The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-27-2007, 06:47 PM   #1
RicksTrucks
Senior Member
 
RicksTrucks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Claremore, OK 74017
Posts: 2,640
Question about 700R tranny

1. Is it a direct replacement for a TH350? Same length so no need to change the drive shaft?

2. What would be a good price for one from a running 80's van? Would $195 be okay?

3. What would be a good ratio rear end for it behind a 350 motor? I have heard a 3.73 would work best.
__________________
68 Short Stepside C-10
69 SWB C-10
70 Flatbed C-20
70 LWB C-20 BB402
70 LWB C-10 CST
70 LWB C-10 CST
71 Short Stepside Cheyenne C-10
72 LWB C-10
72 Blazer 4x4 4spd
95 Jeep Cherokee 4x4
RicksTrucks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2007, 07:38 PM   #2
trukindud
Registered User
 
trukindud's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: hooper ut
Posts: 77
Re: Question about 700R tranny

ive heard from my dad thats putting one in a 69 camero that there about 4 ich longer he said it would be good to rebild it well it is out cause you dont know how long the life it has left running dont mean much those gears would be awsome hope that is some help
__________________
64 buick skylark 65 buick skylark 67 chevy 2wd Lb 68 2w Lb 05 chevy colbalt
trukindud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2007, 07:39 PM   #3
49m
Registered User
 
49m's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Turners Station,Ky
Posts: 842
Re: Question about 700R tranny

The 350 trans is not overdrive. the 700r is. The drive shaft would have to be remade. The 373 gear ratio is good but it will not get you good gas milage.
__________________
My Rides

1969 Mustang gt coupe
1971 Chevy Cheyenne
1986 Iroc camaro
1986 K10 Short Bed
1987 Iroc Camaro
1990 rs Camaro
1992 350 ss truck
1998 Honda Civic
2005 Ram 2500 Cummins

My Build Thread
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=279831
49m is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2007, 07:42 PM   #4
cdowns
Senior Member
 
cdowns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: daytonabeach
Posts: 22,956
Re: Question about 700R tranny

if you have the original th350 with 6" tailshaft you need to shorten driveshaft// i only like doing a job once so i suggest getting it gone over and upgraded prior to installing
__________________
71c-10 350/2004r/4:11 lowered3/4 longbed/dead by hurricane

MEANING OF DEATH::::: SOMEBODY ELSE GETS YOUR STUFF

DONT BELIEVE EVERYTHING YOU THINK

TAKE MY ADVISE;I DON'T USE IT ANYWAY
cdowns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2007, 08:00 PM   #5
Gray Ghost
Senior Member
 
Gray Ghost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Terrell, TX
Posts: 1,967
Re: Question about 700R tranny

3.23's seem to be the best all around ratio for mileage and fun with the 700's deep first gear. Got a friend who has that combo in his El Camino and loves it. He gets 22 mpg when his foot is out of the firewall.
__________________
Kelly
'05 GMC Sierra SLE Z71
Bone stock except for new bed rail caps.

Last edited by Gray Ghost; 11-27-2007 at 08:00 PM.
Gray Ghost is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2007, 09:27 PM   #6
68C15
blood type; Retumbo
 
68C15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: next to my reloading bench
Posts: 10,269
Re: Question about 700R tranny

I just did the same swap in $700C10's truck 2 weeks ago. it came from an 89 astro and went in place of the TH350 9" tail shaft. we used the same drive shaft. I had to move the X-member back a little and drill new holes in the frame. i used the mount from the TH350 so I didnt have to drill new holes for the mount. (700R4s use a single stud while the 350s use a 2 studs mount) we gently bent the cooler lines to the slightly different place to mate with the 700. all in all it was a simple swap.

here is a list of the different trannies and their respective dimensions.
http://www.tciauto.com/Products/TechInfo/trans_dims.asp

I am getting ready to do the same for my truck. I think his has 3.08 gears. it moves quite nicely around town. I havent had a chance to take it on the highway yet. i will talk to him and see what he says about that.
68C15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2007, 09:58 PM   #7
STP67-72
Senior Member
 
STP67-72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: PORT NECHES, TEXAS / USA
Posts: 1,664
Re: Question about 700R tranny

