The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Suspension

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-07-2008, 01:56 PM   #1
Painter D
Registered User
 
Painter D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: DFW (Forney)
Posts: 1,529
bagging my 69 (questions)

alright dudes i gonna bag my truck in a couple of months so im looking for which mounts are the best and simplest to run up front. i used to have a bagged , bodydropped truck many years ago so im not new to this stuff, just new to doing these trucks. all im interested in doing is getting the front to lay all the way down to the bottom of the control arms, and getting the back to lay as far down in the c notch as it will. im not looking for anything real serious just a simple setup. dont wanna fool with the steering , dont wanna fool with the crossmember. also as i stated above its been many years since ive had this stuff, what size bags are the majority of you guys running ( front,rear). when i used to have my s-10 it had 2600lbs. bags up front and 2800lbs bags out back, and that was on a much lighter truck , so does anybody run 2800lbs. bags up front in these trucks, or is something new and improved out now? oh yeah when i say it was many years ago , all we had was quarter inch airline and slow paddle valves, and cantilever setups were few and far between. any help would be great.
Painter D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2008, 02:03 PM   #2
Bagged Nissan
the fab shack
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: hell
Posts: 66
Re: bagging my 69 (questions)

2600's (224c in firestone, re7 in a slam or contitech 2600's) is what is most common to use in the front of these. Its not too small like a 2500 is in an s10. As you know we do them in dimes for better ride, that bag is just like running it on a dime, ride height might be a tad higher in the psi range due to weight, but its def not a waste up front. You can run a 2800 bag (re8 Slam bag) in the front, but its very soft and you'll need a good shock to help counter the softness. I would personally run 7's all around... you wont notice enough difference going to 8's.

we've improved a lot since the 1/4" and MIC manual valvea days. lol
Bagged Nissan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2008, 02:12 PM   #3
Painter D
Registered User
 
Painter D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: DFW (Forney)
Posts: 1,529
Re: bagging my 69 (questions)

ive noticed some people run what looks like a plate for an upper bag mount on the front, and some people run the cups. whats the pros and cons on those mounts. also ive enclosed a current pic of my truck if anyone notices anything that im not thinking of let me know.

Last edited by Painter D; 09-09-2008 at 07:09 PM.
Painter D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2008, 02:25 PM   #4
Bagged Nissan
the fab shack
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: hell
Posts: 66
Re: bagging my 69 (questions)

The upper plate with the lower cup will lay a 20 with a z on a smaller tire.. there are some ppl that run the upper plates, cut the hump and the adjacent side off, plate it as low as possible and mount the bag straight to that to get a bit lower.. using the upper cups you gotta cut your spring pocket too, but it also will let you go lower. I just cut the spring pocket off the frame completely and use a torsion bar plates.. this might be too much for what you want, but in doing this, i can mount the bracket anywhere and lay out without messing with the top plate setup or a top cup setup.

You can experiment what way you wanna go, I would probably go upper and lower cups for adjustability as far as lift and lower.. (you trim your upper cup to lay lower, but whatever you take off is approximently double at the wheel.. if you need to go down 1" to lay lower arms (assuming you dont wanna Z), then you cut half inch off the cup).

This is a picture of a c10 i did that used the plate upper and cup lower with an re7 bag.. as you can tell it wasnt getting at all and he put 22's on it.



this is laid out with a top plate, mcgaughy spindles and a re7.. this is also a 31" all terrain (he had no tires for the 22's yet)

Bagged Nissan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2008, 02:36 PM   #5
bdydrp97s10
Registered User
 
bdydrp97s10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Johnson City TN
Posts: 570
Re: bagging my 69 (questions)

can you lay the frame on the ground with the upper plates and lower cups, if you do a z.. and a 20 inch wheel with a 40 series tire???????
bdydrp97s10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2008, 02:41 PM   #6
Bagged Nissan
the fab shack
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: hell
Posts: 66
Re: bagging my 69 (questions)

Quote:
Originally Posted by bdydrp97s10 View Post
can you lay the frame on the ground with the upper plates and lower cups, if you do a z.. and a 20 inch wheel with a 40 series tire???????
not sure to be honest.. i only remember reading about what the gguys are going with awhile back.. There arent many c10's up here.. that is the first one I didnt do 'my way' with the torsion setup as its cleaner and a lot easier to work with. And that truck with the 265/25/22 tires would of been around 4" smaller then what is up there.. so I think a 235/35/20 and a 245/35/20 would lay.. but i'd measure before I bought the brackets.
Bagged Nissan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2008, 03:16 PM   #7
Painter D
Registered User
 
