The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Engine & Drivetrain

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-26-2005, 06:23 AM   #1
buckola
1 Wrench / 10 Knuckles
 
buckola's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Burlington Ontario
Posts: 179
Question Edelbrock ?

A friend let me try his Edelbrock 1407 carb in place of the Q-Jet.The truck starts,idles and accelerats much smoother than the Q-Jet. It does have a slight bog at hard acceleration but it may be running a little lean. What It doen't have is the same BHAAAWAAA or the kick in the pants that the Q-Jet had when the secondaries opened.
I feel a 750 cfm may be a little large for a motor that is as mildly built as mine ( see sig) but should I expect more from the Edelbrock?

I suspect that the secondaries may not be opening. Is there a procedure for checking to see that they are functioning without staring in to the carb at full throttle?

thanks in advance


steve
__________________
1970 GMC Custom
Vortec Heads, Edelbrock Performer Intake, Crane 272 Energizer, Hedman Full Length HTC Headers

2006 Dodge Charger SRT8. 1/4 mile 13.3

1973 Z1 900 Kawasaki ( all original)
buckola is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2005, 06:42 AM   #2
vtblazer
Registered User
 
vtblazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Central Vermont
Posts: 8,537
You'll never get the same 'kick in the pants' feel from the Edelbrock as you did from the Q-jet, just compare the secondaries.

The Edelbrock has a weighted set up on the secondaries, the bottem plates will open at W.O.T. (as long as the choke is off) but the 'flaps' will only give what your motor is asking for.
Kinda like vacuum secondaries only different.

Last edited by vtblazer; 05-27-2005 at 11:26 AM.
vtblazer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2005, 08:07 AM   #3
53burb
Senior Member
 
53burb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Queen Creek, AZ
Posts: 1,010
ttt
53burb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2005, 02:55 PM   #4
67chevemall
Registered User
 
67chevemall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NB
Posts: 3,367
Q jet gets my vote.
67chevemall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2005, 01:32 AM   #5
cowboy33713
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: metro Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 241
Howdy:
I'm getting ready to install one of those Edelbrock carbs myself, in this case a 1405 (600 cfm) that I bought used. Going on a low compression 350 with ram's horn exhaust manifolds.
My past experience with QJets has been good, but all on stock engines, where the carb was factory tuned to work well with that specific combination. The "vacuum cleaner" sound from under the hood when the accelerator was floored,and the T400 kicked down into passing gear was something to hear.
When I switched ( being young and ill informed at the time, LOL) to a Holley
650 spread bore with mechanical secondaries ( 'cause it was listed as a direct "QJET replacement" that would fit the stock intake), it , of course, bogged when suddenly fed too much air. The other part of the problem was that I had not made a required adjustment of the T400 kickdown switch to suit the throttle position of the different carb. Fixing THAT helped regain the boot in the pants, which was, of course, from the trans kicking down into passing gear.
Just a few things to consider. I have found that the 1405 I have has been tuned to give a richer mixture than my mild engine needs; it will be jetted back to where Edelbrock had it as a starting point. The 600 cfm size is probably more than this engine will use, but, the "Air Valve Secondary" system is a good one, and will not give more than the engine demands(up to the flow capacity of the carb);the Qjet uses a variation of this design, as did other Rochester 4bbls, and of course the Carter AFB carbs,(though the Carter ThermoQuad had the Air Valve above the secondary discharge nozzles, more like the QJet does) which the Edelbrock's are a redesign of.
Just my $.02 (maybe $.03!).
Humbly,
cowboy33713
cowboy33713 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2005, 02:13 AM   #6
Hoods69BadBowTie
Chevys Kick A$$
 
Hoods69BadBowTie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Zootown, MT
Posts: 12,699
I like my Eldebrock stuff but I love my Q-Jet setup too. They both have their disadvantages and advantages.
-Later
__________________
*HOODS is what I answer too*
-'79, '77, '88 Pickup Sold, '85 Camaro, '83 T/A, '81,'83,'90 K5 Blazer All Sold
-'79 3/4 ton "Big Yellow Bananna" Lifted 4spd. 39.5 TSL Swampers, The money Pit
-'86 K5 Blazer Silverado 6.2 4" lift 35"s
-'95 Ext. Cab Shorty 4" Tuff Country rolling 35" M/T's
-'83 Monte Carlo T-Tops. 126,500 Original Miles
-LATER
I would rather push a Chevy then drive a ford!!

Last edited by Hoods69BadBowTie; 05-29-2005 at 02:13 AM.
Hoods69BadBowTie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2005, 02:18 AM   #7
fastwillie 696969
~Rest In Peace~
 
fastwillie 696969's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: CALIFORNIA NOR CAL
Posts: 9,707
i go with edelbrock carbs i like the fact its plug and play carb and adjusting the jets cant be any easier to swap plus have you seen vics daughters they rock
__________________
is it fast ? it has a lighting bolt donut?


B___H please, I can remove 90% of your so called "beauty" with a kleenex
fastwillie 696969 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-30-2005, 09:17 PM   #8
chevy72blu
Registered User
 
chevy72blu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 2,188
the AFB-type(Edelbrock) has large primaries, and small secondaries. The Q-jet is opposite.
__________________
RIP EastSideLowLife

'72 C20 SWB convert. 5 lug, LS1/4l60e
chevy72blu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2005, 12:13 AM   #9
62ChevyStep
Senior Member
 
62ChevyStep's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Portales, NM
Posts: 359
Thumbs up 1405 Edlebrock and Performer 2101 Intake

Just finished installing today on my 62'. I am running a 350 SB with a TH350 couldn't be happier. Was running a stock intake and Qjet. Whole different truck, smooth idle and cruising, but runs like a raped ape/scalded dog when you get on it and the th350 kicks down, pulls hard all the way through.

bought the 1405 used, tanked it, bought a rebuild kit, rebuilt it, installed and dialed in. Easiest install and adjustment yet.
__________________
________________________
62' 3.5/5 drop SWB Fleet, PS, PB-Dsk/Drm,350/700R4
08' Chevrolet Silverado CrewCab
05'Toyota Tacoma Prerunner SR5
62ChevyStep is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com