The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > All 4x4 Tech & Off Roading

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-24-2008, 08:08 PM   #1
vtblazer
Registered User
 
vtblazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Central Vermont
Posts: 8,538
Answer My Peeve

Why do people build trucks with big tires and 1/2 ton axles/running gear?

I'm relating to 37" and up sized tires on 6-lug half ton axles.

Besides the fact that breakage is imminent at some point, I see it as a major safety issue based on physical braking surface size and basic brake design.
Then it continues on with steering, shock and large unsuspended weight issues.
Seems crazy dangerous to me in so many ways.

Maybe I'm thinking to much into it but I just can't understand it.
vtblazer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2008, 09:23 PM   #2
-Greg72
Registered User
 
-Greg72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 308
Re: Answer My Peeve

Ignorance.
__________________

1972 K5 - 502BBC/4L80E/Magnum205/Mog-9s/5.26s/38" BFG KM2s


Find me on INSTAGRAM @MIGHTASWELLK5

'72 K5 - Greg's "Might As Well™" Build
-Greg72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2008, 09:24 PM   #3
mothertrucker424
Registered User
 
mothertrucker424's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: st pete
Posts: 404
Re: Answer My Peeve

well mine is 1/2 ton and i understand its limits i don't tail gate and ease to a stop andone day i'll opt for 1 ton axles and the shbang but now this is what i can afford
__________________
_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-

1972 K10 4"lift 33"tires (soon to be bigger and better)
2000 silverado 1500 2wd 2"coil spacers3" BL 285/75/16's
mothertrucker424 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2008, 09:28 PM   #4
vtblazer
Registered User
 
vtblazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Central Vermont
Posts: 8,538
Re: Answer My Peeve

Quote:
Originally Posted by mothertrucker424 View Post
well mine is 1/2 ton and i understand its limits i don't tail gate and ease to a stop andone day i'll opt for 1 ton axles and the shbang but now this is what i can afford
With 33's your not in the 'danger zone' but simply knowing and driving accordingly makes a big difference.
vtblazer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2008, 10:45 PM   #5
shelby987
Registered User
 
shelby987's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Just outside Durham, NC
Posts: 894
Re: Answer My Peeve

I would say it all comes down the $$$.....I am looking at doing the upgrades, and unfortunately, suspension, wheels, tires, and axles all to put the truck up in the air on some nice tires and keep the gear at a safe level gets expensive quick......I am luck with the 3/4t....but I still don't want much larger than my soon to be 34" without king pins! (I am just happy I can keep the same wheels when it is all said and done).....I haven't found an easy way to do it in stages just yet (aside from buying parts in stages....and leaving them in the garage).
__________________
1969 SS 350 Camaro Sold 2008
1970 3/4T K20, stock height with 33's, 250 I6, 3 on the tree, and locked front and rear 4.10's
1980 Chevy Malibu 2 dr Sold 2007
1993 Olds. Cutlass Ciera Wagon Traded 2006
2003 Saturn L200 w/5pd. D/D
My list spans 5 decades with One common thread.....GM!
shelby987 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2008, 11:46 PM   #6
Burt4x4
Registered User
 
Burt4x4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Modesto, CA
Posts: 1,842
Re: Answer My Peeve

Pavement Pounders & Rookies
Bought Not Built
Silver Spoon City Slickers

That should help you understand why you see that done
__________________
1972 K5 MPFI454/Sm465/Np205/D60/14FFd/Re-Centerd H1s w/Swamper Iroks
Burt4x4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2008, 12:12 AM   #7
Yukon Jack
Post Whore
 
Yukon Jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Rose Hill, KS, USA
Posts: 12,683
Re: Answer My Peeve

This will be a laugh for you - as you may recall I did the reverse, I upgraded to 3/4 ton gear on my 70 K5 so I could run these bad boys



Sweet tread but IIRC they are only like 31". When I got the K5 its tires were shot and the cheap chrome rims were in bad shape also. I had the above tires with excellent tread - these tires and rims were left over from when I lifted my 69 K20 initially and put on the 35"s. The K5's axles needed brakes and it was drums all around so my smart brain said, get 3/4 ton axles to gain disk brakes up front and the mighty 14 bolt FF out back and then I can use these tires on their existing 8 lug rims. Made alot more sense money wise to me.

