The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Suspension

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-27-2007, 09:35 AM   #1
5150
C10 Club Tennessee
 
5150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: White House, TN 37188
Posts: 8,281
Thinking of running bags in the rear only

Hey guys,

Thinking of running just bags in the rear of my 2wd blazer. I have all the parts for a 4/6 drop, but was thinking this maybe a better option in the rear.

Can anybody tell me what I need(parts list). No compressor or anything. Probably try to mount the tank somewhere along the frame.

Thanks, I appreciate the info.
__________________
Bryan

www.gmtruckshow.com

Project "Andes"-Halen's First Truck

Project: Patina Burb

for he is God’s servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for he does not bear the sword in vain. For he is the servant of God, an avenger who carries out God’s wrath on the wrongdoer. Romans 13:4
5150 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2007, 10:14 AM   #2
72 Cheyenne402
Registered User
 
72 Cheyenne402's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 581
Re: Thinking of running bags in the rear only

I am going to do the same thing and am trying to determine all the parts needed. This information came from another fellow board member

"Swapping to manual fill bags will get you where you want so why not bags? You're going to go through the effort of swapping springs anyway.... installing a couple of bags isn't much more work.

From SuicideDoors site:
255c 2500# Firestone air bags @ $70ea x 2 = 140
25ft 1/4" Reinforced DOT air line @ $6
90° elbow fittings @ $5ea x 2 = 10
Schrader fittings @ $5ea x 2 = 10

Grand total for everything = $166
Price for 5" drop springs from board vendor GMC Pauls = $115

$51 difference to get that 7" drop & still tow a load.....

I ran them that way for almost 3yrs before installing a tank/compressor w/controls. I've added more again. The front has bags now & I switched to Slams (I thought I would try them out). I also re-engineered a couple of things on the suspension to work a little better.

As far as pics.... there's really not much to it. Bags in place of rear coils & 2 airlines running down the framerails to the bumper where I mounted the 2 schrader valves (they were installed behind my flip-up license plate)."
__________________
1972 Cheyenne 402 LWB
2005 Silverado X-Cab 5.3L
2004 John Deere L120 20HP B&S
72 Cheyenne402 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2007, 11:57 AM   #3
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,064
Re: Thinking of running bags in the rear only

Quote:
Originally Posted by 72 Cheyenne402 View Post
I am going to do the same thing and am trying to determine all the parts needed. This information came from another fellow board member

"Swapping to manual fill bags will get you where you want so why not bags? You're going to go through the effort of swapping springs anyway.... installing a couple of bags isn't much more work.

From SuicideDoors site:
255c 2500# Firestone air bags @ $70ea x 2 = 140
25ft 1/4" Reinforced DOT air line @ $6
90° elbow fittings @ $5ea x 2 = 10
Schrader fittings @ $5ea x 2 = 10

Grand total for everything = $166
Price for 5" drop springs from board vendor GMC Pauls = $115

$51 difference to get that 7" drop & still tow a load.....

I ran them that way for almost 3yrs before installing a tank/compressor w/controls. I've added more again. The front has bags now & I switched to Slams (I thought I would try them out). I also re-engineered a couple of things on the suspension to work a little better.

As far as pics.... there's really not much to it. Bags in place of rear coils & 2 airlines running down the framerails to the bumper where I mounted the 2 schrader valves (they were installed behind my flip-up license plate)."
Dang.... that guy sure seems smart . I can post some pics of the bags mounted but like was stated, there really isn't much to see.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2007, 12:27 PM   #4
jamis
F.A.S.T. president
 
jamis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,883
Re: Thinking of running bags in the rear only

I asked the question once and Scoti told me the same. Still havent done it, its too freeking hot now to work on my project, but as soon as it cools off a bit thats one of the things on the TO DO LIST.
__________________
F.A.S.T. President and Founder
Fabricators for the Advancement of Sawsall Technology


"A fear of the Sawsall is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity." ~Sigmund Freud, "General Introduction to Psychoanalysis"
jamis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2007, 12:41 PM   #5
5150
C10 Club Tennessee
 
5150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: White House, TN 37188
Posts: 8,281
Re: Thinking of running bags in the rear only

Thanks guys, and Scoti I'd appreciate the pics.

