Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
02-04-2008, 03:03 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: San Jose Ca.
Posts: 3,342
|
Thickness of balancer for 327
I was talking to a guy that specializes in selling balancers and he was telling me that truck 327 balancers were thicker than others as well as the same thickness as the 350s that were put into the 69s. Now the reason I ask this is because I did have a issue with pulley alignment before I installed my 8 balancer. So here is my question is this true? Say could a truck 307 and 327 have a different thickness of balancer? Also by thick I mean from front of balancer to the back.
I know another wacked question from skokie LOL
__________________
RIP to my son Dylan. 5/17/2002 - 8/18/2018 If you want to know more about rare forms of pediatric cancer or if you want to help fund pediatric cancer research, please check out the website for the non-profit I started. https://slothforpedcancer.org 68 build thread http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=223234 |
02-04-2008, 05:40 PM | #2 |
1972 Chevrolet SWB
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: FT Smith AR
Posts: 512
|
Re: Thickness of balancer for 327
Generally the length of the balancers are the same. The diameters and the widths of them change from engines and years but the mounting surface of the pulleys usually stays constant no matter what balancer you have. I hope that make sense,and didnt confuse you. Early 327 had very thin balancer rings of a small diameter but still had a snout location for the pulley to mount to,which would be the same as a later 327/350 except for the newer ones being thicker and larger diameter.
There were a few common balancers from the late 50's to 67 that were very thin and small diameter due to the small journal crankshafts. Once 68 started using large journal cranks,thicker and larger diameter balancers were used then. I believe that 68 and up used 6-7-8 inch balancers depending on applications. I guess with my rambling I am trying to say that the surface which the pulleys mount on the balancer should all be the same as long as the balancer is pulled all the way on to the cranks frt snout.
__________________
My New thread with pics (not my build thread yet.) http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...46#post2573646 1972 Chevrolet 1/2 ton short wide bed,68 frt clip Project. 1980 Camaro Inherited when father passed,68K Miles 2003 Ford Mach1 FUN as Hell!! 2002 Dodge Ram 5-8 slam Rolling BillBoard (Gone not forgot) 2004 Dodge Ram HEMI 10" lifted on 37's and 2wd. |
02-05-2008, 12:41 AM | #3 |
Fabricate till you "puke"
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Ill
Posts: 9,402
|
Re: Thickness of balancer for 327
Yup, what he said ^ even the old 283s with a steel hub(no damper ring), were the same depth from the face , to the back where they bottomed on the crank gear. you have missmatched pulleys, or the balancer is not pulled all the way on.....crazyL
__________________
69 longhorn,4" chop,3/5 drop, 1/2 ton suspension/disc brakes,1 1/2" body drop,steel tilt clip, 5.3/Edelbrock rpm intake/600 carb, Hooker streetrod shorties,2 1/2" exhaust/ H pipe/50's Flows , 6 spd Richmond trans,12 bolt/ 3.40 gears.... |
02-05-2008, 02:11 AM | #4 | |
Sierra Grande Club
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New Mexico USA
Posts: 2,433
|
Re: Thickness of balancer for 327
Quote:
But in short, I have proven that this is a common issue –and probably goes unnoticed most of the time. Summit even sells spacers to correct this. I wonder why? I made my own to fix my problem. I have a few spares (my proto type) that I can finish and give you. You pay the postage and they are yours. Probably 2.50 to send by mail. Here is a picture of what they look like. I think I did a write up on how I did all this. s/t
__________________
1971 GMC Sierra Grande, 1/2 ton short wide, original 4 bolt 010 020 block & heads. (matching #'s). 383 stroker, SMI q jet 750 cfm, Lunati Voodoo 60102 cam, Scorpion roller rockers, Spin Tech pro street mufflers with X pipe. |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|