For the guys running 37" or larger tires on 1/2 gear, I think it comes down to a $$$ issue and a bit of ego - it's cool to have big tires and you can have big tires for $1,300 to $1,500 on your existing 6 lug rims or do it right for an extra $500 for 8 lug rims and $1,000 to $1,500 for 1 ton axles. It's easy to forget the safety aspect when you going for the look and don't have the extra $2,000 or so to move up to 8 lug rims and 1 ton axles.

I also think alot of people forget the very thing that worries you most - those big tires weigh a lot and compromise the 1/2 ton gear's ability to safely stop due to that extra weight. I think alot of people focus on the worry of breaking the axle with the big tires and think in their mind, I'll just drive it easy, but I see the bigger concern that you do - the ability of the axle to control that much tire. In an emergency situation, can the 1/2 ton gear stop a 37" tire as well as a 31" tire, of course not.

Whenever I see a post about someone considering going with big tires with 1/2 axles, I always try to mention the braking/safety issue - maybe it falls on deaf ears, but if we all point it out to them, maybe we can shift the focus from "you're axles won't hold up to those tires" to "your axles can't safely stop those tires and you might end up killing someone."
__________________
1970 Blazer with a 400 sbc and 4" lift
1980 Pontiac Trans Am, 455 Oldsmobile
2012 Kawasaki Concours 14
Yukon Jack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2008, 01:09 AM   #8
Zoomad75
K5Camper
 
Zoomad75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Pueblo, CO
Posts: 1,513
Re: Answer My Peeve

I agree on some points made here. Some guys put the cart in front of the horse and get the big tires first and then save up for the upgraded running gear later. Others just do it to have big tires. (poser)

I have to say my K5 is maxed out on tire size at 35" with my current 1/2 ton axles. Even when I do get a 14bolt I'm most likely just going to add the 8 lug parts to my existing D44. Why not a D60? Because money don't grow on trees around here. With an open D44 and 35's and light right foot the front axle will live a long life under my K5. The 8lug parts will give a larger rotor for more swept area, greater heat dissapation. The big drums out back on a 14 bolt are almost twice the size of the 12 bolt stuff.

I my case I fit into the first category. I needed tires and rather than buying a larger set later I bought the size I wanted. I know the limits of the stock 1/2 ton axles and try not to beat on them. It means I take the hook sooner, but my truck ends up driving home after we get off the trail.

Now a old Nieghbor of mine back in the burbs of Detroit built a total poser mobile. 1988 NBS, 1/2 ton with 6" of lift and 38" tires on a stock 10b rear and IFS up front. I teased him all the time he's going to break a 10bolt shaft on the way to the gas station. He really didn't get it for a long time. But since he had so much money wrapped up in nice aluminum rims he didn't want to have to change to 8 lug parts. He at least found a 6 lug 14 bolt semi floater axle for the rear and was going to stuff a 3/4 ton diff up front while keeping the 6 lug outers. Still a poser to me but he does wheel it at the silver lake dunes from time to time.

Unfortunately you cant convince them all. It usually takes a broken axle for somebody to wake up and see the light.
__________________
Rob Z.
1975 K5 350/465/205/D44/12b 4" lift on 35's- RIP
1991 K5 8.1L/NV4500/241/D44/14b FWC Camper
Zoomad75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2008, 02:13 AM   #9
shilo
Registered User
 
shilo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Grand Junction , CO
Posts: 602
Re: Answer My Peeve

I didnt think there was a difference between 1/2 and 3/4 brakes on a dana 44. How much of a difference is there?
__________________
71 swb 4x4, 37" Iroks, t400/205 496
77 CJ-7, Narrowed Dana 60 Lockrite, 14 Bolt Spool, 4.56 gears, 39.5" boggers. 360 t-18/d20
shilo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2008, 04:46 AM   #10
Yukon Jack
Post Whore
 
Yukon Jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Rose Hill, KS, USA
Posts: 12,683
Re: Answer My Peeve

Quote:
Originally Posted by shilo View Post
I didnt think there was a difference between 1/2 and 3/4 brakes on a dana 44. How much of a difference is there?
For me the benefit of the 3/4 ton Dana 44 for my K5 was I went from the 1/2 ton Dana 44 with drum brakes to the newer 3/4 ton Dana 44 with disks. I don't know if a disk braked 1/2 ton Dana 44 is different than a disk braked 3/4 ton Dana 44 - I'm guessing they are the same.