I have done several 350 to 700's. The driveshaft will need to be shortened. You can move cross member and drill new holes in frame.The yoke will work but the 700 yoke is alittle longer. All of your shift linkage will also work. I have always run 373 gear.I have heard 308 does not work very good.I would say 342 or more.
Hope this helps.
__________________
55 Chevy original swb (big back window)
61 Chevy bubble top (427-5 speed)
67 Chevy stepside (Krusty)
68 Chevy swb fleet (Lola)
68 Chevy swb fleet
71 Chevy swb fleet ( future PB project)

97 crew cab power stroke
07 SS Trail blazer
STP67-72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2007, 10:03 PM   #8
N2TRUX
Happy to be here
 
N2TRUX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 39,023
Re: Question about 700R tranny

Good info Steve. You need to tell us more about what motor you are running, what tire size, and what is important to your personal needs. All of this will be important info to determine what gear ratio is good with a 700r4.
__________________
Follow me on Facebook and Instagram @N2trux.com

Articles-

"Jake" the 84 to 74 crewcab

"Elwood" the77_Remix

85 GMC Sierra "Scarlett"

"Refining Sierra"
N2TRUX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2007, 09:19 AM   #9
chris71
Registered User
 
chris71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sykesville MD
Posts: 357
Re: Question about 700R tranny

some years for the 700's are better than others, 82 was the first year, the first couple years are weaker, i think 86 and up are the stronger ones, dont get a 700 from a 6 cylinder car since the 6's have less clutches in them than v8's, the flexplate dustcover is the same between 700 and th350, you will need a 700 tv cable and dipstick tube, cant use the th350's. i had 3.73's in my truck when i had a 700 in her, i thought the combo was great, great off the line and good on the highway at 70 mph. you need to make sure your tv cable is adjusted properly, get this wrong tranny will blow in a matter of months, here are some links on the 700

http://www.purplesagetradingpost.com...o/700R4p1.html

http://www.transmissioncenter.net/700R4.htm

http://www.bowtieoverdrives.com/inde...FTgrOAodFU88Lw
__________________
'55 3100 2nd series short-bed stepside
'70 Corvette coupe stingray
'71 Chevelle 2-dr coupe SS clone
'71 C10 long-bed fleetside
'83 long-haired brunette wife
chris71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2008, 10:22 AM   #10
RicksTrucks
Senior Member
 
RicksTrucks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Claremore, OK 74017
Posts: 2,640
Re: Question about 700R tranny

Looks like it is from an 84 with a 350 motor. Would it be worth $175?
__________________
68 Short Stepside C-10
69 SWB C-10
70 Flatbed C-20
70 LWB C-20 BB402
70 LWB C-10 CST
70 LWB C-10 CST
71 Short Stepside Cheyenne C-10
72 LWB C-10
72 Blazer 4x4 4spd
95 Jeep Cherokee 4x4
RicksTrucks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2008, 10:39 AM   #11
Huck
Senior Member
 
Huck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Shelbyville, KY
Posts: 3,269
Re: Question about 700R tranny

Rick, I would pass on that one. The better ones came in 88 &up. You will need to swap out the tailshaft to the older style for the manual speedo cable hookup. 308 gears on a 700r4 are a bit tall for most---with 373 or 354/342 being a bit more desireable.
Huck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2008, 10:59 AM   #12
RicksTrucks
Senior Member
 
RicksTrucks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Claremore, OK 74017
Posts: 2,640
Re: Question about 700R tranny

Quote:
Originally Posted by Huck View Post
Rick, I would pass on that one. The better ones came in 88 &up. You will need to swap out the tailshaft to the older style for the manual speedo cable hookup. 308 gears on a 700r4 are a bit tall for most---with 373 or 354/342 being a bit more desireable.
Thanks
__________________
68 Short Stepside C-10
69 SWB C-10
70 Flatbed C-20
70 LWB C-20 BB402
70 LWB C-10 CST
70 LWB C-10 CST
71 Short Stepside Cheyenne C-10
72 LWB C-10
72 Blazer 4x4 4spd
95 Jeep Cherokee 4x4
RicksTrucks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2008, 11:04 AM   #13
70GMCer
Senior Member
 
70GMCer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Joppa, Maryland
Posts: 4,408
Re: Question about 700R tranny

Quote:
Originally Posted by RicksTrucks View Post
Looks like it is from an 84 with a 350 motor. Would it be worth $175?
Some will disagree, but, if you know it's working right, use it. Just replace the 1/2 shift servo to a Corvette one and also change out the boost valve. These parts are easy to install. You will also need the lockup wiring for the converter. Then, you'll have a nice shifting tranny. Also, no need for a shift kit in these.

