The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-28-2007, 10:03 PM   #1
eedgell
It's the air up here
 
eedgell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Western Colorado
Posts: 710
383 stroker,perfect for 67-72's?

Is the 383 stroker the perfect motor for our trucks? Does it replace the Big Block, and the other Small Block versions? With cam, and head options, as well as great rotating assemblys, is the block from a 350 sb all we need to make the perfect engine? I know there is more HP, and torque to be made with the Big Blocks, but when looking at performance, with mileage, is the "STROKER" all we need?
__________________
1971 cheyenne k10 4 speed np 205 454 BB factory a/c

Never drink down stream of the herd!

Eric
eedgell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2007, 10:10 PM   #2
BCOWANWHEELS
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: KINGSPORT,TN.
Posts: 3,035
Re: 383 stroker,perfect for 67-72's?

I LOVE MINE. it ran 16.79 @ 80 mph in the quarter in my 1972 lwb. heres my combination.
350 block, 400 crank & rods, srp 10-1 pistons,balanced, dart 2 iron heads w/2.02-1.60 stainless valves, double roller chain, roller rockers, towing cam, hei, q-jet with iron intake, p/s, p/b, a/c, 350 turbo w/shift kit, 3.08 gears w/posi. also get 17-18 mpg if i drive it nice.
bob
__________________
I BELIEVE IN JOHN 3:16
BCOWANWHEELS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2007, 10:14 PM   #3
68Stepbed
Registered User
 
68Stepbed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 10-Uh-See
Posts: 5,609
Re: 383 stroker,perfect for 67-72's?

The best point of a 383 is BB type power in a SB package and a SB price. There are plenty of packages and options available to build a 383 for just a little more $ than a stout 350 and still less dough than building a BB. Big blocks are still the best for all out power, but a 383 gives you plenty of power for a budget.

This is just my opinion. Others may have more to say.
__________________
Matt

68 C10 stepside, LS1/700R4, TCI Engineering suspension system
68Stepbed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2007, 10:31 PM   #4
Sport/Truck
Sierra Grande Club
 
Sport/Truck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New Mexico USA
Posts: 2,433
Re: 383 stroker,perfect for 67-72's?

I think the stroker is more appealing with today’s gas prices. I like the fact that there is a modern version (ie balanced assey etc) that takes out allot of the “work” in building one.
s/t
__________________
1971 GMC Sierra Grande, 1/2 ton short wide, original 4 bolt 010 020 block & heads. (matching #'s). 383 stroker, SMI q jet 750 cfm, Lunati Voodoo 60102 cam, Scorpion roller rockers, Spin Tech pro street mufflers with X pipe.
Sport/Truck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2007, 11:03 PM   #5
67_C-30
I have a radical idea!
 
67_C-30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sweet Home Alabama!
Posts: 6,513
Re: 383 stroker,perfect for 67-72's?

My car hauler came with a 396, and I ran it for years. I even freshened it up when I first got the truck and it was a great engine. I haul heavy loads and when I have bought junkyards, etc. the is literally cranked in the morning, ran til lunch, given a 30 min beather, and ran to dusk. The truck byself weighs 8500# unloaded.

I have been running 383 in my racecar since 1997, but I had never built a mild one for street use. About a year and half ago the 396 had got tired again, and I had a left over rotating assembly with a steel crank, KB flat tops and 5.7" SIR rods that I had planned to put in a street strip engine. I had a 350 4 bolt block punched .030", and built one for the car hauler with a COMP Xtreme 4X4 cam, a set of rebuilt 441 heads, and a 600 Holley. The truck has more power than the 396 ever did, and is way better on fuel. I got 6-7 MPG with 396 loaded, and I've got as good as 11 with the 383. It runs cooler and as heavy as this truck is, I could definitely tell a big difference w/o the heavy BBC over the front wheels on wet, slippery dirt roads going into some of the yards I go to in BFE. It used to push real when I tried to turn on those surfaces, but it better with SBC. I definitely don't plan on going back to the gas hogging big block.
__________________
'67 C-30 Dually Pickup 6.2 Turbo Diesel, NP435
‘72 C-10 SWB , 350 4bbl, TH350
'69 C-10 SWB , 250 L6, 3 OTT
'69 GMC C3500, dump truck, 351 V6, NP435
'84 M1009 CUCV Military Blazer

