![]() |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Valley Center KS
Posts: 3,525
|
Air bag shocks
I did a little searching but couldn't find the answer, so what shocks are you guys running with your airbag setups?
I'm using RE7s front and rear. The front cups have been cut about an inch and I have 2.5" drop spindles. The rear bags are mounted directly to the control arm and frame and there is a mild 2.5" c-notch in the frame (go find my build thread if you need a picture). So what are some shock recomendations? Do I need to relocate any shock mounts? I'm planning on driving it with the bags about mid height (though I haven't had the body on it or wheels to really know for sure) Thanks Derek |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 3,728
|
Re: Air bag shocks
Shocks are a preference deal more often than not. I ran stock length front and 2" drop rear shocks from CPP. I had ordered drop shocks for the front, but it limited the lift too much, so I sent them back.
They were ok, but I think the KYB's are better.
__________________
New Project: 1966 LWB C20 Plans: 1/2 ton conversion Dropmember front Dropmember rear Corvette discs Restored raised bed http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s....php?p=4295210 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,981
|
Re: Air bag shocks
Derek, a 'touring' type ride qualifies for better than average dampeners. With some slight fabrication, I have Bilsteins on my 68.
When I set-up the suspension I had 2.5" drop spindles, ART arms, RE-7's, & a notched cross member. I fabricated new upper shock mounts so the shocks would be @ mid travel @ ride height (the lower mounts are in the standard location). For the rear of my 68, I have RE-6's, 2" blocks, relocated shock brackets, & a tweaked 'super' track bar. Since Bilstein doesn't make a rear shock for 67-72 coil spring applications, the choices are either use the same p/n on the rear or, use a different shock. I reasoned the front shock used in back might be too stiff so I used a rear shock for a lowered 88-98 GM. The 88-98's rear shock valving should be extremely close for other GM trucks of similar weight distribution. I had to raise the upper shock mounts (which were already raised via a home-made relocation kit) in order to get the optimum travel @ ride height. I could have dropped my lower shock mount a little more & used the upper shock crossmember in the stock location but I opted to raise the entire upper shock crossmember 3". This worked for me since I also raised my bedfloor. With the suspension under normal conditions (weight of the truck sitting in the driveway), the shocks feel great. Not too stiff, not too loose.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|