This is what I bought along with a new valve body plate. Again, this is assuming that you don't have a big HP motor in front of it.

http://www.bulkpart.com/Merchant2/me...roduct_Count=4
__________________
1997 GMC Sierra Ext

1965 Mustang

Last edited by 70GMCer; 01-01-2008 at 11:07 AM.
70GMCer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2008, 02:48 PM   #14
hvychve
To The Levy
 
hvychve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: california
Posts: 391
Re: Question about 700R tranny

Well, for some reason, I have heard that the shaft needs to be shortened and some say it dont, however, I Installed a 700r4 into my truck and it used to have the 350 ENGINE, it bolted right up, I even used the same linkage, I also used the shaft, I shorted my slip yoke travel a bit but wasnt enough for me to worry, the front part of the shaft is pretty much stationary, it slips at the rear, near the center support, I than installed a stock 402 big block and used the big block mounts and perches, this ended up shoving my engine and trans back even further, now there was room for concern, I was butted up against the tail shaft seal, I than took off my center support bracket and shimmed it with about 1/2 spacers, ( I am talking about the bracket that bolts to the crossmember that bolts to center support bearing, this shoved my front drive shaft a little more than 1" and more than enough clearance from my tail seal, I improvised slippage from the two shafts but nothing to worry about , the two shafts still have plenty of in and out movememnt, So I am not clear on which trucks need to have shafts shortened and which ones dont.
I ended up using a custom bow tie trans , its above stock and can take some seriuos poundage( so they say) I soon will be adding some horsepower components to the big block, I guess we will see, good luck .
hvychve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2008, 04:18 PM   #15
red71cheyenne
Back in the sticks
 
red71cheyenne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Fordland, MO
Posts: 3,188
Re: Question about 700R tranny

The TH350's had different tail shaft lengths. On one, you'd have to change the drive shaft, on another you wouldn't. When I first swapped mine in, no change to the drive shaft was needed. I eventually went to a one piece shaft though, and thats the only reason I changed. Did have to move the cross member though, as all stated.

One big point I would make, is have the TV cable set by someone that knows how to do it. It'll make a difference in the life of the tranny. Hindsight it 20/20 on that one. Good luck!
__________________
1971 Cheyenne C-10 w/700R4 and Tuned Port Injection
1969 K5 Blazer w/Tuned Port
2010 2SS/RS Flaming Orange Camaro
2011 K1500 Suburban
2014 K1500 Pickup
2008 Nissan Altima? The wifes' hoopty
red71cheyenne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2008, 04:53 PM   #16
Pont406
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: West Hills, California
Posts: 679
Re: Question about 700R tranny

After you guys swapped to 700r4 do you still tow with it or majority of these swaps are for cruising only? I am starting to consider 700r4 also but I need to make sure that I still can tow with it, 5000 lbs max. Thanks.
Pont406 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2008, 07:42 PM   #17
red71cheyenne
Back in the sticks
 
red71cheyenne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Fordland, MO
Posts: 3,188
Re: Question about 700R tranny

I don't tow with mine, but I don't see why a beefed up '89 or newer one wouldn't handle it. If you went with a 4L60 or 4L80, you'd be even that much stronger. Just have to figure out the electronics on that.

