBA
got boost?
 
CHEVIBUBBA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 123
if your simply running empty to work & back etc. then, yes.
primarily due to e.f.i. & o.d.
the throttle body injection isn't that much better than a carb that is correctly tuned but, it is better.
i would expect about 5% better due to e.f.i., 7-10% better for v6 vs. v8 & 10-15% due to going overdrive.
if you start pulling or hauling your gonna miss the v8!& your mileage will likely be worse.
__________________
'70 chevy lwb w/'67 hood.
357 s.b.c. built, 4l60 w/vigilante lockup high stall converter, edelbrock pro-flo,brodix heads,comp cams rollerized w/ belt drive, one piece d-shaft, yada, yada, yada.....
'82 honda v45 sabre"the black"
CHEVIBUBBA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2005, 08:03 PM   #3
Longhorn Man
its all about the +6 inches
 
Longhorn Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hilliard Ohio
Posts: 2,693
My observations with a 92 W code 4.3 (that's the Vortec injection) was pretty poor MPG even when the engine was still fairly tight. Had it in a 92 S-10 blazer with the 4l60 (e?) tranny, and I think the best I ever saw out od it was 21 MPG...in a small light weight body. It was OK performance wise, but like he said, put a trailer on it, and it is a total dog....heck, put 4 full sized men with duffle bags in it and it is a dog.
Longhorn Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2005, 08:28 PM   #4
longhorn71
Senior Member
 
longhorn71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: CANADA
Posts: 1,681
i think the milage would be worse even empty.the older trucks are way heavier than the newer ones.So the engine would be workin harder to pull just the truck around.IMO i would swap the rear gears and or put an overdrive trans in it
longhorn71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2005, 08:32 PM   #5
LUV2XCLR8
The LuvShack Garage
 
LUV2XCLR8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Maple Grove, TN (West Side)
Posts: 30,482
PERSONALLY, IN A DD BEATER TRUCK, I THINK A 4.3 IN A 67-72 WOULD BE
__________________
Owner/Op: "TN Classic Transport Carriers"
The Toy: "Square Vette" 72 Hybrid Blazer
Toy Barn: "LuvShack" 40 x 60 x 20 Shop
Tow Piggy:"Maddy" 88 Silverado 3500
Hauler: "Feathers" 14 Aluma 8218T
LUV2XCLR8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com