Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-15-2006, 01:41 PM | #1 |
Active Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Virginia
Posts: 169
|
Is this really a factory truck?
__________________
71 Blazer CST 72 K20 Capt USAF |
04-15-2006, 01:58 PM | #2 |
its all about the +6 inches
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hilliard Ohio
Posts: 2,693
|
Re: Is this really a factory truck?
I'll bet a kick in the nuts it isn't real.
Anyone wanna take that bet? IU say it is a cab/chassis with a longhorn bed tosserd on it. If some one asks for a pic of the glove box, or simply gets the model number off of it, then we'll know 100% of the story. The model number alone will prove it. |
04-15-2006, 02:13 PM | #3 |
PROJECT 7DEUCE
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: GRANTS PASS OR
Posts: 21,608
|
Re: Is this really a factory truck?
Seems like a lot of $$$ added to wire money storage fees etc etc.. I did send a e-mail to ask for more pics and a pic of the glove box door... We shall see what happens..
__________________
GO BIG GREEN GO DUCKS MEMBER #6377 72 k-5 daily driver 6'' lift 35'' 350-350-205 slowly getting rust free. Project "7DEUCE" check out my build http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=267665 Tim Powell..R.I.P EastSideLowlife..... R.I.P.. |
04-15-2006, 02:48 PM | #4 |
The LuvShack Garage
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Maple Grove, TN (West Side)
Posts: 30,482
|
Re: Is this really a factory truck?
I thought Dually's had DUAL rear wheels
__________________
Owner/Op: "TN Classic Transport Carriers" The Toy: "Square Vette" 72 Hybrid Blazer Toy Barn: "LuvShack" 40 x 60 x 20 Shop Tow Piggy:"Maddy" 88 Silverado 3500 Hauler: "Feathers" 14 Aluma 8218T |
04-15-2006, 04:14 PM | #5 |
Old Skool Club
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Benton, AR "The Heart of Arkansas"
Posts: 10,880
|
Re: Is this really a factory truck?
My 1969 Chevrolet Truck Data Book doesn't say you can't have dual rear wheels on a Longhorn. It seems that it was an option and a logical one, if you consider that the Longhorn was created to serve the growing RV industry. In that case, dual rear wheels would make the vehicle more stable. But, seems that some sort of fender flare would be needed. I don't think the tires would have been contained within the fender lines.
While it sounds fishy, stranger things have happened. It would have been nice if the seller had taken more pictures, including one of the glove box door data sticker.
__________________
Member Nr. 2770 '96 GMC Sportside; 4.3/SLT - Daily driven....constantly needs washed. '69 C-10 SWB; 350/TH400 - in limbo The older I get, the better I was. |
04-15-2006, 04:16 PM | #6 |
Special Order
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mt Airy, MD
Posts: 85,858
|
Re: Is this really a factory truck?
The ones that GM sold after`72 were called "Dooley",not dually.
__________________
"BUILDING A BETTER WAY TO SERVE THE USA"......67/72......"The New Breed" GMC '67 C1500 Wideside Super Custom SWB: 327/M22/3.42 posi.........."The '67" (project) GMC '72 K2500 Wideside Sierra Custom Camper: 350/TH350/4.10 Power-Lok..."The '72" (rolling) Tim "Don't call me a redneck. I'm a rough cut country gentleman" R.I.P. ~ East Side Low Life ~ El Jay ~ 72BLUZ ~ Fasteddie69 ~ Ron586 ~ 67ChevyRedneck ~ Grumpy Old Man ~ |
04-15-2006, 04:45 PM | #7 |
its all about the +6 inches
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hilliard Ohio
Posts: 2,693
|
Re: Is this really a factory truck?
The daullie trucks in 67 - 72 had the tires to the inside, not to the outside. Installing the bed on one would place the tire directly under the bed side. Just a mini-flare would do fine... like those gay things you see attached to jeeps, and custom vans from the '70's.
If you look through your 69 data book, you'll see no option listed in any section of trucks with beds for daul wheels. They were only avalible on cab/chassis or cowl/chassis models. I suppose you could have special ordered something, but then it would be a COPO vehicle, and untill I see one, I'll say none were built. Like I said, once we see the model number, we'll know the whole story. Also, notice, in the picture, he has daullie front wheels, but normal 8 lug rears.... I'm willing to say, that there wasn't enough room for the extreem offest of the daullie wheels in the fenderwells. I *think* you need to extend the tubs a bit...but I may be mistaken on that one. |
04-15-2006, 04:46 PM | #8 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Claremore, OK
Posts: 486
|
Re: Is this really a factory truck?
Holy Cow, he didn't ask for character references and mothers maiden name too???
|
04-15-2006, 04:46 PM | #9 | |
its all about the +6 inches
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hilliard Ohio
Posts: 2,693
|
Re: Is this really a factory truck?
Quote:
|
|
04-15-2006, 05:38 PM | #10 |
its all about the +6 inches
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hilliard Ohio
Posts: 2,693
|
Re: Is this really a factory truck?
Looking at it some more, notice the bed was 2 tone paint, and the body wasn't.
I requested pics, or simply the model number. We'll see what happens. |
04-15-2006, 05:51 PM | #11 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Beeville, Texas
Posts: 1,943
|
Re: Is this really a factory truck?
Throwing away the four original 2 piece budd rims was stupid since the newer 1 piece rims won't fit over the rear drums........
__________________
RJD 1984 Chevrolet C30 welding truck 454/SM465 1977 GMC C15 pickup 350/TH350 1970 Chevrolet C20 pickup 350/TH400 1970 Chevrolet K20 Suburban 454/TH350 1969 GMC 8500 478M V6/5 spd winch truck |
04-15-2006, 06:15 PM | #12 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 187
|
Re: Is this really a factory truck?