By the way, what is the part number for the elbows and the schrader valves?
__________________
Bryan

www.gmtruckshow.com

Project "Andes"-Halen's First Truck

Project: Patina Burb

for he is God’s servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for he does not bear the sword in vain. For he is the servant of God, an avenger who carries out God’s wrath on the wrongdoer. Romans 13:4

Last edited by 5150; 07-27-2007 at 12:48 PM.
5150 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2007, 02:30 PM   #6
gringoloco
A guy with a truck
 
gringoloco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Germany, for now
Posts: 5,921
Re: Thinking of running bags in the rear only

Firestone Air line service kit
__________________
-Chris

Instagram _elgringoloco_

'70 Short-Wide How to: Ruin a perfectly good C10
‘70 Blazer ConversionHow To: Ruin a Perfectly Good 4wd
'72 Highlander How To: Ruin a Perfectly Good K/5 (SOLD)
'72 Blazer 2WD How to: Ruin a perfectly good Blazer (SOLD)
'05 Yukon Daily Driven (not so stock) Yukon (SOLD)
‘07 Yukon Denali (daily)

Members met list: SCOTI, darkhorse970, 67cheby, 67cheby'sGirl, klmore, porterbuilt, n2billet, Fastrucken, classicchev, Col Clank, GSFMECH, HuggerCST, Spray-Bomb, BACKYARD88, 5150, fine69, fatbass, smbrouss70, 65StreetCruiser, GAc10boy
gringoloco is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2007, 02:42 PM   #7
5150
C10 Club Tennessee
 
5150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: White House, TN 37188
Posts: 8,281
Re: Thinking of running bags in the rear only

Can that be found from Suicide Doors or did you get it somewhere else?
__________________
Bryan

www.gmtruckshow.com

Project "Andes"-Halen's First Truck

Project: Patina Burb

for he is God’s servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for he does not bear the sword in vain. For he is the servant of God, an avenger who carries out God’s wrath on the wrongdoer. Romans 13:4
5150 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2007, 02:56 PM   #8
72 Cheyenne402
Registered User
 
72 Cheyenne402's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 581
Re: Thinking of running bags in the rear only

Quote:
Originally Posted by SCOTI View Post
Dang.... that guy sure seems smart . I can post some pics of the bags mounted but like was stated, there really isn't much to see.
Scoti,
Sorry I didn't associate you with this information I actually have a copy of it on my desktop at work in a word file. I was trying to get out of there and head on my vacation this morning and posted it the information quick.

I also thing I'm going to run a compressor. Would I need a tank for the rear if that is all I plan on bagging or should I run a tank as well?
__________________
1972 Cheyenne 402 LWB
2005 Silverado X-Cab 5.3L
2004 John Deere L120 20HP B&S

Last edited by 72 Cheyenne402; 07-27-2007 at 02:57 PM.
72 Cheyenne402 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2007, 04:00 PM   #9
gringoloco
A guy with a truck
 
gringoloco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Germany, for now
Posts: 5,921
Re: Thinking of running bags in the rear only

Quote:
Originally Posted by 5150 Artist formerly known as yellow69 View Post
Can that be found from Suicide Doors or did you get it somewhere else?
Cheapest place I've found it:http://www.suspensionconnection.com
__________________
-Chris

Instagram _elgringoloco_

'70 Short-Wide How to: Ruin a perfectly good C10
‘70 Blazer ConversionHow To: Ruin a Perfectly Good 4wd
'72 Highlander How To: Ruin a Perfectly Good K/5 (SOLD)
'72 Blazer 2WD How to: Ruin a perfectly good Blazer (SOLD)
'05 Yukon Daily Driven (not so stock) Yukon (SOLD)
‘07 Yukon Denali (daily)

Members met list: SCOTI, darkhorse970, 67cheby, 67cheby'sGirl, klmore, porterbuilt, n2billet, Fastrucken, classicchev, Col Clank, GSFMECH, HuggerCST, Spray-Bomb, BACKYARD88, 5150, fine69, fatbass, smbrouss70, 65StreetCruiser, GAc10boy
gringoloco is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2007, 08:23 PM   #10
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,064
Re: Thinking of running bags in the rear only

Quote:
Originally Posted by 72 Cheyenne402 View Post
Scoti,
Sorry I didn't associate you with this information I actually have a copy of it on my desktop at work in a word file. I was trying to get out of there and head on my vacation this morning and posted it the information quick.

I also thing I'm going to run a compressor. Would I need a tank for the rear if that is all I plan on bagging or should I run a tank as well?
I know they sell kits for 'helper' bags (air over leaf) that you can get away w/not using a tank but those bags are tapered-sleeve bag vs. a dbl convoluted bag which is what 6X~72's need out back. My best advice would be to contact ART & seek their input. I'm guessing you could get away w/just the comp & no tank but it would be good to ask those that do this for a living.