67 C-30 Turbodiesel build thread
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=254096

My trucks
http://s226.photobucket.com/albums/d...ediafilter=all

Member of the 1-Ton Club!
67_C-30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2007, 02:46 AM   #6
wibilly
Senior Member
 
wibilly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: northwestern wi
Posts: 2,111
Re: 383 stroker,perfect for 67-72's?

i thought about it but why not have it all. i'm going with a 406 sbc
__________________
common sense isn't so common anymore
wibilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2007, 08:42 AM   #7
67_C-30
I have a radical idea!
 
67_C-30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sweet Home Alabama!
Posts: 6,513
Re: 383 stroker,perfect for 67-72's?

Quote:
Originally Posted by wibilly View Post
i thought about it but why not have it all. i'm going with a 406 sbc
406's do not cool as good as 383's, especially in the application that I'm using it in. That's why GM never put a 400 in a medium or heavy duty application. They do make good street engines, but they are getting harder to find.
__________________
'67 C-30 Dually Pickup 6.2 Turbo Diesel, NP435
‘72 C-10 SWB , 350 4bbl, TH350
'69 C-10 SWB , 250 L6, 3 OTT
'69 GMC C3500, dump truck, 351 V6, NP435
'84 M1009 CUCV Military Blazer

67 C-30 Turbodiesel build thread
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=254096

My trucks
http://s226.photobucket.com/albums/d...ediafilter=all

Member of the 1-Ton Club!
67_C-30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2007, 02:40 PM   #8
prg machine
Registered User
 
prg machine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: oregon
Posts: 1,069
Re: 383 stroker,perfect for 67-72's?

Built 383 from Lindvig Machine: Roller Crane cam and rockers 1.6 on intake and 2.02 intake valves. Balanced and everything to a fully assembled long block cost me 3,000. Not too bad. Putting Edelbrock air gap manifold on , the Performer not the RPM style. Edelbrock 750 carb 6Al box and billet distributor, long tube Hedman Elites. MOUSE
prg machine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2007, 03:58 PM   #9
Billla
Account Suspended
 
Billla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Monroe, WA
Posts: 3,814
Re: 383 stroker,perfect for 67-72's?

Perfect is a really strong word It's the best reasonably priced SBC package on the planet for anyone, and given the need for low- and mid-range torque in our trucks I can't think of a better all-around engine.
Billla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2007, 09:04 PM   #10
eedgell
It's the air up here
 
eedgell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Western Colorado
Posts: 710
Re: 383 stroker,perfect for 67-72's?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billla View Post
Perfect is a really strong word It's the best reasonably priced SBC package on the planet for anyone, and given the need for low- and mid-range torque in our trucks I can't think of a better all-around engine.
If not perfect. Then it is the engine GM should have built.
__________________
1971 cheyenne k10 4 speed np 205 454 BB factory a/c

Never drink down stream of the herd!

Eric
eedgell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2007, 10:22 PM   #11
BCOWANWHEELS
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: KINGSPORT,TN.
Posts: 3,035
Re: 383 stroker,perfect for 67-72's?

A 400 with 5.7 rods does good also
__________________
I BELIEVE IN JOHN 3:16
BCOWANWHEELS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2007, 11:48 PM   #12
BarryB
Senior Member
 
BarryB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Blountville, Tn.
Posts: 3,904
Re: 383 stroker,perfect for 67-72's?

I am building a 383 for my truck. I was making over 400 h.p. before I decided to make mine a stroker. I am hoping to retain the HP but increase my torque by a considerable amount. Making burnouts alot easier.
__________________
*We could learn a lot from crayons... Some are sharp; some are pretty;and some are dull. Some have weird names; and all are different colours;but they all have to live in the same box.

* You may be only one person in the world, But you may also be the world to one person.

* Some mistakes are too much fun to only make once.

