The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1960 - 1966 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-04-2008, 04:36 AM   #1
DWC
Registered User
 
DWC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 138
Motor Mounts truck-vs car

All of these posts about engine swaps and motor mounts made me go take a look at my setup. What I discovered was that it appears the PO modified the passenger side mount so the engine is shifted slightly to the driver side.

I'm not sure why he would do this? The only thing I could think of is that the 283 in my truck came from a passenegr car, so I was told. Is the engine side part of the mount different from a car -vs- a truck on an early 283? If it is shorter he may have bolted up the driver side then modified the passenger side to make it work.

Any thoughts?
DWC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2008, 05:05 AM   #2
protrash64
Resistance is Futile
 
protrash64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mesa,Arizona
Posts: 3,520
Re: Motor Mounts truck-vs car

Mine are the same way in the 'burb and I have not investigated it. Does you truck have a crossmember swap? I think mine does but looks so close I cant tell. My a-arms have the 73+ bushings.......
__________________
64 CHEVY PICK-UP > http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...otrash+re-hash
64 CARRYALL >http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...=1964+suburban
66 LB >http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=427852
STRENGTH/DETERMINATION/MERCILESS/FOREVER
.......posted via stationary device
protrash64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2008, 06:08 AM   #3
padresag
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Sidney,b.c.
Posts: 4,425
Re: Motor Mounts truck-vs car

it may have had a 292 I6 in it . a 292 uses a shorter and offset mount on that side.230-250 and 283 are all the same. just put in a frame tower from 1 of those 3 engs and it will be right
ron
padresag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2008, 08:08 AM   #4
protrash64
Resistance is Futile
 
protrash64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mesa,Arizona
Posts: 3,520
Re: Motor Mounts truck-vs car

Thanx padresag......mine definitely had the 292. Kick tag has the specs for it and PO said he did the swap. Hadnt seen the 6-cyl mounts before.
__________________
64 CHEVY PICK-UP > http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...otrash+re-hash
64 CARRYALL >http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...=1964+suburban
66 LB >http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=427852
STRENGTH/DETERMINATION/MERCILESS/FOREVER
.......posted via stationary device
protrash64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2008, 06:59 PM   #5
DWC
Registered User
 
DWC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Central Ohio
Posts: 138
Re: Motor Mounts truck-vs car

I don't think the 6cyl mount is my problem. My truck has always had a 283 from what I was told.

I did a search awhile back and thought I read that there were 2 styles of early engine mounts. One was taller and narrower -vs- a shorter and wider style. Supposedly the 283 in my truck came from a car so maybe if this is a shorter mount a switch to the taller mount may fix my problem. I'm going to measure the mount as best I can today. I'll try and find that post again, it had the dimensions if I remember right. I'll post the info here if I find it.

Thanks
DWC is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com