11-20-2007, 07:45 AM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: North Phoenix/Glendale, AZ
Posts: 53
|
Hot Rods To Hell
What does everyone think of the kit for the '67-72 trucks? I'm wanting my truck to hook hard (408" GenIII w/ SX88 turbo [Forcedinductions.com custom Borg Warner turbo]), but I also want a lower stance than a traditional 4/6 drop. I've thought about doing a parallel 4-bar or triangulated 4-link suspension with bags, but I have been unsure about reliability (I don't want to get stuck in the middle of nowhere without air or tools to fix a leak!). I was almost thinking about doing a 3" Belltech spindle in the front, 2" ECE drop spring, and the ECE 6" rear drop springs in the rear (w/ a 1" block as well), but I was told that the ride quality would suffer.
__________________
'71 Chevrolet C10 shortbed - 414" LQ9/4L80e/S91 turbo --- PROJECT! '99 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 A4 Yank 4200 stall/AZPS 03 cam (242/248 .621"/.615" @ .050" lift)/UMI 4130 suspension/True Duals/Moser 9" 3.73/AR Torq Thrust M's Black |
11-20-2007, 06:01 PM | #2 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: AL
Posts: 2,519
|
Re: Hot Rods To Hell
Quote:
|
|
11-21-2007, 02:32 PM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Valley Center KS
Posts: 3,525
|
Re: Hot Rods To Hell
There are several people hooking good with the stock trailing arm setup.
I'd get a longer adjustable panhard bar though (from ECE for example). I'm running airbags! |
11-21-2007, 04:27 PM | #4 |
A guy with a truck
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Germany, for now
Posts: 5,921
|
Re: Hot Rods To Hell
Their kit looks like an overdone panhard/shock relocation kit to me. You can do the same thing for much cheaper through other vendors.
Ride quality with the ECE drop components is likely better than stock due to the age of the stock components. If you want it to hook- set your pinion angle correctly and use a helper bag inside the passenger spring.
__________________
-Chris Instagram _elgringoloco_ '70 Short-Wide How to: Ruin a perfectly good C10 ‘70 Blazer ConversionHow To: Ruin a Perfectly Good 4wd '72 Highlander How To: Ruin a Perfectly Good K/5 (SOLD) '72 Blazer 2WD How to: Ruin a perfectly good Blazer (SOLD) '05 Yukon Daily Driven (not so stock) Yukon (SOLD) ‘07 Yukon Denali (daily) Members met list: SCOTI, darkhorse970, 67cheby, 67cheby'sGirl, klmore, porterbuilt, n2billet, Fastrucken, classicchev, Col Clank, GSFMECH, HuggerCST, Spray-Bomb, BACKYARD88, 5150, fine69, fatbass, smbrouss70, 65StreetCruiser, GAc10boy |
11-21-2007, 05:00 PM | #5 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,028
|
Re: Hot Rods To Hell
Quote:
A 6X ~ 72 truck already has all the 'basics' the HTH kit offers. The biggest difference is the adjustable panhard rod. Like Gringo mentioned, you can easily tinker w/the geometry of the stock set-up for similar results @ a much lower cost. A longer bar works best; either an aftermarket bar from a vendor or modify your original based on your fabrication skills/time.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol. |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|