Consumer Reports "1974 Buying Guide" and our trucks - The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network

**WorkinLonghorn** · 10-05-2007, 12:04 AM

Found this book the other day and looked up our trucks (it covers '69-72) to see their quality in first few years.

Here's data for the Six;

And the Eight;

Thought it was interesting.The Six did pretty good,but the Eight had some transmission and engine complaints.

whatnow123 · 10-05-2007, 12:26 AM

That's pretty cool, but what is the rating for the the empty, half and full dots?

**WorkinLonghorn** · 10-05-2007, 12:47 AM

Oh yeah,forgot to put that.

A Black dot is really a lot of problems reported,lower half of dot black;worse than average,blank dot;average.Bottom of dot blue=better than average and a blue dot means much fewer than average problems for that specific area,ie."engine,mechanical" or "steering",etc.

72highlander · 10-05-2007, 12:49 AM

corvette ranks highly

Ackattack · 10-05-2007, 12:52 AM

Kinda off the subject, but I hate consumer reports and their reports on vehicles. I think they're the number one reason why people continue to tought Japanese cars. Don't get me wrong the jap cars are good cars, but I think that many american cars are just as good, if not better than the jap cars. Yet consumer reports continues the stereo type japanese cars as super quality and then dog on the american cars. The other day I was looking through it and they they rated the New Tunda's "predicted reliability" as good or excellent...something like that. Then the "predicted reliability" of the new '07 chevy/gmc was "too new to tell" or something like that.

I'm sorry, but the new Tundra has a completly new engine. Yet the GM offerings essentially have the same engines as the previous body style.

This is just one example of there bias towards the Japanese cars. Just my opinion.

**WorkinLonghorn** · 10-05-2007, 09:19 AM

I hate them too. I've tried to follow their recommendations on a few things and they seem to ALWAYS get it wrong in the real world.The other thing is that they will recommend a product and when you try to buy it you find that nearly always that model was discontinued last year or something.

**WorkinLonghorn** · 10-05-2007, 09:22 AM

Quote:

corvette ranks highly

I noticed that.At least the brakes were good (in '69).

67ChevyRedneck · 10-05-2007, 09:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ackattack

Kinda off the subject, but I hate consumer reports and their reports on vehicles. I think they're the number one reason why people continue to tought Japanese cars. Don't get me wrong the jap cars are good cars, but I think that many american cars are just as good, if not better than the jap cars. Yet consumer reports continues the stereo type japanese cars as super quality and then dog on the american cars. The other day I was looking through it and they they rated the New Tunda's "predicted reliability" as good or excellent...something like that. Then the "predicted reliability" of the new '07 chevy/gmc was "too new to tell" or something like that.

I'm sorry, but the new Tundra has a completly new engine. Yet the GM offerings essentially have the same engines as the previous body style.

This is just one example of there bias towards the Japanese cars. Just my opinion.

I HATE CR as well. Look at the Matrix vs Vibe ratings... funny as hell, you'd never know they were the same car. The Pontiac version is rated as marginal while the Toyota version is a top pick.

I don't bother to read CR anymore. Waste of time. Looking at these ratings they didn't think too highly of our trucks either. They gave the straight sixes a horrible rating yet 40 years later there are many still running.

I have a new slogan for them:

Consumer Reports, improperly rating vehicles for 40 years and proud of it

AlienYouth · 10-05-2007, 09:42 AM

actually, corvette rates really low, look at the other page he posted : )

Orange · 10-05-2007, 09:56 AM

Corvette.

I love the newer 'Vettes, but those old ones sure weren't much to write home about. (In the way of their mechanical reliability, etc.)

DLB

Zonaman · 10-05-2007, 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 67ChevyRedneck

I HATE CR as well. Look at the Matrix vs Vibe ratings... funny as hell, you'd never know they were the same car. The Pontiac version is rated as marginal while the Toyota version is a top pick.