Last time I had mine rebuilt(2nd time), the guy that did all the work, upgraded it to '92 and up standards. It has lasted longer than the others. The first one was an 87 that had to be rebuilt after only about 2000 miles. Once again, TV cable is really important.
__________________
1971 Cheyenne C-10 w/700R4 and Tuned Port Injection
1969 K5 Blazer w/Tuned Port
2010 2SS/RS Flaming Orange Camaro
2011 K1500 Suburban
2014 K1500 Pickup
2008 Nissan Altima? The wifes' hoopty
red71cheyenne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2008, 08:19 PM   #18
sickred72
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: oregon
Posts: 204
Re: Question about 700R tranny

yes you need to have the drive shaft cut 2" exactly. the 700r4 you need to look for is 1987 up ( thats the aux.valve body ) factory updated. 373 gears are the best, your gas milage would be great! 700r4's have a super low 1st gear..........i know all this because im in the tranny business...i own a torque converter shop in portland oregon. you can keep the lockup function by buying a part made by painless performance or tci. or you can buy a dummy lockup converter ( which would be the easy way ) and it would make the tranny the same as a th350 but with an extra gear. =) (you have to tell who ever builds your tranny to make it non lockup) if you want to use the lockup it works off a vacuum line.......dont let anyone talk you into using a toggle switch to go into lockup! YOU WILL FORGET TO FLIP THE SWITCH AND BURN IT UP COASTING DOWN HILL!!!!!!=(

Last edited by sickred72; 01-02-2008 at 05:25 AM.
sickred72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2008, 04:04 AM   #19
mnunn454
Registered User
 
mnunn454's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 602
Re: Question about 700R tranny

One thing not mentioned yet is an external tranny fluid cooler. Highly suggested because the later model trannys don't tolerate higher temps as well as the TH400/350/PG trannys do. Particularly relevant if you're going to tow anything.
__________________
69 C-10 SWB Fleetside 454/TH400 (For Sale)
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/c...ct=1299&cat=12
70 El Camino 454 TH700
29 Model A 4-DR Sedan Deluxe
mnunn454 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2008, 05:28 AM   #20
stope4
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston
Posts: 434
Re: Question about 700R tranny

If any highway driving, 3.73 gears or greater. Nothing less. With 3.08 gears my rpms were down in the 1400s when the vehicle shifted into overdrive. In other words, the power was terrible. Shorter drive shaft by about 3". You can use the existing linkage but it is a little off. My recomendation is you buy the linkage conversion kit. This will allow the linkage to line up. Do not expect to get 22 mpg. I'd say more like 16 is about right.

FWIW, this is my opinion only:
I did this conversion on my first truck. I wouldn't consider it on my existing truck. Don't get me wrong, I didn't have any problems with the transmission but there was a lot of tinkering to get it right. I had to deal with linkage, tv cable, driveshaft, yoke, rearend gears, lockup converter and the concern about towing for a few extra mpg. MPG is what it is. If you really need better gas mileage, I would think a used Honda would get you better bang for the buck.
stope4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2008, 07:26 AM   #21
piecesparts
Parts and more parts
 
piecesparts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lebo, Kansas (middle of nowhere
Posts: 6,821
Re: Question about 700R tranny

On myt ruck and my son's truck, the exchange was not that hard. The trannys were the same length (truck 350s have a longer output shaft tube, than most car trannys) The differences included the change in a my rear mounting points on the cross member, the front yoke (can be purchased), the shifter indications (I changed over to floor shifters) and the kick down cable. The 700 R4 is a little different than a 350 in it's principal---it needs to be adjusted just right.

The price is USUALLY commensurate with the quality of what you are purchasing. For instance; $195.00 for a GOOD 700 R4 is a rarity at best. My guess would be BEWARE! Unless you want to rebuild it before installing it. As for the gear ratio: I run 3.73 gears in my truck and my Son's and that gear ratio works great for all around driving. I personally would not go higer than a 3.42 gear, because you will loose what you are working for in the end with anything higher than that. Personal experience---My son's truck had a 3.08 geared rear end in ti , when we put in the OD tranny and we lost gas mileage, due to the truck working harder to make up speed and go over hills. My truck had a 3.42 geared rear end and it had to work more than I wanted it to to keep the cruise working on hills. The 3.73 gears allows my 383 stroker top work easily on the highway and to burn tires on the street. When we changed the son's truck to 3.73 gears the change in gas mileage wasa PLUS, going from 11 MPG to 14.5 MPG.


