Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-15-2008, 07:33 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Monroe,Georgia
Posts: 313
|
Suzuki Sidekck tank in 69 GMC?
I know it sounds stupid but here me out. I have already run my exhaust and in my opinion a Blazer tank hangs to low under the truck from some of the pics I've seen. I went to a junkyard and looked under numerous cars and trucks for and alternative. I found a Suzuki Sidekick tank that will go under the rear of the bed and bolt in with no cutting(other than the fuel filler hole) at all. It also would bolt to the frame without straps. The bad thing for most would be its only 11 gallons. That dosen't bother me because I only drive it occassionally. Its about 2.5 inches thinner than a Blazer tank so you wouldn't see it as easily under the bumper. My only ? is would the signal from the sending unit be compatible with my gauge?
|
03-15-2008, 07:36 PM | #2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Bellingham, WA
Posts: 167
|
Re: Suzuki Sidekck tank in 69 GMC?
The fuel lines would be way to small for a v8, it would work for a grandma driven I6, I beleive the fuel line is 1/4". I could check the sidekick tank that I have at home.
__________________
70 GMC LWB Fleetside, 402BB, TH400 90K original only cost $50. |
03-15-2008, 08:52 PM | #3 |
Lemme show you something!!
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: St.Helens, OR.
Posts: 876
|
Re: Suzuki Sidekck tank in 69 GMC?
I too have been checking out alternatives to the Blazer tank (I also don't like how low it hangs) or the 400-500 dollar Aluminum / S.S. fabbed units. So I was under the a$$-end of my Cherokee, working on the trailer lights, and saw how neat the tank tucked up under there and noticed that distance between the sub-frame rails was pretty close to that of my '67. So this weekend I'll be doing some careful measuring and if it looks viable- scoring a tank out of a dead Cherokee....trust me- there's lots of those in the world!
__________________
'67 CST-10 LWB ("Crusty") SOLD '67 GMC SWB ("Murdock") 2000 K1500 Suburban ("Betty") '95 BMW 325i ("Joy") |
03-15-2008, 09:28 PM | #4 |
68 just like me
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: canton ga.
Posts: 142
|
Re: Suzuki Sidekck tank in 69 GMC?
if you use the sidekick in tank pump wouln't the presure be to high for a carb since it is probably fuel injected . that might be some thing to think about also. I think they are set up where can't draw trough them if they are not running . if you find the topic about using a blazer tank and do like in it and cut out the ring around the sending unit and bend the float it might work but be careful that it will clear the baffel in the suzuki tank.
__________________
68 just like me |
03-15-2008, 09:45 PM | #5 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Alexandria, LA 71301
Posts: 1,451
|
Re: Suzuki Sidekck tank in 69 GMC?
it is possible to use the sidekick tank (with the in-tank pump) with the carb, but you'll need a fuel regulator to reduce pressure at the carb. there are generic ones out there that'll do the job. i helped a guy set one up on an application similar to this a few years ago and the parts only ran about 50 bucks. good luck.
__________________
-02 avalanche (daily driver) -66 gto ragtop 389/400 (garage queen, hand-me-down from dad) -72 Tribute Trans Am (6.0LS/T56 6-speed) in progress -2003 YUKON (Wife's) -71 gmc swb fleet (current project, gonna shave everything, bags, stuff w/ 20's, gen III powertrain) -48 3100 SWB - 12/31/23 LONG TERM Project |
03-15-2008, 09:49 PM | #6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: antreville, south carolina
Posts: 873
|
Re: Suzuki Sidekck tank in 69 GMC?
The EFI in tank pump pressures for a carb would be to high..but just like an s10 tank from an EFI truck it can be corrected with a fuel pressure regulator..but the lines arent big enough and to me it seems like it be more trouble then its worth..just my two cents
__________________
"Dixie Destroyer" 71 C10 LWB Fleet Future Blown Prostreet Monster |
03-16-2008, 01:33 AM | #7 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Alexandria, LA 71301
Posts: 1,451
|
Re: Suzuki Sidekck tank in 69 GMC?
i agree that it may be more trouble than it's worth, but it can be done if the in-tank pump has adequate flow to support the engines demands.
__________________
-02 avalanche (daily driver) -66 gto ragtop 389/400 (garage queen, hand-me-down from dad) -72 Tribute Trans Am (6.0LS/T56 6-speed) in progress -2003 YUKON (Wife's) -71 gmc swb fleet (current project, gonna shave everything, bags, stuff w/ 20's, gen III powertrain) -48 3100 SWB - 12/31/23 LONG TERM Project |
03-16-2008, 08:52 PM | #8 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Fair Oaks, CA
Posts: 475
|
Re: Suzuki Sidekck tank in 69 GMC?
If you run a regulator w/ fuel injected pump you'll have plenty of supply since there's 50psi on the other side of the regulator I'm sure whatever the volume is w/ 1/4" line and 50psi will suppply the 6psi and needed volume w/ 3/8 line just fine. Alsoi look into the ohm range of the sender on a sidekick tank and you might be able to use it or buy and auto meter gauge that uses that ohm range.
__________________
1968 Short Fleet 350/700r4 http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=249435 1997 Bagged XtdCab Vortec350/4L60e http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...44#post2286144 1993 XtdCab Longbed 4x4 6.5Turbo/NV4500 "Daily Driver" 1985 Toyota XtdCab 4x4 22re/W-56/Dual T-cases, Doug Thorley Header, Homebrew front and rear spring packs, Tons of Mods to suspension and drivetrain, 35" boggers, coming soon ARB's and 5.29's, Possible 4.3/700r4 swap Last edited by Scott68-93-97; 03-16-2008 at 08:53 PM. |
03-17-2008, 03:44 AM | #9 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Monroe,Georgia
Posts: 313
|
Re: Suzuki Sidekck tank in 69 GMC?
Thanks folks for the input. What about other alternatives to the Blazer tank. I will look into the Cherokee as mentioned. I may try to stay with a carbureted vehicle because of the pressure and fuel line size issues.
|
Bookmarks |
|
|