Quote:
Not that there's anything wrong with that. |
|
04-15-2006, 06:16 PM | #13 |
its all about the +6 inches
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hilliard Ohio
Posts: 2,693
|
Re: Is this really a factory truck?
Lol!
|
04-15-2006, 06:51 PM | #14 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Birmingham,Alabama
Posts: 260
|
Re: Is this really a factory truck?
100 bucks just to look at it, makes ya think its not what he says it is and is hoping noone will come look at it and just buy it off ebay
__________________
1969 c10 stepside 250 inline six, 4speed granny tranny, 4.11 posi rear end |
04-15-2006, 07:16 PM | #15 |
its all about the +6 inches
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hilliard Ohio
Posts: 2,693
|
Re: Is this really a factory truck?
the minority upset feed back makes him look like a tool.
He just added pics, I'll enlarge them and see if I can get the model number. |
04-15-2006, 07:38 PM | #16 |
its all about the +6 inches
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hilliard Ohio
Posts: 2,693
|
Re: Is this really a factory truck?
IT'S OFFICIAL... NOT FACTORY
Couldn't read the model number, however, a quick look at our VIN decoder on this site ( http://www.67-72chevytrucks.com/Chevyear.html ) shows that the 4th digit would be a 4 if the truck was originally built with a bed. The VIN of the truck in question is; CE339S8244*89* (the last two were kinda fuzy, but they don't matter anyways) This truck decodes as; C Conventional cab...2 wheel drive E V-8 powered 3 one ton 3 cab and chassis 9 1969 S St Louis assembly plant the rest is the serial number, or sequential number. Seller is either uninformed, or a tool trying to pull the wool over some poor sap's eyes. Sad thing is, some one will buy it thinking it is gold. Looking at this info, and the model number decoder found on the same page as linked above, the model number will be; CE310903Sxxxxxx Last edited by Longhorn Man; 04-15-2006 at 08:08 PM. |
04-15-2006, 07:40 PM | #17 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 21,020
|
Re: Is this really a factory truck?
I will go buy it right now.
|
04-15-2006, 08:52 PM | #18 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Birmingham,Alabama
Posts: 260
|
Re: Is this really a factory truck?
Quote:
if something wasnt right it was always the buyers fault, This guys as trustworth as michael jackson at a grade school christmas pagent
__________________
1969 c10 stepside 250 inline six, 4speed granny tranny, 4.11 posi rear end |
|
04-15-2006, 09:19 PM | #19 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: coatesville,pa
Posts: 116
|
Re: Is this really a factory truck?
Check it out ,has factory side pipes too? It was probably a flat bed dually that someone put a longhorn bed on,that would be easy enough to do.
|
04-15-2006, 09:59 PM | #20 |
BlahBlahBlah
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Wa.
Posts: 19,942
|
Re: Is this really a factory truck?
the thing i find most amusing about this truck is the fact he says it would bring over 100 grand restored. if you had purchased a 72 cheyenne super, short fleet with every option available and stored it from day one in a climate controlled garage i doubt you could get 100k for it.
|
04-15-2006, 10:03 PM | #21 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 21,020
|
Re: Is this really a factory truck?
Quote:
in crappy condition on ebay has to be worth at least $200000 |
|
04-15-2006, 10:14 PM | #22 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Southern Pines NC
Posts: 3,853
|
Re: Is this really a factory truck?
yep, worth every penny!
My boss way back built a 68 C-30 dual rear wheel tow truck. He didn't want a wide truck for down town use so he put a fleet bed on it and a holmes 440. the wheels didn't stick out but we had to modify the inside wheel tubs, cut and splice so they were wider toward the inside. Love those split rims, boy they can fly! |
04-15-2006, 10:51 PM | #23 |
Special Order
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mt Airy, MD
Posts: 85,858
|
Re: Is this really a factory truck?
[QUOTE=Also, notice, in the picture, he has daullie front wheels, but normal 8 lug rears.... I'm willing to say, that there wasn't enough room for the extreem offest of the daullie wheels in the fenderwells. I *think* you need to extend the tubs a bit...but I may be mistaken on that one.[/QUOTE]
You are correct.There is less than 48" between inner tires on cab`n`chassis. The guy`s a tool,right again.If he`s misinformed,he sure talks like he has proof.Which he doesn`t.Sound`s like a barstool expert.
__________________
"BUILDING A BETTER WAY TO SERVE THE USA"......67/72......"The New Breed" GMC '67 C1500 Wideside Super Custom SWB: 327/M22/3.42 posi.........."The '67" (project) GMC '72 K2500 Wideside Sierra Custom Camper: 350/TH350/4.10 Power-Lok..."The '72" (rolling) Tim "Don't call me a redneck. I'm a rough cut country gentleman" R.I.P. ~ East Side Low Life ~ El Jay ~ 72BLUZ ~ Fasteddie69 ~ Ron586 ~ 67ChevyRedneck ~ Grumpy Old Man ~ |
04-15-2006, 11:20 PM | #24 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Idaho
Posts: 4,034
|
Re: Is this really a factory truck?
Notice that you can't see the longhorn model number option code
__________________
"Remember, They can Kill You, but they can't eat You, That's against the law!!!!!!!!!" |
04-15-2006, 11:38 PM | #25 |
Where's my beer?
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: I live in the state of denial....
Posts: 5,621
|
Re: Is this really a factory truck?
WTF is up with the $100.00 access fee and transport prep charge for removal from the storage area and the $20.00 for the bank receiving fee he sure wnats to make money on top of selling the truck.
__________________
Paul How do you make the invisible, visible?.........You take it away. |
Bookmarks |
|
|