|
Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
07-05-2007, 10:40 PM
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
 Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: KINGSPORT,TN.
Posts: 3,035
|
Edelbrock 2101alum. Intake Verses Stock Q-jet Manifold
Anybody Know If It Would Be Worth Swapping Out The Stock Q-jet 4 Bbl Manifold For My New Edelbrock # 2101 Aluminum Intake ? The Carb & Choke All Switch Over Nicely. My Engine Is A S.b. 383, 10.1 Compression, Dart 2.02x1.60 Heads, Rv Cam, Balanced Etc. Just Wondering If Its Worth The Trouble. I Do Think I,am Gonna Install One Of Those Dual Inlet Repro Factory H/p Air Cleaners Though And A Set Of 2 1/2" Ramhorns And A 1 Extra Quart Oil Pan.
Bob
__________________
I BELIEVE IN JOHN 3:16 |
|
|
|
07-05-2007, 10:43 PM
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Bakersfield,CA
Posts: 7,893
|
Re: Edelbrock 2101alum. Intake Verses Stock Q-jet Manifold
i dont know any specs but my guess would be that the eddy mani would be better than the stock one, lighter for sure if nothing else
__________________
-steven Alte Seele S.S. "Allison" '72 C/10 LWB 350SB/TH350 - DD PITBULL IS NOT A CRIME |
|
|
|
|
07-05-2007, 10:53 PM
|
#3 |
|
Account Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Monroe, WA
Posts: 3,815
|
Re: Edelbrock 2101alum. Intake Verses Stock Q-jet Manifold
I have to think the flow is better just because the runners aren't as flat - it's a straighter shot to the intake port.
|
|
|
|
|
07-05-2007, 10:56 PM
|
#4 |
|
Official Site Guitar Shredder
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Oz
Posts: 3,955
|
Re: Edelbrock 2101alum. Intake Verses Stock Q-jet Manifold
|
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Linear Mode
