Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-04-2008, 09:07 AM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Alberta
Posts: 117
|
Is the frame supposed to be like this???
I dont have a pictures so Ill try to describe it as best as possible.
About 7" behind the tranny crossmember on the drivers side the frame looks funky. By funky I mean not this shape --> ] Its like the bottom flat part of the rail just sags. Its not damaged, it looks like it was made that way which puzzles me. Excuse the crudeness of this drawing but my camera isnt working. Thanks for all the help, Wes
__________________
Wes 1980 GMC Sierra SCSB-2WD 1986 Chevrolet C10 SCSB-2WD |
03-04-2008, 09:23 AM | #2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,684
|
Re: Is the frame supposed to be like this???
yes
__________________
1986 C10 SWB 6.0/6l90e Miami...Flee it like a native |
03-04-2008, 09:23 AM | #3 |
senior member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: fort macleod alberta
Posts: 2,770
|
Re: Is the frame supposed to be like this???
i believe this was catalytic converts? i could be wrong tho
__________________
69 GMC bagged |
03-04-2008, 09:24 AM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Caldwell,Tx.
Posts: 3,648
|
Re: Is the frame supposed to be like this???
That is correct . I think GM got lazy or something around 1980 or so and the driver side frame rail looks like that . Looks weak to me also but I have seen Many trucks like that . Must be some sort of crumple zone built into the frame to aid in a crash . Frank
__________________
Born and proudly residing in a Red State ! |
03-04-2008, 09:25 AM | #5 | |
6.0 powered square
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Mesquite texas
Posts: 3,459
|
Re: Is the frame supposed to be like this???
Quote:
__________________
Aaron 1980 c-10 short bed lowered, cammed 6.0, 4l80e 3600 stall, smp tune, wilwoods, and flames best time so far best et 7.86 @87 on motor 7.57 90 on a 75 shot Build http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=283326 |
|
03-04-2008, 09:30 AM | #6 |
Gentleman Jim Driver
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Poulsbo, WA
Posts: 1,553
|
Re: Is the frame supposed to be like this???
It's not that GM was lazy. If they were lazy, they wouldn't build a die to bend a straight frame.
The bend is there to give clearance the for the catalytic converter. The original GM pellet type converters were huge and got really hot. The bend was to keep that section of frame away from the cat. My 75 Gentleman Jim has it all the way up to the 87 diesel I used to have (even though it didn't have a cat, the frame was the same as the rest...)
__________________
Joe '75 GMC Gentleman Jim '84 Chev C10 Short Wide - Super duper plain (manual steering, manual brakes, no dome light, no cig lighter) '85 Chev C10 Short Wide - Super plain Vortec 4.8 4L60E trans also: '81 K30, '83 C30 Crew Dually, '84 M1028 CUCV, '85 M1009 CUCV, another '85 C10 SWB, '89 R3500 Flatbed |
03-04-2008, 09:36 AM | #7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Alberta
Posts: 117
|
Re: Is the frame supposed to be like this???
Thanks for all the quick replies everyone.
So if I ever wanted to lay frame would I have to bend that? or leave it?
__________________
Wes 1980 GMC Sierra SCSB-2WD 1986 Chevrolet C10 SCSB-2WD Last edited by 1980GMC; 03-04-2008 at 09:49 AM. |
03-04-2008, 09:48 AM | #8 |
chevy only
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 6,619
|
Re: Is the frame supposed to be like this???
That was a good question, and good answer, when i got mine we thought it was hit or pulled out of ditch, we had to heat it and flatin it out when we lowered it
__________________
CHEVY ONLY... Nothin Else ! |
03-04-2008, 09:58 AM | #9 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Alberta
Posts: 117
|
Re: Is the frame supposed to be like this???
Haha I assumed the same about mine and was wondering if there was something I wasnt told about by the PO.
Thanks for all the help everyone.
__________________
Wes 1980 GMC Sierra SCSB-2WD 1986 Chevrolet C10 SCSB-2WD |
Bookmarks |
|
|