The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Suspension

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-29-2006, 10:10 AM   #1
jlaird
Senior Member
 
jlaird's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: johnstown, NY
Posts: 2,393
porterbuilt's dropmember vs. other IFS's

I've been following the other thread and been wanting to ask this question. What are the differences and pros and cons between PB's dropmember and other IFS you see in the mags like Fatmans and Jim Meyers?
jlaird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2006, 10:33 AM   #2
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,071
Re: porterbuilt's dropmember vs. other IFS's

Quote:
Originally Posted by jlaird
I've been following the other thread and been wanting to ask this question. What are the differences and pros and cons between PB's dropmember and other IFS you see in the mags like Fatmans and Jim Meyers?
Porterbuilts uses your a-arms w/slight mods (or ART arms w/o mods) as well as the truck spindles & brakes. Typically, the Fatman type front ends require you to change these parts to whatever their kit is based on (Fatman uses MII/GM combo & JMeyerRacing uses GM's F/B-body based parts).

From the pics listed in the original 'Dropmember' thread, the dropmember allows the rails to hit the ground...... not so w/Fatmans or JMR's. Does this mean it's only benefit is allowing you to drop it on the frame? No, it means that even @ ride height you will have more clearance when operating on the less than perfect roads around Anycity, USA.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2006, 01:39 PM   #3
PBFAB.COM
Senior Member
 
PBFAB.COM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Mesa,Az
Posts: 3,981
Re: porterbuilt's dropmember vs. other IFS's

The characteristics that set it apart from the other products (like SCOTI mentioned) is that it is able to use your existing components, minus stock steering linkage and gear box; and that it will allow the frame to rest on the ground if the purchaser/installer decides to do so. This can be achieved through drop-spindle selection and tire diameter selection. Crossmember to ground clearance is increased dramatically... the framerails become the lowest part of the chassis.

It is designed to be used with tubular arms from Air Ride Technologies, but stock arms can be used (slight mod to lower arm... little trimming for mount clearance) and upgraded later if one would like. By using your stock components money spent on rebuilding bushings, ball joints, and brakes is not wasted.

I wanted to find an alternative to cuttin apart the frame and or crossmember to achieve a low/clearanced ride height, narrow up the track width, convert to rack and pinion steering, and keep larger heavier duty spindle/brakes, without having to spend a bundle... nothing existed, so I designed one, proto-typed it, and now produce it.
PBFAB.COM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2006, 05:32 PM   #4
Rydn2L0w
Active Member
 
Rydn2L0w's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Orlando, Fl.
Posts: 123
Re: porterbuilt's dropmember vs. other IFS's

Quote:
Originally Posted by porterbuilt
The characteristics that set it apart from the other products (like SCOTI mentioned) is that it is able to use your existing components, minus stock steering linkage and gear box; and that it will allow the frame to rest on the ground if the purchaser/installer decides to do so. This can be achieved through drop-spindle selection and tire diameter selection. Crossmember to ground clearance is increased dramatically... the framerails become the lowest part of the chassis.

It is designed to be used with tubular arms from Air Ride Technologies, but stock arms can be used (slight mod to lower arm... little trimming for mount clearance) and upgraded later if one would like. By using your stock components money spent on rebuilding bushings, ball joints, and brakes is not wasted.

I wanted to find an alternative to cuttin apart the frame and or crossmember to achieve a low/clearanced ride height, narrow up the track width, convert to rack and pinion steering, and keep larger heavier duty spindle/brakes, without having to spend a bundle... nothing existed, so I designed one, proto-typed it, and now produce it.
How much is your crossmember?
Rydn2L0w is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2006, 08:02 PM   #5
N2TRUX
Happy to be here
 
N2TRUX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 39,021
Re: porterbuilt's dropmember vs. other IFS's

So the Dropmember will allow you to "Lay Frame" without a Z? I understand that part of this is determined by what spindles are used as well as tire height.

For clarity purposes, with a 3" spindle, what height tire would allow you to lay frame at full air out?
__________________
Follow me on Facebook and Instagram @N2trux.com

Articles-

"Jake" the 84 to 74 crewcab

"Elwood" the77_Remix

85 GMC Sierra "Scarlett"

"Refining Sierra"
N2TRUX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2006, 08:08 PM   #6
PBFAB.COM
Senior Member
 
PBFAB.COM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Mesa,Az
Posts: 3,981
Re: porterbuilt's dropmember vs. other IFS's

Quote:
For clarity purposes, with a 3" spindle, what height tire would allow you to lay frame at full air out?

3" sindle and 29" tire diameter will allow it to "Lay Frame".