I don't bother to read CR anymore. Waste of time. Looking at these ratings they didn't think too highly of our trucks either. They gave the straight sixes a horrible rating yet 40 years later there are many still running.

I have a new slogan for them:

Consumer Reports, improperly rating vehicles for 40 years and proud of it

I'm glad to see I'm not the only one who feels this way! But then what do you expect from a guy like Ralph Nadar? He started it with Unsafe at Any Speed which slammed the Corvair out of existance. Meanwhile the VW, essentially the same car, gets a pass (at least for a while). They've had anti-American bias from day one!

67ChevyRedneck · 10-05-2007, 11:24 AM

My future father in law was a huge CR advocate a few years ago (been with my chick for 4 years) and he's also a toyota nut (bugs the hell out of me about it) but even he finally stopped buying CR after they bought SEVERAL new (and expensive) appliances that were highly rated that failed within a year of purchase.

Ackattack · 10-05-2007, 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 67ChevyRedneck

I HATE CR as well. Look at the Matrix vs Vibe ratings... funny as hell, you'd never know they were the same car. The Pontiac version is rated as marginal while the Toyota version is a top pick.

I don't bother to read CR anymore. Waste of time. Looking at these ratings they didn't think too highly of our trucks either. They gave the straight sixes a horrible rating yet 40 years later there are many still running.

I have a new slogan for them:

Consumer Reports, improperly rating vehicles for 40 years and proud of it

That's kinda funny and pathetic at the same time. And exactly proves my point.

10-05-2007, 12:04 AM	#1
WorkinLonghorn Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Studio City, Calif. Posts: 2,883	Consumer Reports "1974 Buying Guide" and our trucks Found this book the other day and looked up our trucks (it covers '69-72) to see their quality in first few years. Here's data for the Six; And the Eight; Thought it was interesting.The Six did pretty good,but the Eight had some transmission and engine complaints. __________________ '69 GMC C2500 Custom Camper, 8 1/2' bed, New GM 350, NP 435 Close Ratio 4spd. Trans., 3.73 Dana-60 open.Camper and Trailer wiring, PS, PB, AC, tach , three gas tanks, stereo speakers, 2nd owner, Work-Truck supreme. Last edited by WorkinLonghorn; 10-05-2007 at 12:06 AM.

10-05-2007, 12:26 AM	#2
whatnow123 Registered User Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Arizona Posts: 835	Re: Consumer Reports "1974 Buying Guide" and our trucks That's pretty cool, but what is the rating for the the empty, half and full dots? __________________ 67 Short Step, 355, 700R 4.11 posi rear, 4/6 drop Discs on all 4 corners. Build thread: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=219094

10-05-2007, 12:47 AM	#3
WorkinLonghorn Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Studio City, Calif. Posts: 2,883	Re: Consumer Reports "1974 Buying Guide" and our trucks Oh yeah,forgot to put that. A Black dot is really a lot of problems reported,lower half of dot black;worse than average,blank dot;average.Bottom of dot blue=better than average and a blue dot means much fewer than average problems for that specific area,ie."engine,mechanical" or "steering",etc. __________________ '69 GMC C2500 Custom Camper, 8 1/2' bed, New GM 350, NP 435 Close Ratio 4spd. Trans., 3.73 Dana-60 open.Camper and Trailer wiring, PS, PB, AC, tach , three gas tanks, stereo speakers, 2nd owner, Work-Truck supreme. Last edited by WorkinLonghorn; 10-05-2007 at 09:14 AM.