If you're stepping up from a 1/2 ton setup to accomodate tires in the 37" or larger size I wouldn't be recommending going to the 3/4 ton Dana 44, I'd be recommending the Dana 60 for strength as well as better braking.
__________________
1970 Blazer with a 400 sbc and 4" lift
1980 Pontiac Trans Am, 455 Oldsmobile
2012 Kawasaki Concours 14

Last edited by Yukon Jack; 01-25-2008 at 04:47 AM.
Yukon Jack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2008, 04:51 AM   #11
vtblazer
Registered User
 
vtblazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Central Vermont
Posts: 8,538
Re: Answer My Peeve

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yukon Jack View Post
For me the benefit of the 3/4 ton Dana 44 for my K5 was I went from the 1/2 ton Dana 44 with drum brakes to the newer 3/4 ton Dana 44 with disks. I don't know if a disk braked 1/2 ton Dana 44 is different than a disk braked 3/4 ton Dana 44 - I'm guessing they are the same.
Even so, the master cylinders are different, correct?
Maybe that's how they achieve the better braking power in the 3/4 ton set up.
vtblazer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2008, 05:58 AM   #12
Yukon Jack
Post Whore
 
Yukon Jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Rose Hill, KS, USA
Posts: 12,683
Re: Answer My Peeve

I don't know if the master cylinders are different between the 1/2 ton and 3/4 ton. I swapped the 3/4 ton donor truck's master cylinder in when I swapped in the 3/4 ton Dana 44 as my K5 had manual brakes and the donor truck had power brakes.
__________________
1970 Blazer with a 400 sbc and 4" lift
1980 Pontiac Trans Am, 455 Oldsmobile
2012 Kawasaki Concours 14
Yukon Jack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2008, 06:30 AM   #13
68,69 K20
They call me the Breeze...
 
68,69 K20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: New York
Posts: 2,251
Re: Answer My Peeve

I believe it may be ignorance on some peoples part, I know too many people who think that 4x4= unbreakable. Several years back one of my buds put 36' or 37's on his mid 80's half ton, no other drivetrain mods were made, and he couldn't understand why it wouldn't stop or steer...he finally got the point when the rearend grenaded and shot the pass side axle over about a 15 ft embankment and the truck was close to following....Some just dont get it!!!
__________________
Mike

69 K20

"Beer is proof God loves us and wants us to be happy"....Ben Franklin
68,69 K20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2008, 06:50 AM   #14
vtblazer
Registered User
 
vtblazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Central Vermont
Posts: 8,538
Re: Answer My Peeve

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yukon Jack View Post
I don't know if the master cylinders are different between the 1/2 ton and 3/4 ton. I swapped the 3/4 ton donor truck's master cylinder in when I swapped in the 3/4 ton Dana 44 as my K5 had manual brakes and the donor truck had power brakes.
Not positive with other years but yeah, our years have different masters/boosters.

That's one of the best mods you can do to make the sorry-a$$ half ton brakes work better, switch in a 3/4 or 1 ton set up and presto, better brakes.
vtblazer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2008, 07:03 AM   #15
Yukon Jack
Post Whore
 
Yukon Jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Rose Hill, KS, USA
Posts: 12,683
Re: Answer My Peeve

You're right about that! I went from manual brakes on my 69 K20 to hydroboost from a 1 ton and the difference was astonishing - and that is with drum brakes all around! I can't wait until I swap out the drum brake front axle for the Dana 60 shortly - I will probably knock my head agaisnt the windshield the first time I hit the brakes
__________________
1970 Blazer with a 400 sbc and 4" lift
1980 Pontiac Trans Am, 455 Oldsmobile
2012 Kawasaki Concours 14
Yukon Jack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2008, 09:20 AM   #16
jeffspower
Well, Whoop-dee-do!
 
jeffspower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Easton, Mo. pop.- me & scarcely a few others
Posts: 2,302
Re: Answer My Peeve

Im not sure what years/ GVW's had what- but some of the 3/4 ton front axles had calipers with bigger pistons than the 1/2 tons. I found this out when I went to put a '81 1/2 ton caliper on an '80 3/4 ton. The banjo bolt for the brake hose was bigger too.
__________________
'68 GMC shortbox 4x4 350/SM465/T221- bought it in '83 SOLD

'72 K20 500 Cad/TH400/NP205 SOLD

'92 Chevy 2500 6.5 mech TD 4L80E crusty daily driver

'72 Monte Carlo... sweet low mile toy

'11 Dodge Challenger IE 392 6spd... midlife car
jeffspower is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2008, 09:56 AM   #17
bad_turbo
turbo enthusiast
 
bad_turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: carmichael, ca.
Posts: 1,826
Re: Answer My Peeve

