The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-02-2005, 01:33 PM   #1
redneckdds
Senior Member
 
redneckdds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Queen Creek, AZ
Posts: 218
350 or LS1 or ??

350 or LS1 or ??



what is your choice of engine for the shortbed? or do you like something different? I dont have a tranny picked out, either the turbo350 or 700R4... I'll take suggestions there too. I want the truck fast!!!
redneckdds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2005, 01:36 PM   #2
68 short step
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: tulsa OK
Posts: 3,070
Re: 350 or LS1 or ??

no brainer--------ls1 with 4l60(e).........fast and good gas milage, a must for all these greedy shevron people.
68 short step is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2005, 02:01 PM   #3
shifty
Questionable
 
shifty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 13,376
Re: 350 or LS1 or ??

LS1 is an easy swap, but will cost you some money. You can also remove the computer and the other EFI related crap, throw a carb on it and mate it up to a 700R4 or TH350, there was an article explaining fully how to do this in an issue of Classic Trucks from 2-3 months ago. I have a copy of it at my house.

I'm dropping an LS1 + T56 6spd in my truck right now. Hope to have it bolted up the rest of the way by Monday. It's sitting in there, I just gotta make some cab floor modifications for my particular application.
__________________
If I've got anything up for grabs, it'll be here: 7-hole gauge cluster for a 67-72 p/u FREE (link)

I can't check the forum daily. If I don't reply to you within 24 hours, drop me a PM! I'm (hopefully) still alive and will reply faster to a PM.
shifty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2005, 03:12 PM   #4
70rs/ss
Registered User
 
70rs/ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Northern AZ
Posts: 7,271
Re: 350 or LS1 or ??

Quote:
Originally Posted by shifty
LS1 is an easy swap, but will cost you some money. You can also remove the computer and the other EFI related crap, throw a carb on it and mate it up to a 700R4 or TH350, there was an article explaining fully how to do this in an issue of Classic Trucks from 2-3 months ago. I have a copy of it at my house.

I'm dropping an LS1 + T56 6spd in my truck right now. Hope to have it bolted up the rest of the way by Monday. It's sitting in there, I just gotta make some cab floor modifications for my particular application.

I think Edelbrock sells the intake with the coils, dist and all for like 600-800 bones. Kinda defeats the purpose of adding an LS1, but still better than the carb'd 350 or yesteryear.
70rs/ss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2005, 03:39 PM   #5
shifty
Questionable
 
shifty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 13,376
Re: 350 or LS1 or ??

I don't think it negates the purpose...but that's just my opinion. In general, I think parts are easier to find for the LS1, I think in general it looks just as nice as the newer models, I think it generally a nice sight and ...lots of small perks - but no huge perks. You can always move towares FI later should you really want to ditch the carb.
__________________
If I've got anything up for grabs, it'll be here: 7-hole gauge cluster for a 67-72 p/u FREE (link)

I can't check the forum daily. If I don't reply to you within 24 hours, drop me a PM! I'm (hopefully) still alive and will reply faster to a PM.
shifty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2005, 03:44 PM   #6
chevyguy_72
Vintage Evil
 
chevyguy_72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Broomfield, CO
Posts: 956
Re: 350 or LS1 or ??

Quote:
Originally Posted by shifty
I don't think it negates the purpose...but that's just my opinion. In general, I think parts are easier to find for the LS1, I think in general it looks just as nice as the newer models, I think it generally a nice sight and ...lots of small perks - but no huge perks. You can always move towares FI later should you really want to ditch the carb.
Was just checking out your progress pics. Looks good.
Are you going to be able to get that alternator off if it goes bad?
It looks as if that might be quite a process but of course i can't see it in real life
chevyguy_72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2005, 03:50 PM   #7
70rs/ss
Registered User
 
70rs/ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Northern AZ
Posts: 7,271
Re: 350 or LS1 or ??

Quote:
Originally Posted by shifty
I don't think it negates the purpose...but that's just my opinion. In general, I think parts are easier to find for the LS1, I think in general it looks just as nice as the newer models, I think it generally a nice sight and ...lots of small perks - but no huge perks. You can always move towares FI later should you really want to ditch the carb.

Well not totally, but the idea of driveability, cold starts, MPG are all intricately interwoven with FI. I have an LT1 that I plan to put aluminum heads and a 383 stroker kit into it and then I was talking with TPI in Phoenix about all of the hassle with reprogramming it, then I said, "well why not do away with the FI." The response was why use an LT1? If it is just a swap, then the FI is at least half the reason to do the swap. Anyways I'd put a carb on one, but not if I had the wiring and comp, because $600 goes a long way to getting the FI up and running. I also have decided to do the 383 into the LT1 and I'll use the FI because that is the biggest part of the cool factor when the hood is opened (it also helps when it is 6 d@mn degrees in the morning for start up!)
70rs/ss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2005, 04:04 PM   #8
shifty
Questionable
 
shifty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 13,376
Re: 350 or LS1 or ??

Quote:
Originally Posted by chevyguy_72
Was just checking out your progress pics. Looks good.
Are you going to be able to get that alternator off if it goes bad?
It looks as if that might be quite a process but of course i can't see it in real life
Alternator is on, I wound up taking off the A/C compressor and it fits great. Look at the "LS1 install" gallery, go to page 4 there should be pics of it sitting in with alternator attached
__________________
If I've got anything up for grabs, it'll be here: 7-hole gauge cluster for a 67-72 p/u FREE (link)

I can't check the forum daily. If I don't reply to you within 24 hours, drop me a PM! I'm (hopefully) still alive and will reply faster to a PM.
shifty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2005, 06:41 PM   #9
68Stepbed
Registered User
 
68Stepbed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 10-Uh-See
Posts: 5,609
Re: 350 or LS1 or ??