Painter D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: DFW (Forney)
Posts: 1,529
Re: bagging my 69 (questions)

no i dont wanna Z or remove the spring mounts all together, i just wanna get the lower control arms on the ground with as little modification as possible. (guess im just lazy)
Painter D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2008, 08:07 PM   #8
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,950
Re: bagging my 69 (questions)

Quote:
Originally Posted by 69chevyshort View Post
no i dont wanna Z or remove the spring mounts all together, i just wanna get the lower control arms on the ground with as little modification as possible. (guess im just lazy)
Do you still have my cell #? If so, give me a shout.

If you can, swing over to my part of town to see things first hand before I tear it down for the Dropmember swap.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.

Last edited by SCOTI; 01-07-2008 at 08:11 PM.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2008, 08:38 PM   #9
Painter D
Registered User
 
Painter D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: DFW (Forney)
Posts: 1,529
Re: bagging my 69 (questions)

hey Scoti ,yeah i still got your number maybe we can set something up next week.
Painter D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2008, 08:31 AM   #10
lowrod65
Registered User
 
lowrod65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: hillsboro tx
Posts: 65
Re: bagging my 69 (questions)

i have a 1965 chevy swb thats about to go under the knife also. im running everything from porterbuilt street rods for the front. they make a crossmember for 1947 thru 1987 that is bolt in to the factory holes. if you get the jan.08 street trucks magazine. they show an install for front crossmember kit. they are out of arizona.
lowrod65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2008, 08:34 AM   #11
lowrod65
Registered User
 
lowrod65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: hillsboro tx
Posts: 65
Re: bagging my 69 (questions)

you dont have to z the frame, and it will lay. they have alot of options for the 1947 thru 1987 front setups. chek their website out, they have alot more info than what i can give.
lowrod65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2008, 09:06 AM   #12
Bagged Nissan
the fab shack
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: hell
Posts: 66
Re: bagging my 69 (questions)

you dont have to Z if you run a porterbuilt crossmember, its a damn quality piece, but wasnt sure if he had 1200 in his budget for that piece alone.
Bagged Nissan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2008, 10:20 AM   #13
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,950
Re: bagging my 69 (questions)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bagged Nissan View Post
you dont have to Z if you run a porterbuilt crossmember, its a damn quality piece, but wasnt sure if he had 1200 in his budget for that piece alone.
Exactly. For some reason I think he want's to keep it simple......

Quote:
Originally Posted by 69chevyshort
.....all im interested in doing is getting the front to lay all the way down to the bottom of the control arms, and getting the back to lay as far down in the c notch as it will. im not looking for anything real serious just a simple setup. dont wanna fool with the steering , dont wanna fool with the crossmember.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2008, 01:41 PM   #14
Painter D
Registered User
 
Painter D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: DFW (Forney)
Posts: 1,529
Re: bagging my 69 (questions)

yeah , back in the day i would go for the DROPMEMBER , and all kinds of other good stuff to compliment the whole setup. but its a simpler time now not to mention the wife is about to quit working so now i have to budget for that. HOWEVER, is it possible to install the dropmember with the motor in the truck? and if i did go that route what would i do with my new quick ratio gear box
Painter D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2008, 02:04 PM   #15
lowrod65
Registered User
 
lowrod65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: hillsboro tx
Posts: 65
Re: bagging my 69 (questions)

yes you can install it without pulling the motor. in the street truck tech artical they install it without pulling the motor.
lowrod65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2008, 02:12 PM   #16
Painter D
Registered User
 
Painter D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: DFW (Forney)
Posts: 1,529
Re: bagging my 69 (questions)

well thats good news about the dropmember, oh yeah i was being sarcastic about my gear box. LOL
Painter D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2008, 03:04 AM   #17
lowrod65
Registered User
 
lowrod65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: hillsboro tx
Posts: 65
Re: bagging my 69 (questions)

oh hell man , it didnt even hit me like that. by the way your truck is gonna look insane on the the ground.
lowrod65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com