10-05-2007, 12:49 AM	#4
72highlander Sophomore Member Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: brownwood, tx Posts: 927	Re: Consumer Reports "1974 Buying Guide" and our trucks corvette ranks highly __________________ 1972 Chevrolet Highlander SWB 1972 Custom Deluxe 3/4 2WD 60k miles these trucks don't need vacuum gauges cause they don't suck! two wrongs don't make a right, but three rights do make a left all i want is a little more than i'll ever get it's better to be judged by 12 than to be carried by 6

10-05-2007, 12:52 AM	#5
Ackattack Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Valley Center KS Posts: 3,524	Re: Consumer Reports "1974 Buying Guide" and our trucks Kinda off the subject, but I hate consumer reports and their reports on vehicles. I think they're the number one reason why people continue to tought Japanese cars. Don't get me wrong the jap cars are good cars, but I think that many american cars are just as good, if not better than the jap cars. Yet consumer reports continues the stereo type japanese cars as super quality and then dog on the american cars. The other day I was looking through it and they they rated the New Tunda's "predicted reliability" as good or excellent...something like that. Then the "predicted reliability" of the new '07 chevy/gmc was "too new to tell" or something like that. I'm sorry, but the new Tundra has a completly new engine. Yet the GM offerings essentially have the same engines as the previous body style. This is just one example of there bias towards the Japanese cars. Just my opinion. __________________ Project Bruiser: 68 Pro-Touring C-10 5.3L / 4L60E Project Ironhide: 97 GMC Crew Cab 4x4 Cummins SOLD: '69 GMC 1/2T SWB TBI'd: Project No Buck Assembly Manual Index Sign up Thread!!! Factory Service Manual Index

10-05-2007, 09:19 AM	#6
WorkinLonghorn Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Studio City, Calif. Posts: 2,883	Re: Consumer Reports "1974 Buying Guide" and our trucks I hate them too. I've tried to follow their recommendations on a few things and they seem to ALWAYS get it wrong in the real world.The other thing is that they will recommend a product and when you try to buy it you find that nearly always that model was discontinued last year or something. __________________ '69 GMC C2500 Custom Camper, 8 1/2' bed, New GM 350, NP 435 Close Ratio 4spd. Trans., 3.73 Dana-60 open.Camper and Trailer wiring, PS, PB, AC, tach , three gas tanks, stereo speakers, 2nd owner, Work-Truck supreme.

10-05-2007, 09:42 AM	#9
AlienYouth Registered User Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Westminster, Maryland Posts: 411	Re: Consumer Reports "1974 Buying Guide" and our trucks actually, corvette rates really low, look at the other page he posted : ) __________________ Picturesss 71 C10 383/TH400 13.65 @ 99... 2.06 60' spinnin :/

10-05-2007, 09:56 AM	#10
Orange Licensed to Thrill! Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Northwest, GA Posts: 1,673	Re: Consumer Reports "1974 Buying Guide" and our trucks Corvette. I love the newer 'Vettes, but those old ones sure weren't much to write home about. (In the way of their mechanical reliability, etc.) DLB __________________ 1971 GMC.Lowered. Overdrive. Orange. Krue's excellent FAQ Index. Last edited by Orange; 10-05-2007 at 09:57 AM.

10-05-2007, 11:24 AM	#12
67ChevyRedneck Hittin E-Z Street on Mud Tires Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Greenville, SC Posts: 23,090	Re: Consumer Reports "1974 Buying Guide" and our trucks My future father in law was a huge CR advocate a few years ago (been with my chick for 4 years) and he's also a toyota nut (bugs the hell out of me about it) but even he finally stopped buying CR after they bought SEVERAL new (and expensive) appliances that were highly rated that failed within a year of purchase. __________________ Jesse James 1967 C10 SWB Stepside: 350/700R4/3.73 1965 Ford Mustang: 289/T5-5spd/3.25 Trac-Loc 1968 Pontiac Firebird: Project Fire Chicken! 2015 Silverado Double Cab 5.3L Z71 2001 Jeep Wrangler Sport 4.0L 5spd 2020 Chevrolet Equinox Premium 2.0L Turbo 2011 Mustang V6 ~ Wife's ride American Born, Country by the Grace of God 1967 CST Shop Truck Rebuild! My 1967 C-10 Build Thread My Vintage Air A/C Install Project "On a Dime" Trying my hand at Home Renovation! 1965 Mustang Modifications!



Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.