I'm not knocking the LS1. It's a great engine. IMO, best bang for the buck: ZZ4 with a 700R4 tranny. Easy swap, easy to find parts and brackets for and still hauls A$$.

Just my .02
__________________
Matt

68 C10 stepside, LS1/700R4, TCI Engineering suspension system
68Stepbed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2005, 07:33 PM   #10
Aquivarious
Registered User
 
Aquivarious's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Alton, Illinois
Posts: 90
Re: 350 or LS1 or ??

May sound like a dumb question.... but is a Th700 and a 700R4 the same tranny or.... what?
__________________
'71 Chevy C-10 SWB (Project)
'04 Mazda RX-8 (F*** around Car)
'85 Chevy C-20 (Former Project)

Currently Serving In IRAQ. (Man it sucks over here..)
Aquivarious is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2005, 07:43 PM   #11
FRENCHBLUE72
PROJECT 7DEUCE
 
FRENCHBLUE72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: GRANTS PASS OR
Posts: 21,594
Re: 350 or LS1 or ??

yes they are..... Ls1 is the way I would go...
__________________
GO BIG GREEN GO DUCKS



MEMBER #6377

72 k-5 daily driver 6'' lift 35'' 350-350-205 slowly getting rust free.

Project "7DEUCE"

check out my build http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=267665



Tim Powell..R.I.P EastSideLowlife..... R.I.P..
FRENCHBLUE72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2005, 07:59 PM   #12
FirstGen
Just Don't Stop!
 
FirstGen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,239
Re: 350 or LS1 or ??

LS1... the only people that vote for another platform is because they don't have a LS1 vehilce.
__________________
1968 C10 build in process
TT LSA/6L90e/9"
FirstGen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2005, 11:08 PM   #13
chevy_fatman
Where's my beer?
 
chevy_fatman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: I live in the state of denial....
Posts: 5,621
Re: 350 or LS1 or ??

Quote:
Originally Posted by FirstGen
LS1... the only people that vote for another platform is because they don't have a LS1 vehilce.

LS1 all the way, that's all I got to say
__________________
Paul




How do you make the invisible, visible?.........You take it away.
chevy_fatman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2005, 06:38 PM   #14
shifty
Questionable
 
shifty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 13,376
Re: 350 or LS1 or ??

I'd agree that a great engine is a ZZ4 - you can easily build it up to run the quarter mile and make it ballzout. But I wouldn't pick a drivetrain that's all about performance with less of the modern conveniences of a newer FI engine.

ZZ4 = serious power potential + less gas mileage + some annoyances associated with carb'd engines.
LS1 = good power potential + good gas mileage + some modern convenience (quick starts, etc.)
__________________
If I've got anything up for grabs, it'll be here: 7-hole gauge cluster for a 67-72 p/u FREE (link)

I can't check the forum daily. If I don't reply to you within 24 hours, drop me a PM! I'm (hopefully) still alive and will reply faster to a PM.
shifty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2005, 08:46 PM   #15
FirstGen
Just Don't Stop!
 
FirstGen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,239
Re: 350 or LS1 or ??

Quote:
Originally Posted by shifty
I'd agree that a great engine is a ZZ4 - you can easily build it up to run the quarter mile and make it ballzout. But I wouldn't pick a drivetrain that's all about performance with less of the modern conveniences of a newer FI engine.

ZZ4 = serious power potential + less gas mileage + some annoyances associated with carb'd engines.
LS1 = good power potential + good gas mileage + some modern convenience (quick starts, etc.)

I would even go as far as to say that the LS1 platform has a better horsepower potential than the ZZ4 motors. I've had both and I can tell you right now that my ZZ4 didn't make 450 horsepower to the ground with just a cam and mid length headers...
__________________
1968 C10 build in process
TT LSA/6L90e/9"
FirstGen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2005, 12:10 AM   #16
shifty
Questionable
 
shifty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 13,376
Re: 350 or LS1 or ??

True, but I thought the LS1 was limited to 800HP b/c of the aluminum block and the ZZ4 was good up to 1200 or something?
__________________
If I've got anything up for grabs, it'll be here: 7-hole gauge cluster for a 67-72 p/u FREE (link)

I can't check the forum daily. If I don't reply to you within 24 hours, drop me a PM! I'm (hopefully) still alive and will reply faster to a PM.
shifty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2005, 02:42 AM   #17
72Short_Cut
Registered User
 
72Short_Cut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Red Deer, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 48
Re: 350 or LS1 or ??

Go with the LS1 with the 4L60e, im in the middle of this swap. You'll get good power, great gas milage and look really sweet, its been a fairly easy swap so far. they are easy to find also, i got mine with less then 11000 miles out of a firebird that was rear ended for cheap.
__________________
1972 Chevy Short Box
Ls1 swap
1977 chevy Chevette
72Short_Cut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2005, 02:56 AM   #18
FirstGen
Just Don't Stop!
 
FirstGen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,239
Re: 350 or LS1 or ??

Quote:
Originally Posted by shifty
True, but I thought the LS1 was limited to 800HP b/c of the aluminum block and the ZZ4 was good up to 1200 or something?

There are plenty of guys making over 800 hp on the aluminum blocks. However you could always use a 6.0 block if you were that serious. That's what most of the stroker motor guys use.
__________________
1968 C10 build in process
TT LSA/6L90e/9"
FirstGen is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com