The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-01-2006, 10:46 PM   #1
CDN_Redneck
Registered User
 
CDN_Redneck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Tsawwassen, BC
Posts: 33
They said it couldn't be done...

...So we did it!

My 1968 GMC 3/4 ton, 2wd officially became a 4x4 last month. We started with a 2wd, inline 6, '68 frame, and finished with a 4x4, 350 chevy sb and '84 frame. It took us 6 weekends, including a weekend "borrowing" a bobcat excavator, help from friends, and lots of beer (to convince the friends to help ). We had to find a way to hide 6 inches of frame as the '84 is longer than the '68 and I still need to put different tires on it, but that involves cutting the front fender a bit as I want 35's on it. Here's a link to the pics : http://community.webshots.com/user/mzdiddl There's also an album there of the first build a year and a half ago.

We ended up doing body lifts in different parts of the truck as the frames are completely different and making new mounts for the cab and front clip. There's still a bit of work left to do, but it's back on the road now. Overall I'm incredibly happy with the outcome!



Dana
__________________
1968 GMC 3/4 ton, lwb, 350 sb, 4-speed 4x4

Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, rye in one hand, beer in the other, body thoroughly used up, totally worn out and screaming "YEEHAW what a ride!"
CDN_Redneck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2006, 10:53 PM   #2
rage'nrat638
Account Suspended
 
rage'nrat638's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: ** THE FALL GUY **CHICAGO IL
Posts: 5,883
Re: They said it couldn't be done...

sweet...
rage'nrat638 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2006, 06:13 AM   #3
Palf70Step
State of Confusion!

 
Palf70Step's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gulfport, MS USA
Posts: 47,083
Re: They said it couldn't be done...

Nice Job. It looks ready for action!
__________________
Bill
1970 Chevy Custom/10 LWB Fleetside
2010 Toyota Tacoma PreRunner SR5 Double Cab - DD

Member of Louisiana Classic Truck Club (LCTC)

Bill's Gallery
Life isn't tied with a bow, but it's still a gift.
Live simply. Love generously. Care deeply. Speak kindly. Leave the rest to God!
Palf70Step is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2006, 08:20 AM   #4
hd78glide
Registered User
 
hd78glide's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Winnipeg Canada
Posts: 88
Re: They said it couldn't be done...

Nice...
__________________
1967 GMC 1/2 ton
1972 GMC Sierra
1975 Chev 5/4 ton
1978 1/2 Harley FLH
1998 K1500 diesel
hd78glide is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2006, 11:28 AM   #5
Karl Hoh
A little east of nowhere
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: LaBroquerie,Manitoba Canada
Posts: 168
Re: They said it couldn't be done...

Sweet, sure would like to know the details. I had planned on doing this with my 69 and 80 4x4, but the rad brace mounts on the front spring hangers have me concerned. Everything else should just be changing mount locations and spacing,?
__________________
68 C10 250 4spd
69 C20 327 4spd
69 910 250 3spd
80 K10 350 4spd
76 C60 366 5spd school bus

"THERE'S NOTHING YOU CAN BREAK THAT SOMEONE CAN'T BE PAID TO REPAIR"
Karl Hoh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2006, 11:51 AM   #6
CDN_Redneck
Registered User
 
CDN_Redneck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Tsawwassen, BC
Posts: 33
Re: They said it couldn't be done...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Karl Hoh
Sweet, sure would like to know the details. I had planned on doing this with my 69 and 80 4x4, but the rad brace mounts on the front spring hangers have me concerned. Everything else should just be changing mount locations and spacing,?
We fabricated new mounts for the front clip, and it ended up having a 3" body lift. For the front of the cab, we pulled the old mounts off the '68 frame and mounted them on the new '84 frame (there was slight modification to these mounts). You have to take off the '84 mounts as it's literally a few inches they have to move. That ended up with almost 5" of body lift. The rear of the cab mounts to the stock '84 mounts (which are directly on the frame). For the box, we used 4 of the stock mounts on the '84 frame and a 3.5" body lift. We are still currently manufacturing the other 2 mounts as the '84 frame curves more than the '68. We had to extend the steering arm. The clutch and throttle linkages we had to fabricate. This may have just been for our truck as the donor frame was off an '84 diesel, and I blew up the old clutch on the '68 We had no problems with the rad mounts, so I'm not sure if ours are different than what's on your truck.
Essentially, we had a lot of luck on our side as we had no idea if it would work when we started. We just pluncked the body on and leveled it by eye. At least the old trucks have nice lines to go by!

Dana
__________________
1968 GMC 3/4 ton, lwb, 350 sb, 4-speed 4x4

Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, rye in one hand, beer in the other, body thoroughly used up, totally worn out and screaming "YEEHAW what a ride!"
CDN_Redneck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2006, 03:14 AM   #7
Karl Hoh
A little east of nowhere
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: LaBroquerie,Manitoba Canada
Posts: 168
Re: They said it couldn't be done...