I used the schrader set-up for quite a while (2+yrs). For my limited adjustments @ that time, they worked fine..... but switching to the comp/tank made it soooooo much easier when I did want to adjust ride height. If you can spare the coin, do the tank/comp.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2007, 08:33 AM   #11
72 Cheyenne402
Registered User
 
72 Cheyenne402's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 581
Re: Thinking of running bags in the rear only

Quote:
Originally Posted by SCOTI View Post
I know they sell kits for 'helper' bags (air over leaf) that you can get away w/not using a tank but those bags are tapered-sleeve bag vs. a dbl convoluted bag which is what 6X~72's need out back. My best advice would be to contact ART & seek their input. I'm guessing you could get away w/just the comp & no tank but it would be good to ask those that do this for a living.

I used the schrader set-up for quite a while (2+yrs). For my limited adjustments @ that time, they worked fine..... but switching to the comp/tank made it soooooo much easier when I did want to adjust ride height. If you can spare the coin, do the tank/comp.
I have decided to do the tank and compressor so I woulnd be set up for future expansion. tanks are reasonible and I am not sure which compressor to go with.
__________________
1972 Cheyenne 402 LWB
2005 Silverado X-Cab 5.3L
2004 John Deere L120 20HP B&S
72 Cheyenne402 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2007, 11:13 AM   #12
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,064
Re: Thinking of running bags in the rear only

Quote:
Originally Posted by 72 Cheyenne402 View Post
I have decided to do the tank and compressor so I woulnd be set up for future expansion. tanks are reasonible and I am not sure which compressor to go with.
Everyone seems to love the Viairs (the 380c or 480c). I have had good experiences w/the 'old' standard Thomas brand comp's from ART.

From what I understand, the Thomases generate a little less noise vs. the other brands if that's important to you.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.

Last edited by SCOTI; 07-28-2007 at 11:14 AM.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2007, 07:37 PM   #13
5150
C10 Club Tennessee
 
5150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: White House, TN 37188
Posts: 8,281
Re: Thinking of running bags in the rear only

Hey guys,

I know that the 2500 bags were recommended in an earlier post, but will the 2600 bags fit??

The reason I ask is a buddy of mine who builds hot rods and a lot of mini trucks recommended the slam specialties:

http://www.*****************/SlamSpec...SinglePort.php
__________________
Bryan

www.gmtruckshow.com

Project "Andes"-Halen's First Truck

Project: Patina Burb

for he is God’s servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for he does not bear the sword in vain. For he is the servant of God, an avenger who carries out God’s wrath on the wrongdoer. Romans 13:4

Last edited by 5150; 07-31-2007 at 07:41 PM.
5150 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2007, 12:56 AM   #14
gringoloco
A guy with a truck
 
gringoloco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Germany, for now
Posts: 5,921
Re: Thinking of running bags in the rear only

Quote:
Originally Posted by 5150 Artist formerly known as yellow69 View Post
Hey guys,

I know that the 2500 bags were recommended in an earlier post, but will the 2600 bags fit??

The reason I ask is a buddy of mine who builds hot rods and a lot of mini trucks recommended the slam specialties:

http://www.*****************/SlamSpec...SinglePort.php
The 2600s will fit. *I think* the Firestones were mentioned merely for their price, as that was a budget bag setup. The Slams are only $5 more each and have an internal bumpstop and supposedly don't balloon. Lots of people here running Slam Specialties RE7s including me...
__________________
-Chris

Instagram _elgringoloco_

'70 Short-Wide How to: Ruin a perfectly good C10
‘70 Blazer ConversionHow To: Ruin a Perfectly Good 4wd
'72 Highlander How To: Ruin a Perfectly Good K/5 (SOLD)
'72 Blazer 2WD How to: Ruin a perfectly good Blazer (SOLD)
'05 Yukon Daily Driven (not so stock) Yukon (SOLD)
‘07 Yukon Denali (daily)

Members met list: SCOTI, darkhorse970, 67cheby, 67cheby'sGirl, klmore, porterbuilt, n2billet, Fastrucken, classicchev, Col Clank, GSFMECH, HuggerCST, Spray-Bomb, BACKYARD88, 5150, fine69, fatbass, smbrouss70, 65StreetCruiser, GAc10boy
gringoloco is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2007, 01:28 AM   #15
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,064
Re: Thinking of running bags in the rear only

Quote:
Originally Posted by gringoloco View Post
The 2600s will fit. *I think* the Firestones were mentioned merely for their price, as that was a budget bag setup. The Slams are only $5 more each and have an internal bumpstop and supposedly don't balloon. Lots of people here running Slam Specialties RE7s including me...
I used the larger 2600# Stones in the rear & have since swapped in Slams RE-6's. RE-7's would work just as well.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2007, 03:39 AM   #16
randyjohn
Registered User
 
randyjohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: grand forks, nd
Posts: 154
Re: Thinking of running bags in the rear only

i have a couple of ?'s
1. is the 6" drop with just bags or with a notch?
2. what would be the differences between 1/2 and 3/4 ton as far as mounting and size of bags?
__________________
It's peanut butter jelly time.