Last edited by N2TRUX; 07-30-2006 at 12:42 AM.
PBFAB.COM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2006, 08:20 PM   #7
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,071
Re: porterbuilt's dropmember vs. other IFS's

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rydn2L0w
How much is your crossmember?
More info . . ....
Quote:
Dropmember $1200 (comes with everything you need minus the following)
-Rack and Pinion (it must be Mustang II all years will bolt right up to the member) $250 (this can vary depending on what brand or style of rack you buy. Power or manual rack, close ratio, bla, bla, bla.)
-Steering Shaft and Linkage $300 (you can use 3 joints or only 2 by buying the "expensive" double u-joint for the column shaft end. An idler is needed either way)
-Bags $75-$100 each, depending on where you buy them
-Shocks $50-$75
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2006, 11:05 PM   #8
mac
Active Member
 
mac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 166
Re: porterbuilt's dropmember vs. other IFS's

Are there previous threads with pics or maybe an install blow by blow? I've seen your work mentioned before but never any pics or links and I'm interested too.
mac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2006, 12:39 AM   #9
PBFAB.COM
Senior Member
 
PBFAB.COM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Mesa,Az
Posts: 3,981
Re: porterbuilt's dropmember vs. other IFS's

Quote:
Originally Posted by mac
Are there previous threads with pics or maybe an install blow by blow? I've seen your work mentioned before but never any pics or links and I'm interested too.

There is a thread titled "Dropmember in a 69" here in the suspension forum. It shows an install with pics.
PBFAB.COM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2006, 12:43 AM   #10
N2TRUX
Happy to be here
 
N2TRUX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 39,021
Re: porterbuilt's dropmember vs. other IFS's

Quote:
Originally Posted by porterbuilt
3" sindle and 29" tire diameter will allow it to "Lay Frame".
That sure will save a lot of work versus Z-ing the frame and a sectioned x-member..
__________________
Follow me on Facebook and Instagram @N2trux.com

Articles-

"Jake" the 84 to 74 crewcab

"Elwood" the77_Remix

85 GMC Sierra "Scarlett"

"Refining Sierra"
N2TRUX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2006, 05:53 AM   #11
kyle4381
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: AZ
Posts: 416
Re: porterbuilt's dropmember vs. other IFS's

Nathan installed the Porterbuilt dropmember on my 4wd blazer, And its definitely low now..Great for those who want to convert to 2wd. With the fourwheel drive frame you don't need drop spindles to lay it on the ground.
Attached Images
 
kyle4381 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2006, 09:21 AM   #12
mac
Active Member
 
mac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 166
Re: porterbuilt's dropmember vs. other IFS's

PB - thanx for the thread direction. The pics and your patience with us is appreciated. Your "dropmember" is by far the best deal for a frontend set-up I've seen. Me likes.

Do you have 'em on the shelf or are they each made to order? If you make to order, whats the lead time? How about shipping to 99216. (They have to be heavy as h#ll.)

Do you take "PAYPAL" or card over the phone ?

Mac
mac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2006, 10:05 AM   #13
Rokcrln
Senior Member
 
Rokcrln's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Winters Ca. 95694
Posts: 4,843
Re: porterbuilt's dropmember vs. other IFS's

Also keep in mind that except for the C notch for the rack this is a bolt in kit. Most others require alot of welding and fab work. That being said if you do not weld you can install this kit your self and cut for the rack and then take the truck to a local shop and have them weld in just the C notch cups and you are on your way. If I decide to alter my 70 2wd blazer this is the only way I will go.

Kevin
LFD Inc.
Rokcrln is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2006, 01:16 PM   #14
XXL
Seņor Member
 
XXL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Edge of the world
Posts: 5,367
Re: porterbuilt's dropmember vs. other IFS's

It appears that PB is correcting for the rearward pitch the suspension takes when dropped as a natural effect of the front end's KPI. Is this correct? If yes, how far forward did you move the arms? And did you keep the stock 4° or did you change that as well?
Attached Images
 
XXL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2006, 01:18 PM   #15
XXL
Seņor Member
 
XXL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Edge of the world
Posts: 5,367
Re: porterbuilt's dropmember vs. other IFS's

Quote:
Originally Posted by XXL
It appears that PB is correcting for the rearward pitch the suspension takes when dropped as a natural effect of the front end's KPI. Is this correct? If yes, how far forward did you move the arms? And did you keep the stock 4° or did you change that as well?
BTW, the above line is intended to show the spindle-to-fender opening alignment. The actual KPI runs the other direction
XXL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2006, 01:41 PM   #16
nwmod39
Registered User
 
nwmod39's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: spokane, washington
Posts: 302
Re: porterbuilt's dropmember vs. other IFS's

Quote:
Originally Posted by mac
PB - thanx for the thread direction. The pics and your patience with us is appreciated. Your "dropmember" is by far the best deal for a frontend set-up I've seen. Me likes.

Do you have 'em on the shelf or are they each made to order? If you make to order, whats the lead time? How about shipping to 99216. (They have to be heavy as h#ll.)