Two rules in life.
1. Never sweat the small stuff!
2. Everything is small stuff!
BarryB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2007, 12:15 AM   #13
Deuce
Registered User
 
Deuce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Calgary, Alberta,Canada
Posts: 1,595
Re: 383 stroker,perfect for 67-72's?

Quote:
Originally Posted by BCOWANWHEELS View Post
A 400 with 5.7 rods does good also
377. Thats what I'm building next.
__________________
I know what your thinking.......I have ESPN.

Sometimes it's easier to do things the hard way.

Fesler Built 1968 Chevy C10....Must resist the urge to mess with it!!
Deuce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2007, 01:22 AM   #14
wibilly
Senior Member
 
wibilly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: northwestern wi
Posts: 2,111
Re: 383 stroker,perfect for 67-72's?

duece, your thinking a 350 crank as well, my 406 has 5.7"rods as well
__________________
common sense isn't so common anymore
wibilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2007, 02:59 AM   #15
texanidiot25
Eat My Rust
 
texanidiot25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Cypress, Texas
Posts: 3,362
Re: 383 stroker,perfect for 67-72's?

Another, interesting idea is from the guys whom I bought my motor from. One of their motors was a 383 stroker, and bored out to 396. Didnt ask about their philosphy about it, but its food for thought:


texanidiot25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2007, 08:44 AM   #16
Billla
Account Suspended
 
Billla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Monroe, WA
Posts: 3,814
Re: 383 stroker,perfect for 67-72's?

A 396 stroker is significantly more expensive than a 383; the cranks are almost exclusively forged and require much more clearancing, a tighter ring stack on the pistons and typically a small-base-circle cam.
Billla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2007, 08:50 AM   #17
Boog
laying low
 
Boog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Searcy, Ark. USA
Posts: 13,535
Re: 383 stroker,perfect for 67-72's?

A 396 small block will have 'em scratchin their heads though.
__________________
Boog
69 Chevy stepside, 358/T350, 4.11 posi, 4.5/4 drop, rallys, poboy driver
primer is finer
91 Chevy sportside, Tahoe, Yukon & GMC Crewcab All GM..'nuff said.

I stand for the flag and kneel at the cross
Boog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2007, 03:27 PM   #18
jim zag
ENGINE BUILDER
 
jim zag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Shortsville n.y.
Posts: 344
Re: 383 stroker,perfect for 67-72's?

I build engines for a living. I have built a number of stroker engines for my customers and was always impressed with the amount of torque they make. I decided to take the tired 307 out of my 68 LWB dailey driver and build a CHEAP stroker! I wanted to do a little REASEARCH and DEVELOPMENT for my customers sake. Here is what I did for fun. I found an early 2 bolt 350 block that no one wanted, bored it .030 over, bought the cheapest SCAT 3.75 stroke crank, resized some 400 rods with ARP bolts and bought the cheapest MAHLE dished 350 stock replacement pistons. I made sure the rod bolts did not hit the block,checked to see that the crankshaft counterweights did not hit the bottom of the pistons and decked the block to zero. Had my pal at the balance shop PRECISION BALANCE the whole assembly, and I put it together.
For heads I found a pair of 76cc smog heads and put 2.o2 intakes and 1.60 exhausts in and did some minor porting work. Camshaft is a crane 272H which is 216@.050 duration .454 lift. Intake is a Weiand stealth with heated crossover, holley vacuum 600 carb and an HEI with a CRANE vacuum advance kit.
This engine has 9.2 compression and pumps 165 psi on my compression tester.
I absolutely love the way it RUNSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! It starts right up, idles nice but still sounds like it has a cam in it. It just spins the tires. I can't keep my foot out of it!!!! I have my foot on the floor all the time. I feel like a fighter pilot looking for something to shoot at! IT DOES NOT COST MUCH TO BUILD ONE THIS WAY! JUST DO IT!
__________________
JIM ZAG
jim zag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2007, 04:20 PM   #19
locobandito
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 8
Re: 383 stroker,perfect for 67-72's?

Are TPI's common on the 383?

