Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
09-24-2007, 07:34 PM | #1 |
senior member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: fort macleod alberta
Posts: 2,770
|
stock VS tubular control arms question
Just wondering how much lower I would be if i went with tubular control arms and no cup as opposed to a cut down cup and a stock control arm? just wondering if anyone has any experience in this issue?
Jason
__________________
69 GMC bagged |
09-24-2007, 08:01 PM | #2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: TX
Posts: 499
|
Re: stock VS tubular control arms question
what year truck?
|
09-24-2007, 10:22 PM | #3 |
senior member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: fort macleod alberta
Posts: 2,770
|
Re: stock VS tubular control arms question
ya sorry bout that guess it would help its on my 69 GMC the one in my avatar
__________________
69 GMC bagged |
09-24-2007, 11:55 PM | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: TX
Posts: 499
|
Re: stock VS tubular control arms question
When I did the swap on my 86, it got me down about 1 inch lower. I was running 1 1/4 cups. I think I have some pictures:
|
09-25-2007, 12:10 AM | #5 |
senior member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: fort macleod alberta
Posts: 2,770
|
Re: stock VS tubular control arms question
any problems with rubbing with 1 1/4" cups?
__________________
69 GMC bagged |
09-25-2007, 12:28 AM | #6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: TX
Posts: 499
|
Re: stock VS tubular control arms question
|
10-15-2007, 09:50 AM | #7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 3,737
|
Re: stock VS tubular control arms question
would a larger cup require less beating? Where does the bag rub?
__________________
'72 2wd blazer, bagged w/ watts link & EDC '72 C10 "Lowered Farm Truck" STOLEN 5-18-11 '66 impala ht |
10-16-2007, 03:23 AM | #8 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 69
|
Re: stock VS tubular control arms question
whats the weight of those compared to stock? it remove much weight?
|
10-16-2007, 03:55 AM | #9 |
A guy with a truck
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Germany, for now
Posts: 5,921
|
Re: stock VS tubular control arms question
Taller cup=fewer clearance issues, but less drop. You will need to dent the area around the spring pocket, mostly on the shock side. '73-up arms have a shallower pocket that requires less clearancing and allows a shorter cup.
__________________
-Chris Instagram _elgringoloco_ '70 Short-Wide How to: Ruin a perfectly good C10 ‘70 Blazer ConversionHow To: Ruin a Perfectly Good 4wd '72 Highlander How To: Ruin a Perfectly Good K/5 (SOLD) '72 Blazer 2WD How to: Ruin a perfectly good Blazer (SOLD) '05 Yukon Daily Driven (not so stock) Yukon (SOLD) ‘07 Yukon Denali (daily) Members met list: SCOTI, darkhorse970, 67cheby, 67cheby'sGirl, klmore, porterbuilt, n2billet, Fastrucken, classicchev, Col Clank, GSFMECH, HuggerCST, Spray-Bomb, BACKYARD88, 5150, fine69, fatbass, smbrouss70, 65StreetCruiser, GAc10boy |
10-17-2007, 11:16 AM | #10 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 3,737
|
Re: stock VS tubular control arms question
If you change the lower arms to the "73 + style do you need to change the uppers as well?
__________________
'72 2wd blazer, bagged w/ watts link & EDC '72 C10 "Lowered Farm Truck" STOLEN 5-18-11 '66 impala ht |
10-17-2007, 11:18 AM | #11 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 3,737
|
Re: stock VS tubular control arms question
Are the arms the same for 3/4 ton trucks? 4x4?
__________________
'72 2wd blazer, bagged w/ watts link & EDC '72 C10 "Lowered Farm Truck" STOLEN 5-18-11 '66 impala ht |
10-17-2007, 12:05 PM | #12 |
Epoxy Primer Friendly
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: South of Houston TEXXXAS
Posts: 680
|
Re: stock VS tubular control arms question
I have some tube lowers for $150 you just need to make your own crosshafts and get bushings. Used them on the new arms we built. PM ME
|
10-17-2007, 01:44 PM | #13 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 3,737
|
Re: stock VS tubular control arms question
PM sent
__________________
'72 2wd blazer, bagged w/ watts link & EDC '72 C10 "Lowered Farm Truck" STOLEN 5-18-11 '66 impala ht |
10-19-2007, 12:56 PM | #14 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 3,737
|
Re: stock VS tubular control arms question
If you change the lower arms to the "73 + style do you need to change the uppers as well?
Are the arms the same for 3/4 ton trucks? 4x4? TTT, for unanswered questions.
__________________
'72 2wd blazer, bagged w/ watts link & EDC '72 C10 "Lowered Farm Truck" STOLEN 5-18-11 '66 impala ht |
10-19-2007, 02:59 PM | #15 |
A guy with a truck
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Germany, for now
Posts: 5,921
|
Re: stock VS tubular control arms question
Not necessarily. Might as well do them both IMO. 3/4 ton are the same as the early arms. You want late 1/2 ton arms.
__________________
-Chris Instagram _elgringoloco_ '70 Short-Wide How to: Ruin a perfectly good C10 ‘70 Blazer ConversionHow To: Ruin a Perfectly Good 4wd '72 Highlander How To: Ruin a Perfectly Good K/5 (SOLD) '72 Blazer 2WD How to: Ruin a perfectly good Blazer (SOLD) '05 Yukon Daily Driven (not so stock) Yukon (SOLD) ‘07 Yukon Denali (daily) Members met list: SCOTI, darkhorse970, 67cheby, 67cheby'sGirl, klmore, porterbuilt, n2billet, Fastrucken, classicchev, Col Clank, GSFMECH, HuggerCST, Spray-Bomb, BACKYARD88, 5150, fine69, fatbass, smbrouss70, 65StreetCruiser, GAc10boy |
Bookmarks |
|
|