Our trannys do NOT have the lockup converters on them. We chose to eliminate that part and we still get the OD, just not that final lockup thing. I even have a 2400 stall converter on mine, due to the cam that I have in my engine. However I would do the change out again and even connect the lockup electrical switch. It was a great improvement to my truck. My DD is a 91 Silverado SWB with a 5.7 litre and 700 R4, and 3.42 gears. It gets about 20 MPG on the highway (it is a TBI truck) and it runs great. The fuel injection makes a remarkable difference in the driving on the highway.
piecesparts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2008, 08:56 AM   #22
BigSky71
LAIDOUT
 
BigSky71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: NW Montana
Posts: 928
Re: Question about 700R tranny

Quote:
Originally Posted by piecesparts View Post
On myt ruck and my son's truck, the exchange was not that hard. ...

Our trannys do NOT have the lockup converters on them. We chose to eliminate that part and we still get the OD, just not that final lockup thing.
In the research I have done I have seen this option advertised, a change to non-lockup that as I understand eliminates the whole TV cable setup, which obviously would make the installation easier. PParts, do you run the TV cable on your non-lockup 700s? In the Transgo ad I read that the non-lockup has a "negligable" effect on fuel mileage, so non-lockup sounds like a win/win to me unless it caused an overheat issue...
__________________
67 2wd Shorty
Build Pictures
BigSky71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2008, 09:32 AM   #23
zerwar
Sgt. Z
 
zerwar's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 102
Re: Question about 700R tranny

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigSky71 View Post
In the research I have done I have seen this option advertised, a change to non-lockup that as I understand eliminates the whole TV cable setup, which obviously would make the installation easier. ..

You have to run the TV cable because thats what controls your shifts.......no tv cable = Toasted 700R tranny

Yes it is really needed. This is the most misunderstood part of installing a
TH-700R4 and getting it correct is critical to the very survival of these transmissions. This TV cable system controls the internal hydraulic pumps production of hydraulic pressure and volume, if that isn't enough, it also has a major influence on shift timing, quality and "feel".


check out this link http://www.btobeta.com/700R4/
__________________
1967 Chevy SWB
1966 Malibu SS Convertible 355/420hp
700r4 and 373's with eaton posi


Quote:
To deny our own impulses, is to deny the very thing that makes us human~The Matrix
zerwar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2008, 10:33 AM   #24
piecesparts
Parts and more parts
 
piecesparts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lebo, Kansas (middle of nowhere
Posts: 6,821
Re: Question about 700R tranny

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigSky71 View Post
In the research I have done I have seen this option advertised, a change to non-lockup that as I understand eliminates the whole TV cable setup, which obviously would make the installation easier. PParts, do you run the TV cable on your non-lockup 700s? In the Transgo ad I read that the non-lockup has a "negligable" effect on fuel mileage, so non-lockup sounds like a win/win to me unless it caused an overheat issue...
In the late Nineties, I originally purchased the trannies for my truck (84 GMC) and my son's truck (86 Silverado) from a company called "Premier Performance", which is now the "JET Performance" company ( http://www.jetchip.com/ ). They sold their TH-700 trannies with the lockup feature removed BUT that was all--they still have the TV cable for the valve body to work. The trannies were sold with stall converters for a better use of the engine's power. I moved on from their intial 2200 stall to a 2400 stall and it works quite well. I have taken those trannies and rebuilt them to a heavier duty tranny and updated the planetaries in them to match what is on the market today. I have used the "Transgo" kits, and they are a good quality product. I get decent mileage for a 400+ HP motor and 3.73 gears and it does run well. Since the original purchase the trannies have gone through quite a change in my trucks and are stronger than before. The valve bodies still have the Transgo kits in them.

My Daily Driver is still a full fledged 700R4 tranny with the lockup converter and all of the original design parts. However, it has been also built up with the heavier duty clutch packs, larger planetary, Corvette governor, and sun gears, as well as a stronger valve body. It will kick your butt when shifting.
piecesparts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2008, 11:25 AM   #25
streetstar
Registered User
 
streetstar's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Moore, Oklahoma
Posts: 2,396
Re: Question about 700R tranny

$175, is a decent price for a rebuildable core i think -- but i wouldnt expect it to be reliable unless you had it gone through first.

'84 model shouldn't be a big deal as long as the trans shop rebuilding it understands you are putting it into something intended to go sorta fast, and not an old Fleetwood in a Donker project or something
__________________
Are you retired too?

Nonsense! I'm in my prime
streetstar is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com