Great post. This is fueling my fire for a 383 build up.
locobandito is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2007, 10:21 PM   #20
texanidiot25
Eat My Rust
 
texanidiot25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Cypress, Texas
Posts: 3,362
Re: 383 stroker,perfect for 67-72's?

Quote:
Originally Posted by locobandito View Post
Are TPI's common on the 383?

Great post. This is fueling my fire for a 383 build up.
Dont believe the 383 ever came from the factory. As far as I know, its allways been an aftermarket thing.
texanidiot25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2007, 10:25 PM   #21
Deuce
Registered User
 
Deuce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Calgary, Alberta,Canada
Posts: 1,595
Re: 383 stroker,perfect for 67-72's?

Quote:
Originally Posted by wibilly View Post
duece, your thinking a 350 crank as well, my 406 has 5.7"rods as well
Yes you are right...I was tired. This also requires "spacer" main bearings.
__________________
I know what your thinking.......I have ESPN.

Sometimes it's easier to do things the hard way.

Fesler Built 1968 Chevy C10....Must resist the urge to mess with it!!
Deuce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2007, 10:29 PM   #22
Deuce
Registered User
 
Deuce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Calgary, Alberta,Canada
Posts: 1,595
Re: 383 stroker,perfect for 67-72's?

Quote:
Originally Posted by locobandito View Post
Are TPI's common on the 383?

Great post. This is fueling my fire for a 383 build up.
Around my house they are!!!



__________________
I know what your thinking.......I have ESPN.

Sometimes it's easier to do things the hard way.

Fesler Built 1968 Chevy C10....Must resist the urge to mess with it!!
Deuce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2007, 03:35 PM   #23
airdale94
Registered User
 
airdale94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Topeka,KS
Posts: 778
Re: 383 stroker,perfect for 67-72's?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 67_C-30 View Post
406's do not cool as good as 383's, especially in the application that I'm using it in. That's why GM never put a 400 in a medium or heavy duty application. They do make good street engines, but they are getting harder to find.
They put 400's in school buses. That's pretty heavy duty. Course they had superchargers on them.
airdale94 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2007, 03:39 PM   #24
airdale94
Registered User
 
airdale94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Topeka,KS
Posts: 778
Re: 383 stroker,perfect for 67-72's?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jim zag View Post
I build engines for a living. I have built a number of stroker engines for my customers and was always impressed with the amount of torque they make. I decided to take the tired 307 out of my 68 LWB dailey driver and build a CHEAP stroker! I wanted to do a little REASEARCH and DEVELOPMENT for my customers sake. Here is what I did for fun. I found an early 2 bolt 350 block that no one wanted, bored it .030 over, bought the cheapest SCAT 3.75 stroke crank, resized some 400 rods with ARP bolts and bought the cheapest MAHLE dished 350 stock replacement pistons. I made sure the rod bolts did not hit the block,checked to see that the crankshaft counterweights did not hit the bottom of the pistons and decked the block to zero. Had my pal at the balance shop PRECISION BALANCE the whole assembly, and I put it together.
For heads I found a pair of 76cc smog heads and put 2.o2 intakes and 1.60 exhausts in and did some minor porting work. Camshaft is a crane 272H which is 216@.050 duration .454 lift. Intake is a Weiand stealth with heated crossover, holley vacuum 600 carb and an HEI with a CRANE vacuum advance kit.
This engine has 9.2 compression and pumps 165 psi on my compression tester.
I absolutely love the way it RUNSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! It starts right up, idles nice but still sounds like it has a cam in it. It just spins the tires. I can't keep my foot out of it!!!! I have my foot on the floor all the time. I feel like a fighter pilot looking for something to shoot at! IT DOES NOT COST MUCH TO BUILD ONE THIS WAY! JUST DO IT!
A 307 is a 283 stroker (283 W/ a 327 crank). I guess you got a super stroker!
airdale94 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2007, 04:11 PM   #25
forsale
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Shingle springs, CA
Posts: 51
Re: 383 stroker,perfect for 67-72's?

Can 92 TBI unit be ran on the stroker? Or does the computer need to be changed?
forsale is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com