OK, Your details of the cab mounting have me confused. My 68 & 69s rear cab mounts are outside the frame and my 80 4x4's are inside on a crossmember. Are 3/4 tons different than 1/2 ton ?
__________________
68 C10 250 4spd
69 C20 327 4spd
69 910 250 3spd
80 K10 350 4spd
76 C60 366 5spd school bus

"THERE'S NOTHING YOU CAN BREAK THAT SOMEONE CAN'T BE PAID TO REPAIR"
Karl Hoh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2006, 05:51 AM   #8
special-K
Special Order

 
special-K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mt Airy, MD
Posts: 85,852
Re: They said it couldn't be done...

What was the reason for raising the cab and core support mounts?Was it to get the bed to line up?I`m asking because I plan to swap a`69 cab/clip onto a`91 Suburban frame and won`t be using a p/u bed.It will have a utility bed(service body),so body lines aren`t an issue.
__________________
"BUILDING A BETTER WAY TO SERVE THE USA"......67/72......"The New Breed"

GMC '67 C1500 Wideside Super Custom SWB: 327/M22/3.42 posi.........."The '67" (project)
GMC '72 K2500 Wideside Sierra Custom Camper: 350/TH350/4.10 Power-Lok..."The '72" (rolling)
Tim

"Don't call me a redneck. I'm a rough cut country gentleman"

R.I.P. ~ East Side Low Life ~ El Jay ~ 72BLUZ ~ Fasteddie69 ~ Ron586 ~ 67ChevyRedneck ~ Grumpy Old Man ~
special-K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2006, 10:46 AM   #9
CDN_Redneck
Registered User
 
CDN_Redneck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Tsawwassen, BC
Posts: 33
Re: They said it couldn't be done...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Karl Hoh
OK, Your details of the cab mounting have me confused. My 68 & 69s rear cab mounts are outside the frame and my 80 4x4's are inside on a crossmember. Are 3/4 tons different than 1/2 ton ?
Sorry about the confusion.. it was a little confusing doing it.. heh

Ok.. So I shouldn't post in the morning before coffee. I got to work and had a look at the frame pics... the 84 frame front mounts are on the outside, just not in the right place for the 68 cab. I've attached pics so it's easier to see. (http://community.webshots.com/photo/...51728284KsOsvn I couldn't resize the 68 frame at work, so here's the link)The rear cab mounts on the 68 are on outside of the frame, for the 84, they are on a crossmember inside the frame, which happened to line up with pre-existing holes in the 68 cab. I would assume that 1/2 and 3/4 are different, mine were both 3/4 ton so I"m not sure what yours would be.. as I mentioned, we had to modify the front cab mounts, they used the '68 mounts, but cut and welded to make them fit. I wasn't part of that, my boyfriend and his buddy built those.

Hope that helps a bit? There is a pic of both frames without a body on, so if you have time take a look.

Dana
Attached Images
  
__________________
1968 GMC 3/4 ton, lwb, 350 sb, 4-speed 4x4

Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, rye in one hand, beer in the other, body thoroughly used up, totally worn out and screaming "YEEHAW what a ride!"

Last edited by CDN_Redneck; 06-03-2006 at 01:01 PM. Reason: Pics added... and clarified
CDN_Redneck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2006, 10:49 AM   #10
CDN_Redneck
Registered User
 
CDN_Redneck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Tsawwassen, BC
Posts: 33
Re: They said it couldn't be done...

Quote:
Originally Posted by special-K
What was the reason for raising the cab and core support mounts?Was it to get the bed to line up?I`m asking because I plan to swap a`69 cab/clip onto a`91 Suburban frame and won`t be using a p/u bed.It will have a utility bed(service body),so body lines aren`t an issue.
If you have a look at the pictures labeled April 1, you'll clearly see why we had to lift different parts of the truck! hehe.. The front of the cab needed to be lifted as the frames bend in different places and the cab was very nose down. The only part of the '68 cab that sits properly on the '84 frame was the rear of the cab. It's a bit difficult to explain, there's lots of pics of both frames, and how the truck sat before and after the lift went in. I've also posted the frame pics in the post above, you can see how the '84 frame dips down in front.

Good luck in your swap, we just went with it, and modified what we needed to as we went along.

Dana
__________________
1968 GMC 3/4 ton, lwb, 350 sb, 4-speed 4x4

Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, rye in one hand, beer in the other, body thoroughly used up, totally worn out and screaming "YEEHAW what a ride!"

Last edited by CDN_Redneck; 06-03-2006 at 01:13 PM.
CDN_Redneck is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com