'74 GMC 3/4 TON 2WD LB
randyjohn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2007, 05:57 PM   #17
5150
C10 Club Tennessee
 
5150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: White House, TN 37188
Posts: 8,281
Re: Thinking of running bags in the rear only

Hey Gringo, where did you get those RE7's I'm only seeing the RE200's on suicide doors??? If the ones that I posted a link for will work I'll get them, but want to make sure those will work.
__________________
Bryan

www.gmtruckshow.com

Project "Andes"-Halen's First Truck

Project: Patina Burb

for he is God’s servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for he does not bear the sword in vain. For he is the servant of God, an avenger who carries out God’s wrath on the wrongdoer. Romans 13:4

Last edited by 5150; 08-01-2007 at 05:58 PM.
5150 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2007, 06:33 PM   #18
gringoloco
A guy with a truck
 
gringoloco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Germany, for now
Posts: 5,921
Re: Thinking of running bags in the rear only

Quote:
Originally Posted by 5150 Artist formerly known as yellow69 View Post
Hey Gringo, where did you get those RE7's I'm only seeing the RE200's on suicide doors??? If the ones that I posted a link for will work I'll get them, but want to make sure those will work.
That's them. Look to the right and there's a pull down menu for diameter. Get the 7 inch. Some people say 6" for the pickups due to less weight than say, a Blazer. Either one will be fine, but if you ever haul anything, you'll want the 7s.

-Chris
__________________
-Chris

Instagram _elgringoloco_

'70 Short-Wide How to: Ruin a perfectly good C10
‘70 Blazer ConversionHow To: Ruin a Perfectly Good 4wd
'72 Highlander How To: Ruin a Perfectly Good K/5 (SOLD)
'72 Blazer 2WD How to: Ruin a perfectly good Blazer (SOLD)
'05 Yukon Daily Driven (not so stock) Yukon (SOLD)
‘07 Yukon Denali (daily)

Members met list: SCOTI, darkhorse970, 67cheby, 67cheby'sGirl, klmore, porterbuilt, n2billet, Fastrucken, classicchev, Col Clank, GSFMECH, HuggerCST, Spray-Bomb, BACKYARD88, 5150, fine69, fatbass, smbrouss70, 65StreetCruiser, GAc10boy
gringoloco is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2007, 07:41 AM   #19
bama51
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Madison, AL
Posts: 140
Re: Thinking of running bags in the rear only

If I order the 7s and the airline kit mentioned above, will that cover everything or do I need some mounting adapters or something? Also, If I decide to go all-out with tank, compressor, etc. will I be able to use this setup and just add the other components? Thanks.
bama51 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2007, 08:25 AM   #20
gringoloco
A guy with a truck
 
gringoloco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Germany, for now
Posts: 5,921
Re: Thinking of running bags in the rear only

Quote:
Originally Posted by bama51 View Post
If I order the 7s and the airline kit mentioned above, will that cover everything or do I need some mounting adapters or something? Also, If I decide to go all-out with tank, compressor, etc. will I be able to use this setup and just add the other components? Thanks.
No mounting adapters needed in the rear- just one long bolt through the trailing arm and two through the frame. You will also need a pair of adapter bushings to adapt the 1/4"npt fittings to the 1/2"npt bag; they are ~$2 at home Depot/Lowe's. Check out the FAQ by Mr.Shelley on airbag mounting for pictures...
__________________
-Chris

Instagram _elgringoloco_

'70 Short-Wide How to: Ruin a perfectly good C10
‘70 Blazer ConversionHow To: Ruin a Perfectly Good 4wd
'72 Highlander How To: Ruin a Perfectly Good K/5 (SOLD)
'72 Blazer 2WD How to: Ruin a perfectly good Blazer (SOLD)
'05 Yukon Daily Driven (not so stock) Yukon (SOLD)
‘07 Yukon Denali (daily)

Members met list: SCOTI, darkhorse970, 67cheby, 67cheby'sGirl, klmore, porterbuilt, n2billet, Fastrucken, classicchev, Col Clank, GSFMECH, HuggerCST, Spray-Bomb, BACKYARD88, 5150, fine69, fatbass, smbrouss70, 65StreetCruiser, GAc10boy
gringoloco is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com