My "67 1/2 ton suburban got a new master cylinder (for a 1/2 ton) then 2 months later I swapped in 3/4 ton front and rear axles, along with the suspension, off of a '68 GMC truck so I could run 37 inch tires. No problem with the brakes at all.
Attached Images
 
__________________
"But daddy, I didn't hit them all with a stick"...what my 6 year old tells me when I pick him up from school early for fighting "
bad_turbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2008, 12:15 PM   #18
wibilly
Senior Member
 
wibilly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: northwestern wi
Posts: 2,111
Re: Answer My Peeve

Why do people build trucks with big tires and 1/2 ton axles/running gear?

in my opinion they arn't built trucks they are jacked up pos that are worthless for trucks or wheelers unsafe on or offroad
__________________
common sense isn't so common anymore
wibilly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2008, 01:59 PM   #19
ND_guy
Tool Addiction=Money Shortage
 
ND_guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Grand Forks, ND
Posts: 233
Re: Answer My Peeve

1/2ton D44 Rotor Diameter 11.875"
3/4ton D44 Rotor Diameter 12.480"
D60 Rotor Diameter 12.870"

I was going to upgrade my pickup after it ate two lockouts this year. Now, I don't have to since I nuetered my pickup, by pulling the 400 out.
__________________
1967 K20 400TBI SM465/NP205
posi front, Detroit locker 4.56 rear

Last edited by ND_guy; 01-25-2008 at 02:00 PM.
ND_guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2008, 09:24 PM   #20
eric67m
Registered User
 
eric67m's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Monroe, WA
Posts: 298
Re: Answer My Peeve

Thats it, I am going to do the complete opposite.

How about going with 2 1/2 ton Rockwells and then finding a way to adapt them down to the smallest wheel and tire possible. (Think 13" Dayton wire spokes with low profile white walls (90's lowered cars))
__________________
67 K10, lwb, fleetside, 327, 4spd, 205, cab and 3/4 frame swap, 14 bolt, big window, and a "rustoleum roll job"
eric67m is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2008, 01:16 AM   #21
ND_guy
Tool Addiction=Money Shortage
 
ND_guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Grand Forks, ND
Posts: 233
Re: Answer My Peeve

Eric I love it, but I dont think 100 spoke Daytons could support the weight of a Rockwell! On second thought, the center diff would be on the ground so they wouldn't have to support the axles. GO FOR IT!
__________________
1967 K20 400TBI SM465/NP205
posi front, Detroit locker 4.56 rear
ND_guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2008, 01:48 AM   #22
earl87gta
Senior Member
 
earl87gta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Kingsport TN
Posts: 4,641
Re: Answer My Peeve

I think the big problem is all the mags these guys read are always talking abought jeeps well if you put 37in tires on a jeep with a d44 then ya no trouble but on a full size truck that waighs 2 to 3 times as much its a hole new battle the mags seem not to talk about that. Im with what Yukon most of these guys are thinking how to keep from breaking an axle and not how will this afect my stopping power. All we can do is voice our opinons on line and hope that our advice will over ride wht they think the mags are telling them is ok.
__________________
Earl
68 2500 4x4 GMC Burb
earl87gta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2008, 04:29 AM   #23
vtblazer
Registered User
 
vtblazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Central Vermont
Posts: 8,538
Re: Answer My Peeve

Okay, so the concensus is all about the same.

So everytime I see another one, I'll just shake my head and think 'TARDS' quietly to myself.
vtblazer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2008, 07:26 AM   #24
shilo
Registered User
 
shilo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Grand Junction , CO
Posts: 602
Re: Answer My Peeve

i run narrowed 1 ton in my jeep with a stock wrangler master cylander and vaccum booster. My jeep came with manual brakes, but now i can lock up the 39.5 boggers anytime.
__________________
71 swb 4x4, 37" Iroks, t400/205 496
77 CJ-7, Narrowed Dana 60 Lockrite, 14 Bolt Spool, 4.56 gears, 39.5" boggers. 360 t-18/d20
shilo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2008, 12:37 AM   #25
Dean
Senior Member
 
Dean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 1,492
Re: Answer My Peeve

Reminds me of my first 4x4 in high school. 78 K10 shortbed with 38" gumbo mudders. Lack of funds was the issue....lol. I drove it around most of the time in low range too.

It was fun though helping the cheerleaders get up in my truck......lol
Attached Images
 
Dean is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com