Do you take "PAYPAL" or card over the phone ?

Mac

mac, you live in my neck of the woods. 99206 here. pm me if you go eith this setup as i would love to lend a hand if you need it.
i am doing an 80 c-10 and have been eyeballing pb's setup.

let me know.
steve
__________________
1980 c-10: under destruction

http://photobucket.com/albums/c372/nwmod39/
nwmod39 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2006, 03:48 PM   #17
PBFAB.COM
Senior Member
 
PBFAB.COM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Mesa,Az
Posts: 3,981
Re: porterbuilt's dropmember vs. other IFS's

Quote:
Originally Posted by XXL
It appears that PB is correcting for the rearward pitch the suspension takes when dropped as a natural effect of the front end's KPI. Is this correct? If yes, how far forward did you move the arms? And did you keep the stock 4° or did you change that as well?

XXL- I was wondering when you would photoshop one of my pics!
You are correct... I wanted to compensate for the rearward pitch the stock geometry produces so I made a couple of changes. I moved the Axle centerline forward one inch and changed the anti-dive angle built into the stock geometry, thus keeping the centerline where I think it should be. It also keeps those large diameter wheel/tire combos out of the firewall at full dump. The KPI or steering axis inclination was slightly increased from the stock 4 degrees.
PBFAB.COM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2006, 04:28 PM   #18
PBFAB.COM
Senior Member
 
PBFAB.COM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Mesa,Az
Posts: 3,981
Re: porterbuilt's dropmember vs. other IFS's

Quote:
Originally Posted by mac
PB - thanx for the thread direction. The pics and your patience with us is appreciated. Your "dropmember" is by far the best deal for a frontend set-up I've seen. Me likes.

Do you have 'em on the shelf or are they each made to order? If you make to order, whats the lead time? How about shipping to 99216. (They have to be heavy as h#ll.)

Do you take "PAYPAL" or card over the phone ?

Mac

Mac- No need to thank me for my "patience"... thank my wife for teaching me!

I currently don not stock them on my "shelf", but have all materials on hand, and build them as they are ordered. Lead time is about a week and a half. I will have to check on the shipping... It is heavy!

I do not accept PAYPAL but can take a card over the phone (No AMEX).
PBFAB.COM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2006, 10:52 AM   #19
XXL
Seņor Member
 
XXL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Edge of the world
Posts: 5,367
Re: porterbuilt's dropmember vs. other IFS's

Quote:
Originally Posted by porterbuilt
XXL- I was wondering when you would photoshop one of my pics!
Hey, it's not a real pshop until I work in a bottle of
XXL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2007, 06:43 PM   #20
Nwar
Registered User
 
Nwar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1
Re: porterbuilt's dropmember vs. other IFS's

What are the specs when using coil springs instead of bags? At what rate would I need to have moderate drop and no frame lay??
Nwar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2007, 12:59 AM   #21
PBFAB.COM
Senior Member
 
PBFAB.COM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Mesa,Az
Posts: 3,981
Re: porterbuilt's dropmember vs. other IFS's

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nwar View Post
What are the specs when using coil springs instead of bags? At what rate would I need to have moderate drop and no frame lay??
The Dropmember is designed to be used with an airspring (bag) and not a steel coil spring. At one time I had looked into designing/building a kit that would allow the use of a steel coil spring... but it doesn't look like that will be an alternative. If the idea of an air suspension, and associated cost of such, make it undesireable, I would recommend running the bags with a schrader valve. This will allow the truck to remain at a "static" height, give the benefits of an air suspended ride quality, and allow the option of going with an adjustable system down the road. There really is no drawback to running an air spring instead of a steel coil.

As for ride height... if you're running a 27" tall tire (a typical "20" will be anywhere between 27" and 28" tall) the Dropmember will give you a ride height around 6.5" inches with a stock spindle. The ride height can be adjusted a little by increasing or decreasing the air pressure in the bag.

The airbag is designed and recommended to be used at a specified height and pressure... typically there is an inch or so of lee-way in the bag's recommended ride height. Since the bag is levered on the lower control arm, this inch of leeway becomes 2 or so inches at the spindle height. So there is some adjustment that can be made without sacrificing ride quality or recommended specs of the air bag.
__________________
www.PorterbuiltFabrication.com

Phone: 480-297-2621

E-mail: sales@pbfab.com


Find us on FaceBook under Porterbuilt Fabrication

Specializing in Chassis and Suspension Components for your Classic Chevrolet Truck.

We offer components from the following manufacturers:

Porterbuilt
Accuair
Ridetech (Air Ride Technologies)
Air Lift
Wilwood
Intro
Unisteer
ECE
Gotta Show
Air Lift
Borgeson
CPP


Supporting this forum since 2003!
PBFAB.COM is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com